Analysis of Increased False-Positive ELISA Results for HIV in the Blood of Donors Infected with SARS-CoV-2.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
H Lin, Z Wang, Q Ren, Z Cai, F Ge, W Yuan, T Liao, Y Wu, R Peng, Y Gu, Y Kuang
{"title":"Analysis of Increased False-Positive ELISA Results for HIV in the Blood of Donors Infected with SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"H Lin, Z Wang, Q Ren, Z Cai, F Ge, W Yuan, T Liao, Y Wu, R Peng, Y Gu, Y Kuang","doi":"10.1007/s10517-025-06411-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study examined the effect of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus in the blood of donors after COVID-19 on objectivity of HIV detection in the blood samples with two ELISA variants employing reagents A or B in order to select reliable kits to minimize the false-positive HIV results. Retrospectively, the quality control data of two ELISA kits with reagents A or B developed to detect HIV were analyzed using the control sera together with the results of donor blood tested with both kits, which were collected in the periods from January to December 2022 (n = 55,528) and from January to March 2023 (n = 13,837). From the blood samples obtained in 2023, all the specimens with false-positive HIV results obtained with reagent A were selected (n = 126) together with randomly taken samples of this pool with negative HIV results (n = 345). All selected samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus, thereupon the correlation analysis was performed between the samples containing SARS-CoV-2 and those with HIV detected by ELISA reagent A. The data on reactivity of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 significantly correlated with the false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A (r = 0.451, p < 0.01). In 2023, the share of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A was 0.91% (126/13,837), which was 6.06-fold greater than the corresponding value in 2022 (0.133% (74/55,528); χ<sup>2</sup> = 230.38, p < 0.01). This data echoed the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic resulting in the appearance of antibodies against the virus in the donor blood. At the same time, the number of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent B in 2022 (0.014% (8/55,521)) and in 2023 (0.036% (5/13,837)) were essentially smaller than those obtained with reagent A, and the results obtained with the test kit B did not significantly differ from each other for both time periods. Thus, IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood of donors after COVID-19 can affect the results of HIV detection by some ELISA reagents and consequently elevate the number of false-positive analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9331,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"755-759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-025-06411-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined the effect of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus in the blood of donors after COVID-19 on objectivity of HIV detection in the blood samples with two ELISA variants employing reagents A or B in order to select reliable kits to minimize the false-positive HIV results. Retrospectively, the quality control data of two ELISA kits with reagents A or B developed to detect HIV were analyzed using the control sera together with the results of donor blood tested with both kits, which were collected in the periods from January to December 2022 (n = 55,528) and from January to March 2023 (n = 13,837). From the blood samples obtained in 2023, all the specimens with false-positive HIV results obtained with reagent A were selected (n = 126) together with randomly taken samples of this pool with negative HIV results (n = 345). All selected samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus, thereupon the correlation analysis was performed between the samples containing SARS-CoV-2 and those with HIV detected by ELISA reagent A. The data on reactivity of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 significantly correlated with the false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A (r = 0.451, p < 0.01). In 2023, the share of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A was 0.91% (126/13,837), which was 6.06-fold greater than the corresponding value in 2022 (0.133% (74/55,528); χ2 = 230.38, p < 0.01). This data echoed the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic resulting in the appearance of antibodies against the virus in the donor blood. At the same time, the number of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent B in 2022 (0.014% (8/55,521)) and in 2023 (0.036% (5/13,837)) were essentially smaller than those obtained with reagent A, and the results obtained with the test kit B did not significantly differ from each other for both time periods. Thus, IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood of donors after COVID-19 can affect the results of HIV detection by some ELISA reagents and consequently elevate the number of false-positive analyses.

SARS-CoV-2感染献血者血液中HIV假阳性增加的ELISA结果分析
本研究检测了COVID-19后献血者血液中针对SARS-CoV-2病毒的IgG抗体对使用试剂A或B的两种ELISA变体血液样本中HIV检测客观性的影响,以便选择可靠的试剂盒以尽量减少HIV假阳性结果。回顾性分析2022年1月至12月(n = 55,528)和2023年1月至3月(n = 13,837)采集的对照血清和两种试剂盒的供血结果,对两种试剂盒检测HIV的ELISA试剂盒的质量控制数据进行分析。从2023年获得的血样中,选择所有用A试剂获得的HIV假阳性样本(n = 126)和随机抽取的HIV阴性样本(n = 345)。所有样本均检测SARS-CoV-2病毒IgG抗体,并与ELISA试剂A检测的HIV阳性样本进行相关性分析。SARS-CoV-2抗体IgG反应性与ELISA试剂A检测的HIV假阳性结果显著相关(r = 0.451, p < 0.01)。2023年A试剂检测HIV的ELISA假阳性比例为0.91%(126/ 13837),比2022年的0.133%(74/55,528)增加了6.06倍;χ2 = 230.38, p < 0.01)。这一数据与导致献血者血液中出现针对该病毒的抗体的SARS-CoV-2流行相呼应。同时,2022年和2023年使用试剂B获得的HIV ELISA假阳性数(0.014%(8/55,521)和0.036%(5/13,837))基本上少于使用试剂A获得的假阳性数,并且在两个时间段内使用试剂盒B获得的结果没有显著差异。因此,COVID-19后献血者血液中针对SARS-CoV-2的IgG抗体会影响一些ELISA试剂检测HIV的结果,从而增加假阳性分析的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
265
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine presents original peer reviewed research papers and brief reports on priority new research results in physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, pharmacology, immunology, microbiology, genetics, oncology, etc. Novel trends in science are covered in new sections of the journal - Biogerontology and Human Ecology - that first appeared in 2005. World scientific interest in stem cells prompted inclusion into Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine a quarterly scientific journal Cell Technologies in Biology and Medicine (a new Russian Academy of Medical Sciences publication since 2005). It publishes only original papers from the leading research institutions on molecular biology of stem and progenitor cells, stem cell as the basis of gene therapy, molecular language of cell-to-cell communication, cytokines, chemokines, growth and other factors, pilot projects on clinical use of stem and progenitor cells. The Russian Volume Year is published in English from April.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信