Assessing use of eau recommendations in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a case vignette study on dutch pelvic floor physiotherapists practices.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Myrthe Wissing, Marian Rombouts, Monique Steegers, Kris Vissers, Selina van der Wal, Kim Notten
{"title":"Assessing use of eau recommendations in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a case vignette study on dutch pelvic floor physiotherapists practices.","authors":"Myrthe Wissing, Marian Rombouts, Monique Steegers, Kris Vissers, Selina van der Wal, Kim Notten","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03782-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS) presents as pain located in the pelvic area lasting for at least six months, often with a multifactorial aetiology. The International Continence Society divides CPPS in multiple domains; one is the musculoskeletal domain. Pelvic floor physiotherapy is a recommended treatment and is advised in the European Association of Urologist (EAU) guidelines. However, in the Netherlands, it is unclear which treatment strategies are used by pelvic floor physiotherapists (PFPs) for CPPS patients due to the lack of a Dutch evidenced-based guideline for physiotherapists. This study provides an overview of the adherence to the EAU guideline by PFPs in managing CPPS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case vignette study using two case vignettes and a general questionnaire defining contextual data. Participants were PFPs treating patients with CPPS in primary care. We contacted 550 qualified PFPs registered in the Dutch national quality registry for physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>first, adherence to EAU guidelines and second, the adherence compared to level of education and caseload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the invited participants, 198 completed the survey. Of these, 29 (14.6%) scored higher than 80% for both case vignettes; fifty-four (27%) scored 80% for the male case vignette and 30 (15%) scored 80% for the female case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show low adherence to the EAU guideline's proposed diagnostic and treatment criteria. PFPs should become more familiar with implementation of this guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03782-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS) presents as pain located in the pelvic area lasting for at least six months, often with a multifactorial aetiology. The International Continence Society divides CPPS in multiple domains; one is the musculoskeletal domain. Pelvic floor physiotherapy is a recommended treatment and is advised in the European Association of Urologist (EAU) guidelines. However, in the Netherlands, it is unclear which treatment strategies are used by pelvic floor physiotherapists (PFPs) for CPPS patients due to the lack of a Dutch evidenced-based guideline for physiotherapists. This study provides an overview of the adherence to the EAU guideline by PFPs in managing CPPS patients.

Methods: A case vignette study using two case vignettes and a general questionnaire defining contextual data. Participants were PFPs treating patients with CPPS in primary care. We contacted 550 qualified PFPs registered in the Dutch national quality registry for physiotherapy.

Main outcome measure: first, adherence to EAU guidelines and second, the adherence compared to level of education and caseload.

Results: Of the invited participants, 198 completed the survey. Of these, 29 (14.6%) scored higher than 80% for both case vignettes; fifty-four (27%) scored 80% for the male case vignette and 30 (15%) scored 80% for the female case.

Conclusions: Our findings show low adherence to the EAU guideline's proposed diagnostic and treatment criteria. PFPs should become more familiar with implementation of this guideline.

评估在慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的诊断和治疗策略中eau推荐的使用:荷兰盆底物理治疗师实践的案例研究。
背景:慢性骨盆疼痛综合征(CPPS)表现为位于骨盆区域的疼痛持续至少6个月,通常具有多因素病因。国际自制学会将CPPS划分为多个领域;一个是肌肉骨骼领域。盆底物理治疗是一种推荐的治疗方法,并在欧洲泌尿科医师协会(EAU)指南中提出建议。然而,在荷兰,由于缺乏针对物理治疗师的荷兰循证指南,目前尚不清楚盆底物理治疗师(PFPs)对CPPS患者使用哪种治疗策略。本研究概述了PFPs在管理CPPS患者时遵守EAU指南的情况。方法:一个案例小故事研究,使用两个案例小故事和一个定义上下文数据的一般问卷。参与者是在初级保健中治疗CPPS患者的PFPs。我们联系了在荷兰国家物理治疗质量登记处注册的550名合格的pfp。主要结果衡量指标:第一,对EAU指南的遵守情况;第二,与教育水平和病例量相比的遵守情况。结果:在被邀请的参与者中,有198人完成了调查。其中,29个(14.6%)在两种情况下的得分都高于80%;54人(27%)对男性病例的小插曲得分为80%,30人(15%)对女性病例的小插曲得分为80%。结论:我们的研究结果显示对EAU指南提出的诊断和治疗标准的依从性较低。pfp应该更加熟悉该指南的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信