Effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: insights from 468 cases.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giosuè Giordano Incognito, Katja Jakopič Maček, Mija Blaganje, Kristina Drusany Starič, Giuseppe Ettore, Carla Ettore, Maša Lukež Podgornik, Ivan Verdenik, Nataša Kenda Šuster
{"title":"Effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: insights from 468 cases.","authors":"Giosuè Giordano Incognito, Katja Jakopič Maček, Mija Blaganje, Kristina Drusany Starič, Giuseppe Ettore, Carla Ettore, Maša Lukež Podgornik, Ivan Verdenik, Nataša Kenda Šuster","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08075-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retained products of conception (RPOC) are a common complication following pregnancy. Office hysteroscopy (OH) is increasingly used for diagnostics and management due to its minimally invasive nature. However, incidence of incomplete OH removal and procedures in which no RPOC are identified despite prior suspicion remains a concern. This study aimed to identify factors associated with these outcomes to improve patient selection and procedural success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on patients referred for OH for presumed RPOC between August 2015 and April 2023 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. Inclusion criteria included hemodynamically stable patients with prolonged bleeding and/or suspicious ultrasound (US) findings post-pregnancy. Patients with RPOC thickness of more than 30 mm or strong tissue vascularization on US were excluded. Data on patient demographics, US features, and procedural outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 468 patients, RPOC removal was performed in 333 cases (71.2%), of which 225 (67.6%) were successfully completed, while in 135 cases (28.8%), the procedure was only diagnostic due to the absence of RPOC. Regarding procedural success, neither the pregnancy outcome, i.e., termination of pregnancy (TOP) vs delivery, nor gestational age significantly correlated with it. Longer time from pregnancy end to OH significantly improved procedural success in both groups, after TOP (p = 0.025) and in cases of large RPOC after delivery (p < 0.001). Parity significantly altered procedural success only in the delivery group (p < 0.007). The success rate of the procedure was significantly higher in cases when only small RPOC were observed (p < 0.001). Absence of RPOC occurred more frequently following TOP than after delivery (p < 0.001). Procedures in which no RPOC were confirmed were significantly associated with a longer interval between pregnancy end and OH in both TOP (p = 0.013) and delivery group (p = 0.003). Gestational age significantly correlated with the absence of RPOC only in the delivery group (p = 0.003). The likelihood of not confirming RPOC was higher where US thickness and length were lower (p = 0.007 and p = 0.011, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OH is effective for managing RPOC with a high success rate, but the absence of RPOC in a considerable number of OH-treated patients stresses the need for better diagnostic criteria and patient selection to minimize overtreatments. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize the timing and indications for OH.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08075-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Retained products of conception (RPOC) are a common complication following pregnancy. Office hysteroscopy (OH) is increasingly used for diagnostics and management due to its minimally invasive nature. However, incidence of incomplete OH removal and procedures in which no RPOC are identified despite prior suspicion remains a concern. This study aimed to identify factors associated with these outcomes to improve patient selection and procedural success.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients referred for OH for presumed RPOC between August 2015 and April 2023 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. Inclusion criteria included hemodynamically stable patients with prolonged bleeding and/or suspicious ultrasound (US) findings post-pregnancy. Patients with RPOC thickness of more than 30 mm or strong tissue vascularization on US were excluded. Data on patient demographics, US features, and procedural outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Out of the 468 patients, RPOC removal was performed in 333 cases (71.2%), of which 225 (67.6%) were successfully completed, while in 135 cases (28.8%), the procedure was only diagnostic due to the absence of RPOC. Regarding procedural success, neither the pregnancy outcome, i.e., termination of pregnancy (TOP) vs delivery, nor gestational age significantly correlated with it. Longer time from pregnancy end to OH significantly improved procedural success in both groups, after TOP (p = 0.025) and in cases of large RPOC after delivery (p < 0.001). Parity significantly altered procedural success only in the delivery group (p < 0.007). The success rate of the procedure was significantly higher in cases when only small RPOC were observed (p < 0.001). Absence of RPOC occurred more frequently following TOP than after delivery (p < 0.001). Procedures in which no RPOC were confirmed were significantly associated with a longer interval between pregnancy end and OH in both TOP (p = 0.013) and delivery group (p = 0.003). Gestational age significantly correlated with the absence of RPOC only in the delivery group (p = 0.003). The likelihood of not confirming RPOC was higher where US thickness and length were lower (p = 0.007 and p = 0.011, respectively).

Conclusion: OH is effective for managing RPOC with a high success rate, but the absence of RPOC in a considerable number of OH-treated patients stresses the need for better diagnostic criteria and patient selection to minimize overtreatments. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize the timing and indications for OH.

办公室宫腔镜检查妊娠保留产物的有效性:来自468例的见解。
目的:妊娠残留产物(RPOC)是妊娠后常见的并发症。办公室宫腔镜(OH)越来越多地用于诊断和管理,由于其微创的性质。然而,不完全氢氧根切除和手术中未发现RPOC的发生率仍然令人担忧,尽管先前有怀疑。本研究旨在确定与这些结果相关的因素,以改善患者选择和手术成功。方法:对斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那大学医学中心妇产科2015年8月至2023年4月期间因疑似RPOC而转诊OH的患者进行回顾性研究。纳入标准包括妊娠后血流动力学稳定且出血时间延长和/或超声检查结果可疑的患者。排除RPOC厚度大于30mm或US上组织血管化强的患者。分析了患者人口统计学、美国特征和手术结果的数据。结果:468例患者中,333例(71.2%)行RPOC切除,其中225例(67.6%)成功切除,135例(28.8%)因无RPOC而仅诊断。在手术成功率方面,妊娠结局(即终止妊娠(TOP) vs分娩)和胎龄均与手术成功率无关。从妊娠结束到OH的较长时间显著提高了两组的手术成功率,在TOP (p = 0.025)和分娩后RPOC较大的情况下(p < 0.001)。奇偶性仅在分娩组显著改变手术成功率(p < 0.007)。在RPOC很小的情况下,手术成功率明显更高(p < 0.001)。术后RPOC缺失的发生率高于分娩后(p < 0.001)。在TOP组(p = 0.013)和分娩组(p = 0.003)中,未确认RPOC的手术与妊娠结束和OH之间较长的间隔显著相关。仅在分娩组,胎龄与RPOC缺失显著相关(p = 0.003)。当US的厚度和长度较低时,不确认RPOC的可能性较高(分别为p = 0.007和p = 0.011)。结论:OH是治疗RPOC的有效方法,成功率高,但相当多OH治疗的患者缺乏RPOC,这表明需要更好的诊断标准和患者选择,以减少过度治疗。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来优化OH的时机和适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信