Murillo Frazão, Fábio de Lima Martins, Gerson Cipriano
{"title":"Recumbent FES-Cycling Exercise Improves Muscle Performance and Ambulation Capacity in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Murillo Frazão, Fábio de Lima Martins, Gerson Cipriano","doi":"10.1111/aor.15029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acquired muscle weakness is a prevalent complication during hospitalization. Supportive technologies, such as functional electrical stimulation cycling (FES-cycling), are increasingly recognized as a tool with the potential to improve physical exercise in patients constrained to bed rest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, patients admitted to a high-complexity ward exhibiting clinical signs of muscle weakness (e.g., report of loss of strength, gait, or balance deficit due to weakness or restriction to bed) were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to a recumbent high-intensity, low-volume FES-cycling exercise or a control group. The primary outcomes measured were torque, power output, stimulation cost (neuromuscular efficiency), and ambulation capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 16 patients (eight in each group). Postintervention, the FES-cycling group presented a greater increase in both absolute (4.25 ± 3.15 vs. 0.04 ± 3.49 Nm, p = 0.02) and percentage torque (117 ± 88 vs. 8% ± 53%, p < 0.01) compared to the control. Similarly, the FES-cycling group presented higher absolute (3.91 ± 2.25 vs. 0.57 ± 1.82 watts, p < 0.01) and percentage power (61 ± 36 vs. 10% ± 23%, p < 0.01), along with a higher absolute (-2903 ± 2598 vs. -523 ± 1319 μC/watt, p = 0.03) and percentage stimulation cost (-33 ± 18 vs. -6% ± 1 8%, p = 0.01). Additionally, enhanced ambulation capacity was observed in the FES-cycling group, with 6 patients showing improvement versus 2 in the control group (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recumbent high-intensity, low-volume FES-cycling exercise increased muscle strength, power, and neuromuscular efficiency in hospitalized patients with muscle weakness. Improvements in ambulation capacity were also noted, supporting the intervention potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.15029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acquired muscle weakness is a prevalent complication during hospitalization. Supportive technologies, such as functional electrical stimulation cycling (FES-cycling), are increasingly recognized as a tool with the potential to improve physical exercise in patients constrained to bed rest.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, patients admitted to a high-complexity ward exhibiting clinical signs of muscle weakness (e.g., report of loss of strength, gait, or balance deficit due to weakness or restriction to bed) were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to a recumbent high-intensity, low-volume FES-cycling exercise or a control group. The primary outcomes measured were torque, power output, stimulation cost (neuromuscular efficiency), and ambulation capacity.
Results: The analysis included 16 patients (eight in each group). Postintervention, the FES-cycling group presented a greater increase in both absolute (4.25 ± 3.15 vs. 0.04 ± 3.49 Nm, p = 0.02) and percentage torque (117 ± 88 vs. 8% ± 53%, p < 0.01) compared to the control. Similarly, the FES-cycling group presented higher absolute (3.91 ± 2.25 vs. 0.57 ± 1.82 watts, p < 0.01) and percentage power (61 ± 36 vs. 10% ± 23%, p < 0.01), along with a higher absolute (-2903 ± 2598 vs. -523 ± 1319 μC/watt, p = 0.03) and percentage stimulation cost (-33 ± 18 vs. -6% ± 1 8%, p = 0.01). Additionally, enhanced ambulation capacity was observed in the FES-cycling group, with 6 patients showing improvement versus 2 in the control group (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Recumbent high-intensity, low-volume FES-cycling exercise increased muscle strength, power, and neuromuscular efficiency in hospitalized patients with muscle weakness. Improvements in ambulation capacity were also noted, supporting the intervention potential.
背景:获得性肌无力是住院期间常见的并发症。支持性技术,如功能性电刺激循环(FES-cycling),越来越被认为是一种有潜力改善卧床休息患者体育锻炼的工具。方法:在这项随机临床试验中,入组了高复杂性病房的患者,这些患者表现出肌肉无力的临床症状(例如,由于无力或卧床而报告失去力量、步态或平衡缺陷)。参与者被随机分配到横卧高强度、低量fes骑行组或对照组。测量的主要结果是扭矩、功率输出、刺激成本(神经肌肉效率)和行走能力。结果:共纳入16例患者,每组8例。干预后,FES-cycling组的绝对扭矩(4.25±3.15 Nm vs. 0.04±3.49 Nm, p = 0.02)和扭矩百分比(117±88 Nm vs. 8%±53%,p)均有较大的增加。结论:平卧高强度、低容量FES-cycling运动可提高住院肌无力患者的肌力、动力和神经肌肉效率。还注意到行走能力的改善,支持了干预的潜力。
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.