Right Heart Contrast Echocardiography Microbubble Count and Migraine Severity: A Dose–Effect Relationship Study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Haijuan Gu, Wenjun Fan, Jiesheng Xia, Jianwei Shi
{"title":"Right Heart Contrast Echocardiography Microbubble Count and Migraine Severity: A Dose–Effect Relationship Study","authors":"Haijuan Gu,&nbsp;Wenjun Fan,&nbsp;Jiesheng Xia,&nbsp;Jianwei Shi","doi":"10.1002/clc.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate whether a dose–effect relationship exists between the number of microbubbles detected on right heart contrast echocardiography (RHCE) and the clinical severity of migraine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional study of 190 adult patients diagnosed with migraine who underwent RHCE. Microbubble counts were categorized into four grades per frame (Grades 0–III) based on their appearance in the left atrium within three to six cardiac cycles after right atrial opacification. Migraine severity was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between microbubble grades and migraine severity. The predictive ability of the model was assessed using the residual plots and variance inflation factors. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the findings by adjusting for potential confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A clear dose–response relationship was identified, with patients in higher microbubble-grade groups demonstrating significantly elevated MIDAS and HIT-6 scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients with Grade III microbubbles reported the highest mean MIDAS (18.2 ± 6.1) and HIT-6 (64.8 ± 4.9) scores, compared to those in lower grades (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Regression analyses confirmed that the higher microbubble burden independently predicted migraine severity (<i>β</i> = 0.46, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggest a notable dose–effect relationship between RHCE microbubble count and migraine severity. These findings highlight the potential role of right-to-left shunting as a physiological contributor to migraine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate whether a dose–effect relationship exists between the number of microbubbles detected on right heart contrast echocardiography (RHCE) and the clinical severity of migraine.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 190 adult patients diagnosed with migraine who underwent RHCE. Microbubble counts were categorized into four grades per frame (Grades 0–III) based on their appearance in the left atrium within three to six cardiac cycles after right atrial opacification. Migraine severity was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between microbubble grades and migraine severity. The predictive ability of the model was assessed using the residual plots and variance inflation factors. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the findings by adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

A clear dose–response relationship was identified, with patients in higher microbubble-grade groups demonstrating significantly elevated MIDAS and HIT-6 scores (p < 0.001). Patients with Grade III microbubbles reported the highest mean MIDAS (18.2 ± 6.1) and HIT-6 (64.8 ± 4.9) scores, compared to those in lower grades (p < 0.001). Regression analyses confirmed that the higher microbubble burden independently predicted migraine severity (β = 0.46, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings.

Conclusion

Our results suggest a notable dose–effect relationship between RHCE microbubble count and migraine severity. These findings highlight the potential role of right-to-left shunting as a physiological contributor to migraine.

Abstract Image

右心超声造影微泡计数与偏头痛严重程度:剂量效应关系研究
目的探讨右心超声造影(RHCE)微泡数与偏头痛临床严重程度之间是否存在剂量效应关系。方法:我们对190例诊断为偏头痛并接受RHCE治疗的成年患者进行了横断面研究。根据右心房混浊后3 - 6个心动周期内左心房微泡的出现情况,每帧微泡计数分为4级(0-III级)。使用偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)评分和头痛影响测试(HIT-6)评估偏头痛严重程度。采用多元线性回归评价微泡分级与偏头痛严重程度之间的关系。利用残差图和方差膨胀因子对模型的预测能力进行了评价。通过调整潜在混杂因素,进行敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。结果发现明显的剂量-反应关系,较高微泡等级组患者的MIDAS和HIT-6评分显著升高(p < 0.001)。与低级别患者相比,III级微泡患者的平均MIDAS(18.2±6.1)和HIT-6(64.8±4.9)评分最高(p < 0.001)。回归分析证实,较高的微泡负荷独立预测偏头痛的严重程度(β = 0.46, p < 0.001)。敏感性分析得出了一致的结果。结论RHCE微泡计数与偏头痛严重程度之间存在显著的剂量效应关系。这些发现强调了从右到左分流作为偏头痛的生理因素的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信