Martin Menendez-Coccoz, Diego H. Rotili, María E. Otegui, Gustavo Martini, María Paolini, Carlos Di Bella, Gervasio Piñeiro, Martín Oesterheld
{"title":"Low-input, interpretable models to forecast maize yield at multiple scales based on absorbed radiation","authors":"Martin Menendez-Coccoz, Diego H. Rotili, María E. Otegui, Gustavo Martini, María Paolini, Carlos Di Bella, Gervasio Piñeiro, Martín Oesterheld","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most crop yield forecast models operate at coarse scales (e.g., county or region) or need extensive input data for finer resolutions. Here, we present maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) yield forecast models that require minimal user data and operate at field and regional scales throughout the growing season. Using 1853 maize field-years in Argentina, with known location, sowing date, and yield, our models leveraged absorbed radiation (from satellite imagery), temperature-based phenology, regional site-year properties, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase predictions, and sowing period. At the field scale, our models achieved high accuracy at physiological maturity, with a mean error of 1 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (16%). Yield forecasts were mainly driven by absorbed radiation during the reproductive phase and a regional factor. Early-season forecasts incorporated ENSO and sowing period, but with reduced accuracy. When scaled to regional forecasts, the models performed even better, with a mean error of 0.3 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (4%). These results combine a novel case of yield forecast because of the low data requirements from users, high anticipation (30–90 days before harvest), and good levels of accuracy at both field and regional scales. Additionally, the models’ interpretability makes them valuable diagnostic tools for post-season analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most crop yield forecast models operate at coarse scales (e.g., county or region) or need extensive input data for finer resolutions. Here, we present maize (Zea mays L.) yield forecast models that require minimal user data and operate at field and regional scales throughout the growing season. Using 1853 maize field-years in Argentina, with known location, sowing date, and yield, our models leveraged absorbed radiation (from satellite imagery), temperature-based phenology, regional site-year properties, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase predictions, and sowing period. At the field scale, our models achieved high accuracy at physiological maturity, with a mean error of 1 t ha−1 (16%). Yield forecasts were mainly driven by absorbed radiation during the reproductive phase and a regional factor. Early-season forecasts incorporated ENSO and sowing period, but with reduced accuracy. When scaled to regional forecasts, the models performed even better, with a mean error of 0.3 t ha−1 (4%). These results combine a novel case of yield forecast because of the low data requirements from users, high anticipation (30–90 days before harvest), and good levels of accuracy at both field and regional scales. Additionally, the models’ interpretability makes them valuable diagnostic tools for post-season analysis.
大多数作物产量预测模型以粗尺度(例如,县或地区)运行,或者需要大量输入数据以获得更精细的分辨率。在这里,我们提出了玉米(Zea mays L.)产量预测模型,该模型需要最少的用户数据,并在整个生长季节在田间和区域尺度上运行。利用阿根廷1853年的玉米田,已知地点、播种日期和产量,我们的模型利用了吸收辐射(来自卫星图像)、基于温度的物候学、区域站点年特性、El Niño-Southern涛动(ENSO)阶段预测和播种期。在野外尺度上,我们的模型在生理成熟时获得了很高的精度,平均误差为1 t ha - 1(16%)。产量预测主要受繁殖期吸收辐射和区域因子的影响。季前预报纳入了ENSO和播种期,但准确性较低。当按比例进行区域预测时,模型的表现甚至更好,平均误差为0.3 t / ha - 1(4%)。这些结果结合了一个新的产量预测案例,因为用户对数据的要求低,预期高(收获前30-90天),并且在田间和区域尺度上都具有较高的准确性。此外,这些模型的可解释性使它们成为赛季后分析的宝贵诊断工具。
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.