Lívian de S. Gonçalves, Luíza M. A. Tanus, Lucas A. Queiroz, Jonathan C. Dall'Acqua, Carlos Alberto Campello, Paula C. Nogueira
{"title":"Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Mitral Annular Disjunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lívian de S. Gonçalves, Luíza M. A. Tanus, Lucas A. Queiroz, Jonathan C. Dall'Acqua, Carlos Alberto Campello, Paula C. Nogueira","doi":"10.1111/echo.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) frequently co-occurs with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). It is unclear, however, whether MAD is associated with an additional risk of arrhythmogenic events in patients with MVP. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of complex ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with MAD compared to those without MAD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies evaluating the incidence of complex VA and the composite outcome of complex VA and SCD among patients with versus without MAD. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to pool odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 16 studies comprising 6001 patients, of whom 23% had MAD; 41% were female; the mean age was 56.5 years. MVP was significantly present in both groups, with a higher prevalence in the MAD group in 1030 patients (74.5%) with MAD and in 1942 patients (47%) without MAD. The incidence of complex VA was significantly higher in patients with MAD (OR 3.88; 95% CI 1.69–8.93; <i>p</i> = 0.001), compared with patients without MAD. Patients with MAD also had a higher risk of the composite outcome of complex VA and SCD (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.94–3.24; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) (OR 3.13; 95% CI 1.38–7.11; <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this meta-analysis, the presence of MAD was significantly associated with the development of complex VA and the composite outcome of complex VA and SCD. The outcome of SCD was not evaluated as an isolated endpoint.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) frequently co-occurs with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). It is unclear, however, whether MAD is associated with an additional risk of arrhythmogenic events in patients with MVP. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of complex ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with MAD compared to those without MAD.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies evaluating the incidence of complex VA and the composite outcome of complex VA and SCD among patients with versus without MAD. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to pool odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
We included 16 studies comprising 6001 patients, of whom 23% had MAD; 41% were female; the mean age was 56.5 years. MVP was significantly present in both groups, with a higher prevalence in the MAD group in 1030 patients (74.5%) with MAD and in 1942 patients (47%) without MAD. The incidence of complex VA was significantly higher in patients with MAD (OR 3.88; 95% CI 1.69–8.93; p = 0.001), compared with patients without MAD. Patients with MAD also had a higher risk of the composite outcome of complex VA and SCD (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.94–3.24; p < 0.00001) (OR 3.13; 95% CI 1.38–7.11; p = 0.006).
Conclusion
In this meta-analysis, the presence of MAD was significantly associated with the development of complex VA and the composite outcome of complex VA and SCD. The outcome of SCD was not evaluated as an isolated endpoint.
目的:二尖瓣环分离(MAD)常与二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)并发。然而,目前尚不清楚MAD是否与MVP患者发生心律失常事件的额外风险相关。我们的目的是评估与非MAD患者相比,MAD患者的复杂室性心律失常(VA)和心源性猝死(SCD)的发生率。方法我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,以评估患有与未患有MAD的患者中复杂VA的发生率以及复杂VA和SCD的综合结局。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以95%置信区间合并优势比(OR)和风险比(HR)。我们纳入了16项研究,包括6001例患者,其中23%患有MAD;41%是女性;平均年龄为56.5岁。两组均显著存在MVP, MAD组1030例MAD患者(74.5%)和1942例非MAD患者(47%)的患病率较高。复合VA的发生率在MAD患者中明显更高(OR 3.88;95% ci 1.69-8.93;p = 0.001),与非MAD患者相比。MAD患者发生复合VA和SCD复合结局的风险也较高(HR 2.51;95% ci 1.94-3.24;p & lt;0.00001)(或3.13;95% ci 1.38-7.11;P = 0.006)。结论在本荟萃分析中,MAD的存在与复合VA的发展以及复合VA和SCD的复合结局显著相关。SCD的结局没有作为一个孤立的终点进行评估。
期刊介绍:
Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.