Pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy versus transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation with unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Amir Sadeghi, Erfan Arabpour, Reyhaneh Rastegar, Ehsan Hosseinzadeh, Parya Mozafari Komesh Tape, Mohammad Reza Zali
{"title":"Pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy versus transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation with unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Amir Sadeghi, Erfan Arabpour, Reyhaneh Rastegar, Ehsan Hosseinzadeh, Parya Mozafari Komesh Tape, Mohammad Reza Zali","doi":"10.1007/s12664-025-01774-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Difficult biliary cannulation with unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation is a challenging issue, even for experienced endoscopists. This prospective, randomized, single-center trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two advanced rescue cannulation methods in this context: transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy and pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with intact papilla who were planned to undergo bile duct cannulation were screened and those who experienced difficult cannulation with at least two inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulations following unsuccessful double guidewire technique attempts were randomly assigned one of two rescue cannulation techniques: pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy and transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy. The primary outcome was the cannulation success rate and the secondary outcome was the frequency of cannulation-related adverse events (trial registration number: IRCT20230314057717N1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 730 patients were screened and 194 were recruited according to the study protocol (97 in each group). Successful biliary cannulation was achieved in 93.8% (n = 91) of the pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy group and 81.4% (n = 79) of the transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy group (p-value = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy technique and a normal common bile duct diameter were independently associated with unsuccessful cannulation. No significant differences were observed regarding pancreatitis and other adverse events between the two groups (p = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In difficult biliary cannulation accompanied by inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation, following unsuccessful double guidewire technique, pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy is superior to transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation, with similar rates of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-025-01774-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Difficult biliary cannulation with unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation is a challenging issue, even for experienced endoscopists. This prospective, randomized, single-center trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two advanced rescue cannulation methods in this context: transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy and pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy.

Methods: Patients with intact papilla who were planned to undergo bile duct cannulation were screened and those who experienced difficult cannulation with at least two inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulations following unsuccessful double guidewire technique attempts were randomly assigned one of two rescue cannulation techniques: pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy and transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy. The primary outcome was the cannulation success rate and the secondary outcome was the frequency of cannulation-related adverse events (trial registration number: IRCT20230314057717N1).

Results: Total 730 patients were screened and 194 were recruited according to the study protocol (97 in each group). Successful biliary cannulation was achieved in 93.8% (n = 91) of the pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy group and 81.4% (n = 79) of the transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy group (p-value = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy technique and a normal common bile duct diameter were independently associated with unsuccessful cannulation. No significant differences were observed regarding pancreatitis and other adverse events between the two groups (p = 0.31).

Conclusions: In difficult biliary cannulation accompanied by inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation, following unsuccessful double guidewire technique, pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy is superior to transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation, with similar rates of adverse events.

胰导丝辅助瘘管切开术与经胰胆道括约肌切开术在困难胆道插管与无意胰管插管中的比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景和目的:困难的胆道插管与无意胰管插管是一个具有挑战性的问题,即使是经验丰富的内窥镜医师。这项前瞻性、随机、单中心试验旨在评估两种先进的抢救插管方法在这种情况下的安全性和有效性:经胰腺胆道括约肌切开术和胰导丝辅助瘘管切开术。方法:筛选计划行胆管插管的乳头完整患者,对双导丝技术失败后至少两次不慎行胰管插管困难的患者,随机分配胰导丝辅助瘘管切开术和经胰胆括约肌切开术两种抢救插管技术中的一种。主要终点是插管成功率,次要终点是插管相关不良事件发生的频率(试验注册号:IRCT20230314057717N1)。结果:共筛查730例患者,根据研究方案招募194例患者(每组97例)。胰导丝辅助造瘘组插管成功率为93.8% (n = 91),经胰胆括约肌切开术组插管成功率为81.4% (n = 79) (p值= 0.01)。多因素分析显示经胰胆括约肌切开术和胆总管直径正常与插管失败独立相关。两组在胰腺炎和其他不良事件方面无显著差异(p = 0.31)。结论:在胆道插管困难并不慎胰管插管的情况下,双导丝技术不成功后,胰导丝辅助造瘘术优于经胰胆括约肌切开术,不良事件发生率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信