Luis F. Andrade, Teresa Ju, Parsa Abdi, Michael R. Anderson, Elise Edwards, Nicole Khalil, Olivia Burke, Daniella Jaguan, Jonathan I. Silverberg
{"title":"Lack of Evidence for the Efficacy of Antifungal Medications to Treat Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review","authors":"Luis F. Andrade, Teresa Ju, Parsa Abdi, Michael R. Anderson, Elise Edwards, Nicole Khalil, Olivia Burke, Daniella Jaguan, Jonathan I. Silverberg","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterised by immune dysregulation and skin-barrier dysfunction, which can predispose to microbial dysbiosis and skin infections. Fungi, particularly Malassezia, are common skin colonisers in AD patients and may exacerbate the condition. Previous studies on the efficacy of antifungal treatments for AD have shown inconsistent results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of topical and oral antifungal therapies in treating AD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022338791). Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, Cochrane, CINAHL, GREAT, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Inclusion criteria encompassed interventional studies using antifungal agents for AD, with outcomes such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 35,591 studies obtained from the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Topical antifungal treatments, such as sertaconazole, miconazole, and ciclopirox olamine, showed minimal efficacy in reducing AD severity when compared to placebo or hydrocortisone treatments. Oral antifungal treatments, including itraconazole and ketoconazole, demonstrated mixed results, with some studies showing modest improvements in SCORAD scores but overall lacking significant clinical benefit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The systematic review found weak evidence supporting the efficacy of both topical and oral antifungal therapies for treating AD. Topical antifungals showed limited improvement and fewer adverse effects, while oral antifungals posed a higher risk of systemic adverse events without consistent efficacy. Based on these findings, antifungal treatments are not recommended for AD severity management alone other than for treatment of comorbid fungal and yeast infections. Future research should focus on larger sample sizes, standardised severity assessments, and comprehensive adverse event reporting to better evaluate antifungal treatments in AD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 2","pages":"400-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.604","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterised by immune dysregulation and skin-barrier dysfunction, which can predispose to microbial dysbiosis and skin infections. Fungi, particularly Malassezia, are common skin colonisers in AD patients and may exacerbate the condition. Previous studies on the efficacy of antifungal treatments for AD have shown inconsistent results.
Objectives
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of topical and oral antifungal therapies in treating AD.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022338791). Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, Cochrane, CINAHL, GREAT, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Inclusion criteria encompassed interventional studies using antifungal agents for AD, with outcomes such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD).
Results
Of 35,591 studies obtained from the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Topical antifungal treatments, such as sertaconazole, miconazole, and ciclopirox olamine, showed minimal efficacy in reducing AD severity when compared to placebo or hydrocortisone treatments. Oral antifungal treatments, including itraconazole and ketoconazole, demonstrated mixed results, with some studies showing modest improvements in SCORAD scores but overall lacking significant clinical benefit.
Conclusions
The systematic review found weak evidence supporting the efficacy of both topical and oral antifungal therapies for treating AD. Topical antifungals showed limited improvement and fewer adverse effects, while oral antifungals posed a higher risk of systemic adverse events without consistent efficacy. Based on these findings, antifungal treatments are not recommended for AD severity management alone other than for treatment of comorbid fungal and yeast infections. Future research should focus on larger sample sizes, standardised severity assessments, and comprehensive adverse event reporting to better evaluate antifungal treatments in AD.