C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index as an Independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ye Deng, Jianya Huang, Li Deng, Yuxuan Zhou, Lu Pan, Jingyi Wang, Qianwen Chen, Qingqing Gu, Yang Zhang, Jun Wei, Ruxing Wang, Ling Sun, Yuan Ji, Qingjie Wang
{"title":"C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index as an Independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence","authors":"Ye Deng,&nbsp;Jianya Huang,&nbsp;Li Deng,&nbsp;Yuxuan Zhou,&nbsp;Lu Pan,&nbsp;Jingyi Wang,&nbsp;Qianwen Chen,&nbsp;Qingqing Gu,&nbsp;Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Jun Wei,&nbsp;Ruxing Wang,&nbsp;Ling Sun,&nbsp;Yuan Ji,&nbsp;Qingjie Wang","doi":"10.1002/clc.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation remains a clinical challenge despite guideline-recommended efficacy. Emerging evidence implicates inflammatory biomarkers in predicting arrhythmia recurrence. This study investigated the novel CALLY index, a composite inflammatory marker, as a prognostic indicator for postablation AF recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this prospective cohort study, 556 consecutive AF patients undergoing catheter ablation (June 2018–June 2023) were stratified into recurrence and sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance groups. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses evaluated associations between the CALLY index and recurrence risk. Predictive accuracy was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over a median 12-month follow-up, 102 patients (18.3%) experienced recurrence. The SR group exhibited significantly higher CALLY indices than the recurrence group (3.24 ± 1.68 vs. 1.89 ± 0.57; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Univariate Cox regression identified the CALLY index as inversely associated with recurrence (HR: 0.439, 95% CI: 0.292–0.659; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with persistence after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.887, 95% CI: 0.789–0.956; <i>p</i> = 0.031). Tertile-based stratification revealed a 29% lower recurrence risk in the high-CALLY group versus the low-CALLY group (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68–0.76; <i>p</i> = 0.017). ROC analysis demonstrated optimal discrimination at a CALLY threshold ≥ 1.433 (AUC: 0.7899; sensitivity: 76.4%; specificity: 74.8%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The CALLY index independently predicts AF recurrence postablation, offering potential utility in risk stratification. These findings support its integration into clinical decision-making to optimize post-procedural management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation remains a clinical challenge despite guideline-recommended efficacy. Emerging evidence implicates inflammatory biomarkers in predicting arrhythmia recurrence. This study investigated the novel CALLY index, a composite inflammatory marker, as a prognostic indicator for postablation AF recurrence.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 556 consecutive AF patients undergoing catheter ablation (June 2018–June 2023) were stratified into recurrence and sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance groups. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses evaluated associations between the CALLY index and recurrence risk. Predictive accuracy was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Over a median 12-month follow-up, 102 patients (18.3%) experienced recurrence. The SR group exhibited significantly higher CALLY indices than the recurrence group (3.24 ± 1.68 vs. 1.89 ± 0.57; p < 0.001). Univariate Cox regression identified the CALLY index as inversely associated with recurrence (HR: 0.439, 95% CI: 0.292–0.659; p < 0.001), with persistence after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.887, 95% CI: 0.789–0.956; p = 0.031). Tertile-based stratification revealed a 29% lower recurrence risk in the high-CALLY group versus the low-CALLY group (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68–0.76; p = 0.017). ROC analysis demonstrated optimal discrimination at a CALLY threshold ≥ 1.433 (AUC: 0.7899; sensitivity: 76.4%; specificity: 74.8%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The CALLY index independently predicts AF recurrence postablation, offering potential utility in risk stratification. These findings support its integration into clinical decision-making to optimize post-procedural management.

Abstract Image

c反应蛋白-白蛋白-淋巴细胞(CALLY)指数是房颤术后复发的独立危险因素
背景:导管消融后房颤(AF)复发仍然是一个临床挑战,尽管指南推荐疗效。新出现的证据暗示炎症生物标志物在预测心律失常复发。本研究探讨了一种新的CALLY指数,一种复合炎症标志物,作为房颤消融后复发的预后指标。方法在这项前瞻性队列研究中,556例连续接受导管消融的房颤患者(2018年6月至2023年6月)被分为复发组和窦性心律(SR)维持组。Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier分析评估了CALLY指数与复发风险之间的关系。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估预测准确性。结果中位随访12个月,102例(18.3%)复发。SR组CALLY指数明显高于复发组(3.24±1.68∶1.89±0.57;p < 0.001)。单因素Cox回归发现CALLY指数与复发率呈负相关(HR: 0.439, 95% CI: 0.292-0.659;p < 0.001),多变量调整后持续存在(HR: 0.887, 95% CI: 0.789-0.956;p = 0.031)。基于三级的分层显示,与低cally组相比,高cally组复发风险降低29% (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76;p = 0.017)。ROC分析显示,CALLY阈值≥1.433 (AUC: 0.7899;灵敏度:76.4%;特异性:74.8%;p < 0.001)。结论CALLY指数独立预测房颤消融后复发,在风险分层中具有潜在的实用价值。这些发现支持将其整合到临床决策中,以优化术后管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信