Differences in Intersegmental Foot and Ankle Motion Between Patients With Varus and Valgus Ankle Osteoarthritis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Min Gyu Kyung, Jahyung Kim, Joonhee Kim, Kyoung Min Lee, Dong Yeon Lee
{"title":"Differences in Intersegmental Foot and Ankle Motion Between Patients With Varus and Valgus Ankle Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Min Gyu Kyung, Jahyung Kim, Joonhee Kim, Kyoung Min Lee, Dong Yeon Lee","doi":"10.1002/jor.26106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In instances of ankle osteoarthritis (OA), a significant proportion of patients exhibit varus ankle OA, while valgus ankle OA is less commonly seen. Both types employ distinct compensatory mechanisms to sustain a plantigrade gait. This study explored the variations in intersegmental foot and ankle motions between patients with varus and valgus ankle OA using multisegment foot gait analysis. The study included 55 patients with varus and 13 with valgus end-stage ankle OA. The DuPont foot model was utilized to evaluate intersegmental foot and ankle kinematics, and temporospatial gait parameters were also analyzed. Both groups displayed comparable temporospatial parameters. Notably, the varus ankle OA group showed significantly reduced sagittal range of motion (ROM) in both the forefoot and hindfoot but increased coronal ROM in the forefoot compared to their counterparts. The valgus ankle OA group demonstrated a significantly greater hindfoot coronal ROM compared to the varus ankle OA group. The varus ankle OA group exhibited significant hallux dorsiflexion during the terminal stance phase. In addition, the varus ankle OA group demonstrated significant forefoot plantar flexion and adduction during the stance phase and forefoot eversion throughout the gait cycle. In contrast, the valgus ankle OA group showed significant hindfoot eversion throughout the gait cycle and hindfoot dorsiflexion during the terminal stance phase. Although both groups displayed similar absolute talar tilt angles, distinct differences in the ROM and intersegmental positions highlighted unique compensatory mechanisms, emphasizing the value of kinematic analysis in assessing functional adaptations related to coronal alignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In instances of ankle osteoarthritis (OA), a significant proportion of patients exhibit varus ankle OA, while valgus ankle OA is less commonly seen. Both types employ distinct compensatory mechanisms to sustain a plantigrade gait. This study explored the variations in intersegmental foot and ankle motions between patients with varus and valgus ankle OA using multisegment foot gait analysis. The study included 55 patients with varus and 13 with valgus end-stage ankle OA. The DuPont foot model was utilized to evaluate intersegmental foot and ankle kinematics, and temporospatial gait parameters were also analyzed. Both groups displayed comparable temporospatial parameters. Notably, the varus ankle OA group showed significantly reduced sagittal range of motion (ROM) in both the forefoot and hindfoot but increased coronal ROM in the forefoot compared to their counterparts. The valgus ankle OA group demonstrated a significantly greater hindfoot coronal ROM compared to the varus ankle OA group. The varus ankle OA group exhibited significant hallux dorsiflexion during the terminal stance phase. In addition, the varus ankle OA group demonstrated significant forefoot plantar flexion and adduction during the stance phase and forefoot eversion throughout the gait cycle. In contrast, the valgus ankle OA group showed significant hindfoot eversion throughout the gait cycle and hindfoot dorsiflexion during the terminal stance phase. Although both groups displayed similar absolute talar tilt angles, distinct differences in the ROM and intersegmental positions highlighted unique compensatory mechanisms, emphasizing the value of kinematic analysis in assessing functional adaptations related to coronal alignment.

内翻和外翻踝关节骨性关节炎患者节段间足和踝关节运动的差异。
在踝关节骨关节炎(OA)的情况下,相当一部分患者表现为踝关节内翻,而踝关节外翻不太常见。这两种类型都采用不同的代偿机制来维持植行步态。本研究利用多节段足部步态分析探讨了内翻和外翻踝关节骨性关节炎患者节段间足部和踝关节运动的变化。该研究包括55例内翻患者和13例外翻终末期踝关节骨关节炎患者。采用杜邦足模型对足、踝节间运动学进行评估,并对步态的时空参数进行分析。两组的时空参数具有可比性。值得注意的是,与对照组相比,踝关节内翻组的前后足矢状关节活动度(ROM)均显著降低,但前足冠状关节活动度(ROM)增加。与踝关节内翻OA组相比,外翻OA组后足冠状ROM明显增加。踝关节内翻OA组在站立末期表现出明显的拇背屈。此外,踝关节内翻OA组在站立阶段表现出明显的前足足底屈曲和内收,在整个步态周期中表现出前足外翻。相比之下,外翻踝关节OA组在整个步态周期中表现出明显的后脚外翻,在站立末期表现出明显的后脚背屈。尽管两组均表现出相似的绝对距骨倾斜角度,但ROM和节段间位置的明显差异突出了独特的代偿机制,强调了运动学分析在评估与冠状排列相关的功能适应方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信