Manon Blaise, Eric Fontas, Barbara Seitz-Polski, Laura Troin, Alexandra Picard, Perrine Rousset, Elodie Long-Mira, Micheline Razzouk-Cadet, Madleen Chassang, Thierry Passeron, Henri Montaudié
{"title":"Real-world experience of adjuvant immunotherapy for stages III–IV melanoma: A monocentric observational study","authors":"Manon Blaise, Eric Fontas, Barbara Seitz-Polski, Laura Troin, Alexandra Picard, Perrine Rousset, Elodie Long-Mira, Micheline Razzouk-Cadet, Madleen Chassang, Thierry Passeron, Henri Montaudié","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Adjuvant immunotherapy (AIO) improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with resected stages III–IV melanoma. Real-world data, especially in elderly patients, as well as optimal management of patients who relpases, are still limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate real-world outcomes of AIO in a cohort of stages III–IV melanoma patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, observational study that included patients treated with AIO (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) for stages III/IV melanoma. The primary endpoint was RFS. Subgroup analyses were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 76 patients were included, with a mean age of 64.6 years (51.3% and 31.6 age ≥65 and ≥75 years, respectively). Majority received nivolumab (67.1%). Median follow-up period was 26.4 months (interquartile range, 17.9–35.1 months). The RFS rates for the whole cohort were 75.8%, 66.0%, 52.9% and 52.9% for 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Patients aged <75 years had a better RFS rate compare to those older ≥75 years (60.4% vs. 38.3% respectively, <i>p </i>= 0.02). A total of 41 patients (53.9%) experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade, and 22.3% of grade 3–5. irAEs ≥ 3 concerned 17.3% of patients aged <75 years and 33.3% for those aged ≥75 years. Thirteen patients (17.1%) had discontinued IO early due to severe irAEs after a median of 2 months (range 1–7). Median time to first recurrence from starting adjuvant programmed cell death 1 was 6.5 months (range, 1–35). Most patients recurred ON adjuvant IO (15/28 patients, 19.7%). Most of the time, first-line therapy after melanoma recurrence was ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Objective response rate was higher for patients with recurrence within 6 months of stopping adjuvant IO (33.3%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Real-world outcomes of AIO for stages III/IV melanoma appeared comparable to clinical trial data. Immunotherapy appears less effective and less well tolerated in elderly patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 2","pages":"425-439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.571","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Adjuvant immunotherapy (AIO) improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with resected stages III–IV melanoma. Real-world data, especially in elderly patients, as well as optimal management of patients who relpases, are still limited.
Objectives
To evaluate real-world outcomes of AIO in a cohort of stages III–IV melanoma patients.
Methods
We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, observational study that included patients treated with AIO (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) for stages III/IV melanoma. The primary endpoint was RFS. Subgroup analyses were performed.
Results
A total of 76 patients were included, with a mean age of 64.6 years (51.3% and 31.6 age ≥65 and ≥75 years, respectively). Majority received nivolumab (67.1%). Median follow-up period was 26.4 months (interquartile range, 17.9–35.1 months). The RFS rates for the whole cohort were 75.8%, 66.0%, 52.9% and 52.9% for 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Patients aged <75 years had a better RFS rate compare to those older ≥75 years (60.4% vs. 38.3% respectively, p = 0.02). A total of 41 patients (53.9%) experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade, and 22.3% of grade 3–5. irAEs ≥ 3 concerned 17.3% of patients aged <75 years and 33.3% for those aged ≥75 years. Thirteen patients (17.1%) had discontinued IO early due to severe irAEs after a median of 2 months (range 1–7). Median time to first recurrence from starting adjuvant programmed cell death 1 was 6.5 months (range, 1–35). Most patients recurred ON adjuvant IO (15/28 patients, 19.7%). Most of the time, first-line therapy after melanoma recurrence was ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Objective response rate was higher for patients with recurrence within 6 months of stopping adjuvant IO (33.3%).
Conclusions
Real-world outcomes of AIO for stages III/IV melanoma appeared comparable to clinical trial data. Immunotherapy appears less effective and less well tolerated in elderly patients.
背景:辅助免疫治疗(AIO)可改善III-IV期黑色素瘤切除患者的无复发生存率(RFS)。现实世界的数据,特别是老年患者的数据,以及对复发患者的最佳管理仍然有限。目的评估AIO在III-IV期黑色素瘤患者队列中的实际结果。方法:我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究,纳入了使用AIO (nivolumab或pembrolizumab)治疗III/IV期黑色素瘤的患者。主要终点为RFS。进行亚组分析。结果共纳入76例患者,平均年龄64.6岁(年龄≥65岁占51.3%,≥75岁占31.6)。大多数患者接受纳武单抗治疗(67.1%)。中位随访时间为26.4个月(四分位数间距为17.9-35.1个月)。整个队列1年、2年、3年和4年的RFS率分别为75.8%、66.0%、52.9%和52.9%。75岁患者的RFS率高于≥75岁患者(60.4% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.02)。共有41名患者(53.9%)经历了任何级别的免疫相关不良事件(irae),其中3-5级占22.3%。≥3的irAEs占75岁患者的17.3%,≥75岁患者的33.3%。13例患者(17.1%)在中位2个月后(范围1-7个月)因严重的irAEs而提前停止IO治疗。从开始辅助程序性细胞死亡到首次复发的中位时间为6.5个月(范围1 - 35)。大多数患者复发为ON辅助IO(15/28例,19.7%)。大多数情况下,黑色素瘤复发后的一线治疗是伊匹单抗加纳武单抗。停药后6个月内复发的患者客观缓解率更高(33.3%)。结论:AIO治疗III/IV期黑色素瘤的实际结果与临床试验数据相当。免疫治疗在老年患者中效果较差,耐受性较差。