Silvia Mezi, Andrea Botticelli, Giulia Pomati, Simone Scagnoli, Giulia Fiscon, Federica de Galitiis, Francesca Romana di Pietro, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Sasan Amirhassankhani, Giovanna Gentile, Maurizio Simmaco, Bjoern Gohlke, Robert Preissner, Daniele Santini, Paolo Marchetti
{"title":"Impact of Drug–Drug Interactions on Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated With Combined BRAF/MEK Inhibitors: A Real-World Study","authors":"Silvia Mezi, Andrea Botticelli, Giulia Pomati, Simone Scagnoli, Giulia Fiscon, Federica de Galitiis, Francesca Romana di Pietro, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Sasan Amirhassankhani, Giovanna Gentile, Maurizio Simmaco, Bjoern Gohlke, Robert Preissner, Daniele Santini, Paolo Marchetti","doi":"10.1111/pcmr.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The unique pharmacokinetics of BRAF and MEK inhibitors make patients vulnerable to drug–drug interactions (DDIs), which may compromise treatment efficacy in metastatic melanoma. This study evaluates the impact of DDIs on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. This multicenter, observational, retrospective study assessed DDIs using the Drug-PIN software. Associations between the Drug-PIN continuous score, Drug-PIN light, and treatment outscomes were analyzed along with the specific drugs involved in the DDIs. A total of 177 patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma undergoing BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy were included. Of these, 94 patients (55.9%) were exposed to complex drug regimens related to comorbidities, supportive care, and symptom management. A significant change in Drug-PIN scores was observed before and after therapy initiation. Patients with low-grade DDIs demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with high-grade DDIs (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.0045 and <i>p</i> = 0.012, respectively); this observation was further validated by multiple regression analysis. By combining clinical and DDI data, we identified four patient subgroups with distinct prognoses, showing statistically significant differences in OS and PFS (log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The subgroup with the highest clinical risk and high DDI had markedly poorer outcomes (HR 2.87, 95% CI [1.7–4.8], <i>p</i> < 0.001). The drugs involved in high-level pharmacological interactions were analyzed. DDIs significantly contribute to poorer OS and PFS outcomes, independent of other clinical risk factors. Optimizing pharmacological regimens to minimize DDIs should be prioritized to enhance treatment efficacy in oncology. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to further validate the advantages of individualized, preemptive therapy optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":219,"journal":{"name":"Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pcmr.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pcmr.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The unique pharmacokinetics of BRAF and MEK inhibitors make patients vulnerable to drug–drug interactions (DDIs), which may compromise treatment efficacy in metastatic melanoma. This study evaluates the impact of DDIs on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. This multicenter, observational, retrospective study assessed DDIs using the Drug-PIN software. Associations between the Drug-PIN continuous score, Drug-PIN light, and treatment outscomes were analyzed along with the specific drugs involved in the DDIs. A total of 177 patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma undergoing BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy were included. Of these, 94 patients (55.9%) were exposed to complex drug regimens related to comorbidities, supportive care, and symptom management. A significant change in Drug-PIN scores was observed before and after therapy initiation. Patients with low-grade DDIs demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with high-grade DDIs (log-rank p = 0.0045 and p = 0.012, respectively); this observation was further validated by multiple regression analysis. By combining clinical and DDI data, we identified four patient subgroups with distinct prognoses, showing statistically significant differences in OS and PFS (log-rank p < 0.0001). The subgroup with the highest clinical risk and high DDI had markedly poorer outcomes (HR 2.87, 95% CI [1.7–4.8], p < 0.001). The drugs involved in high-level pharmacological interactions were analyzed. DDIs significantly contribute to poorer OS and PFS outcomes, independent of other clinical risk factors. Optimizing pharmacological regimens to minimize DDIs should be prioritized to enhance treatment efficacy in oncology. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to further validate the advantages of individualized, preemptive therapy optimization.
BRAF和MEK抑制剂独特的药代动力学使患者容易受到药物-药物相互作用(ddi)的影响,这可能会影响转移性黑色素瘤的治疗效果。本研究评估ddi对BRAF/MEK抑制剂治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者临床结果的影响。这项多中心、观察性、回顾性研究使用Drug-PIN软件评估ddi。我们分析了Drug-PIN连续评分、Drug-PIN光照和治疗结果之间的关系,并分析了ddi中涉及的特定药物。共纳入177例接受BRAF/MEK抑制剂治疗的BRAF突变转移性黑色素瘤患者。其中,94名患者(55.9%)接受了与合并症、支持性治疗和症状管理相关的复杂药物治疗方案。在治疗开始前后观察到药物pin评分的显著变化。与高级别ddi患者相比,低级别ddi患者的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)明显更长(log-rank p = 0.0045和p = 0.012);多元回归分析进一步验证了这一观察结果。通过结合临床和DDI数据,我们确定了四个预后不同的患者亚组,OS和PFS的差异具有统计学意义(log-rank p < 0.0001)。临床风险最高且DDI高的亚组预后明显较差(HR 2.87, 95% CI [1.7-4.8], p < 0.001)。分析了涉及高水平药理相互作用的药物。ddi显著导致较差的OS和PFS结果,独立于其他临床危险因素。优化药物方案以减少ddi应优先考虑,以提高治疗效果在肿瘤。前瞻性临床试验是必要的,以进一步验证个体化,先发制人的治疗优化的优势。
期刊介绍:
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Researchpublishes manuscripts on all aspects of pigment cells including development, cell and molecular biology, genetics, diseases of pigment cells including melanoma. Papers that provide insights into the causes and progression of melanoma including the process of metastasis and invasion, proliferation, senescence, apoptosis or gene regulation are especially welcome, as are papers that use the melanocyte system to answer questions of general biological relevance. Papers that are purely descriptive or make only minor advances to our knowledge of pigment cells or melanoma in particular are not suitable for this journal. Keywords
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, cell biology, melatonin, biochemistry, chemistry, comparative biology, dermatology, developmental biology, genetics, hormones, intracellular signalling, melanoma, molecular biology, ocular and extracutaneous melanin, pharmacology, photobiology, physics, pigmentary disorders