Pre-Service Teachers Lack Knowledge of ADHD, But Report Optimism for Supporting Students With ADHD.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Attention Disorders Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-31 DOI:10.1177/10870547251340740
Anna Catherine Henley, Summer S Braun
{"title":"Pre-Service Teachers Lack Knowledge of ADHD, But Report Optimism for Supporting Students With ADHD.","authors":"Anna Catherine Henley, Summer S Braun","doi":"10.1177/10870547251340740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reports estimate at least one child in every general education classroom in the U.S. has ADHD. Thus, teachers should enter the classroom with an accurate working knowledge of ADHD and the skills to respond effectively to support the development of these students. The present study tested the following research questions (RQs): (RQ1) How knowledgeable are preservice teachers about ADHD? (RQ2) What are pre-service teachers' naturalistic responses to students with ADHD? Are pre-service teachers' (RQ3) knowledge of ADHD, (RQ4) stress, and (RQ5) mindfulness skills associated with three types of responses to working with students with ADHD: evaluation of social/behavioral problems, emotional distress, and investment in treatment and classroom practices? (RQ6) Does mindfulness moderate the association between stress and teachers' responses to students with ADHD?</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 101 education majors in a teacher education program at a large Southeastern university in the United States. Multivariate regressions were employed to assess RQs 3-6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-service teachers correctly answered 52% of items (<i>SD</i> = 0.15) measuring knowledge of ADHD. There were no significant associations between knowledge of ADHD, stress, and mindfulness skills and pre-service teachers' responses to students with ADHD, nor did mindfulness moderate the association between stress and outcomes. However, pre-service teachers with previous experience teaching students with ADHD perceived students' behavioral challenges as more serious than those without experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicated that pre-service teachers lacked comprehensive knowledge of ADHD but responded to students with ADHD in a supportive manner. Notably, these findings indicate that teachers entering the workforce within the next two years are willing to implement supportive practices for students with ADHD. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"848-863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251340740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Reports estimate at least one child in every general education classroom in the U.S. has ADHD. Thus, teachers should enter the classroom with an accurate working knowledge of ADHD and the skills to respond effectively to support the development of these students. The present study tested the following research questions (RQs): (RQ1) How knowledgeable are preservice teachers about ADHD? (RQ2) What are pre-service teachers' naturalistic responses to students with ADHD? Are pre-service teachers' (RQ3) knowledge of ADHD, (RQ4) stress, and (RQ5) mindfulness skills associated with three types of responses to working with students with ADHD: evaluation of social/behavioral problems, emotional distress, and investment in treatment and classroom practices? (RQ6) Does mindfulness moderate the association between stress and teachers' responses to students with ADHD?

Method: Participants were 101 education majors in a teacher education program at a large Southeastern university in the United States. Multivariate regressions were employed to assess RQs 3-6.

Results: Pre-service teachers correctly answered 52% of items (SD = 0.15) measuring knowledge of ADHD. There were no significant associations between knowledge of ADHD, stress, and mindfulness skills and pre-service teachers' responses to students with ADHD, nor did mindfulness moderate the association between stress and outcomes. However, pre-service teachers with previous experience teaching students with ADHD perceived students' behavioral challenges as more serious than those without experience.

Conclusion: Results indicated that pre-service teachers lacked comprehensive knowledge of ADHD but responded to students with ADHD in a supportive manner. Notably, these findings indicate that teachers entering the workforce within the next two years are willing to implement supportive practices for students with ADHD. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

职前教师缺乏ADHD知识,但对支持ADHD学生持乐观态度。
目的:报告估计在美国每个普通教育教室中至少有一个孩子患有多动症。因此,教师应该带着对ADHD的准确认识和有效回应的技能进入课堂,以支持这些学生的发展。本研究测试了以下研究问题:(rq)职前教师对ADHD的了解程度如何?(RQ2)职前教师对ADHD学生的自然反应是什么?职前教师(RQ3)对ADHD的了解、(RQ4)压力和(RQ5)正念技能是否与与ADHD学生一起工作的三种反应有关:对社交/行为问题的评估、情绪困扰、对治疗和课堂实践的投入?(RQ6)正念是否能调节压力与教师对ADHD学生的反应之间的关系?方法:研究对象为美国东南部一所大型大学教师教育项目的101名教育专业学生。采用多因素回归评估RQs 3 ~ 6。结果:职前教师对ADHD知识的正确率为52% (SD = 0.15)。注意缺陷多动障碍知识、压力和正念技能与职前教师对注意缺陷多动障碍学生的反应之间没有显著关联,正念也没有调节压力和结果之间的关联。然而,有过ADHD教学经验的职前教师认为学生的行为挑战比没有经验的教师更严重。结论:职前教师对ADHD缺乏全面的认识,但对ADHD学生持支持态度。值得注意的是,这些发现表明,在未来两年内进入职场的教师愿意为患有多动症的学生实施支持性实践。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信