Significance of Inflammation Markers to Predict Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Yenigürbüz Serkan, Ediz Caner, Akan Serkan, Kati Bulent, Vural Yasin, Alcin Adem, Yilmaz Omer
{"title":"Significance of Inflammation Markers to Predict Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.","authors":"Yenigürbüz Serkan, Ediz Caner, Akan Serkan, Kati Bulent, Vural Yasin, Alcin Adem, Yilmaz Omer","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Active surveillance (AS) strategy aims to avoid unnecessary or excessive early treatment in patients at a low risk for prostate cancer (PCa). However, a biomarker that can predict the need for early curative treatment in patients under AS has not been identified to date. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the requirement of curative treatment in the early period in patients under AS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included a total of 83 patients with the diagnosis of PCa and under AS. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and follow-up period were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII (p = 0.037, p = 0.046, p = 0.008, p = 0.004 and p = 0.005, respectively). The cut-off value determined by performing ROC analysis to evaluate the levels that predict the need for curative treatment before AS was 0.125 for PSAD (sensitivity: 61.8%, specificity: 61.2%), 2.01 for NLR (sensitivity: 67.6%, specificity: 55.1%), 115.49 for PLR (sensitivity: 73.5%, specificity: 59.2%) and 465.40 for SII (sensitivity: 70.6%, specificity: 59.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII before making the decision to conduct AS can guide clinicians regarding curative treatment in the early period.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"e70059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Active surveillance (AS) strategy aims to avoid unnecessary or excessive early treatment in patients at a low risk for prostate cancer (PCa). However, a biomarker that can predict the need for early curative treatment in patients under AS has not been identified to date. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the requirement of curative treatment in the early period in patients under AS.

Materials and methods: This study included a total of 83 patients with the diagnosis of PCa and under AS. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and follow-up period were compared between the groups.

Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII (p = 0.037, p = 0.046, p = 0.008, p = 0.004 and p = 0.005, respectively). The cut-off value determined by performing ROC analysis to evaluate the levels that predict the need for curative treatment before AS was 0.125 for PSAD (sensitivity: 61.8%, specificity: 61.2%), 2.01 for NLR (sensitivity: 67.6%, specificity: 55.1%), 115.49 for PLR (sensitivity: 73.5%, specificity: 59.2%) and 465.40 for SII (sensitivity: 70.6%, specificity: 59.2%).

Conclusions: The analysis of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII before making the decision to conduct AS can guide clinicians regarding curative treatment in the early period.

炎症标志物对主动监测前列腺癌患者疗效预测的意义。
目的:主动监测(AS)策略旨在避免低风险前列腺癌(PCa)患者不必要或过度的早期治疗。然而,迄今为止还没有发现一种生物标志物可以预测AS患者是否需要早期治疗。在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨炎症生物标志物在预测AS患者早期治愈性治疗需求方面的潜力。材料与方法:本研究共纳入83例诊断为PCa且AS下的患者。比较两组患者年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、前列腺体积(PV)、PSA密度(PSAD)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)及随访时间。结果:两组患者PSAD、NLR、PLR、SII评分差异均有统计学意义(p = 0.037、p = 0.046、p = 0.008、p = 0.004、p = 0.005)。通过进行ROC分析来评估预测AS前需要根治性治疗的水平的临界值,PSAD为0.125(敏感性:61.8%,特异性:61.2%),NLR为2.01(敏感性:67.6%,特异性:55.1%),PLR为115.49(敏感性:73.5%,特异性:59.2%),SII为465.40(敏感性:70.6%,特异性:59.2%)。结论:在决定是否进行AS前分析PSAD、NLR、PLR和SII,可以指导临床医生在早期进行根治性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信