Translation of Animal Study to Human: In Silico Based Development of Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Leonid Goubergrits, Pavlo Yevtushenko, Adriano Schlief, Jan Romberg, Titus Kuehne, Andreas Arndt, Jan Bruening
{"title":"Translation of Animal Study to Human: In Silico Based Development of Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor","authors":"Leonid Goubergrits,&nbsp;Pavlo Yevtushenko,&nbsp;Adriano Schlief,&nbsp;Jan Romberg,&nbsp;Titus Kuehne,&nbsp;Andreas Arndt,&nbsp;Jan Bruening","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors (PAPS) might impose a flow-induced risk of thrombus formation in the pulmonary artery (PA). To assess this risk, an in silico study-enhanced animal study with 20 sensors implanted in 10 pigs had previously been conducted. In the in silico study, PAPS were virtually implanted mimicking real implantations, based upon data acquired by CT. This animal in silico study investigated changes in hemodynamics caused by PAPS using image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, porcine and human PA differ significantly in geometry and hemodynamics. To investigate the transferability of animal in silico study findings toward human conditions, we propose a parallel in silico human study. Based on a similarity analysis (L1 norm for 8 geometric features) human PA geometries with the least difference to 10 porcine PA were selected. PAPS were virtually implanted in human PA as close as possible, mimicking the implantation configuration of the animal study. Finally, a numerical flow analysis of the hemodynamic changes due to PAPS implantation was done. Comparing human and porcine PA, we found significantly larger left and right PA diameters in humans, whereas no differences were found for main PA diameters and bifurcation angle. Comparing hemodynamic boundary conditions, we found a significantly smaller heart rate and a significantly higher peak systolic main PA flow rate in humans, whereas no significant differences for cardiac output were found. The human in silico PAPS study found no relevant changes in hemodynamics increasing the risk of thrombus formation after sensor implantation. This is also valid for PAPS that were non-optimally implanted. Thus, despite differences between species, findings of the in silico animal study were confirmed by the human in silico study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors (PAPS) might impose a flow-induced risk of thrombus formation in the pulmonary artery (PA). To assess this risk, an in silico study-enhanced animal study with 20 sensors implanted in 10 pigs had previously been conducted. In the in silico study, PAPS were virtually implanted mimicking real implantations, based upon data acquired by CT. This animal in silico study investigated changes in hemodynamics caused by PAPS using image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, porcine and human PA differ significantly in geometry and hemodynamics. To investigate the transferability of animal in silico study findings toward human conditions, we propose a parallel in silico human study. Based on a similarity analysis (L1 norm for 8 geometric features) human PA geometries with the least difference to 10 porcine PA were selected. PAPS were virtually implanted in human PA as close as possible, mimicking the implantation configuration of the animal study. Finally, a numerical flow analysis of the hemodynamic changes due to PAPS implantation was done. Comparing human and porcine PA, we found significantly larger left and right PA diameters in humans, whereas no differences were found for main PA diameters and bifurcation angle. Comparing hemodynamic boundary conditions, we found a significantly smaller heart rate and a significantly higher peak systolic main PA flow rate in humans, whereas no significant differences for cardiac output were found. The human in silico PAPS study found no relevant changes in hemodynamics increasing the risk of thrombus formation after sensor implantation. This is also valid for PAPS that were non-optimally implanted. Thus, despite differences between species, findings of the in silico animal study were confirmed by the human in silico study.

Abstract Image

动物研究向人类的转化:基于硅片的植入式肺动脉压力传感器的研制
植入式肺动脉压力传感器(PAPS)可能会造成血流诱导的肺动脉血栓形成风险(PA)。为了评估这种风险,先前进行了一项在10头猪体内植入20个传感器的计算机研究增强动物研究。在计算机研究中,基于CT获得的数据,模拟真实植入,虚拟植入PAPS。本实验利用基于图像的计算流体动力学(CFD)研究了PAPS引起的血流动力学变化。然而,猪和人的PA在几何形状和血流动力学上有显著差异。为了研究动物计算机研究结果在人类条件下的可转移性,我们提出了一个并行的计算机人体研究。基于相似度分析(8个几何特征L1范数),选择了与10个猪PA差异最小的人PA几何特征。模拟动物实验的植入配置,将PAPS尽可能接近地植入人类PA。最后,对PAPS植入后的血流动力学变化进行了数值分析。比较人和猪的肺动脉,我们发现人的左、右肺动脉直径明显大于猪的左、右肺动脉直径,而主肺动脉直径和分岔角没有差异。比较血流动力学边界条件,我们发现人类的心率明显更小,收缩期主动脉血流量峰值明显更高,而心输出量没有明显差异。人体计算机PAPS研究未发现传感器植入后血流动力学的相关变化会增加血栓形成的风险。这也适用于非最佳植入的PAPS。因此,尽管物种之间存在差异,但计算机动物研究的结果得到了人类计算机研究的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信