“I Forgave Life, Not My Father”: Justice in Forgiveness Narratives

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Anne Haikola
{"title":"“I Forgave Life, Not My Father”: Justice in Forgiveness Narratives","authors":"Anne Haikola","doi":"10.1002/casp.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forgiveness and justice have often been seen as incompatible. However, research findings on forgiveness and justice are mixed. The present study investigated the experiences of justice in the forgiveness narratives of 22 Finnish adults, applying McAdams's life story interview method. Bamberg's narrative positioning analysis was used as a theoretical framework, identifying these theory-driven self-positions: (1) discovering the maturing self, (2) embracing the benevolent self, (3) drawing the self's boundaries of forgiveness and (4) externalising the self's justice. Participants constructions of justice were varied and complex, depending on where they were in their forgiveness process. Initially, the self was positioned as experiencing great injustice and unforgiveness, but as the process continued, this was reversed. The participants' diverse positions reflected negotiation and reconciliation with cultural teachings of forgiveness and justice; especially balancing Christian self-sacrifice with forgiveness, and forgiveness for one's own good. The results suggest that forgiveness and justice are not opposites: participants had active agency in defining what justice meant to them and what was forgivable and unforgivable. Future studies could explore the possibilities of forgiveness in retributive and restorative justice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forgiveness and justice have often been seen as incompatible. However, research findings on forgiveness and justice are mixed. The present study investigated the experiences of justice in the forgiveness narratives of 22 Finnish adults, applying McAdams's life story interview method. Bamberg's narrative positioning analysis was used as a theoretical framework, identifying these theory-driven self-positions: (1) discovering the maturing self, (2) embracing the benevolent self, (3) drawing the self's boundaries of forgiveness and (4) externalising the self's justice. Participants constructions of justice were varied and complex, depending on where they were in their forgiveness process. Initially, the self was positioned as experiencing great injustice and unforgiveness, but as the process continued, this was reversed. The participants' diverse positions reflected negotiation and reconciliation with cultural teachings of forgiveness and justice; especially balancing Christian self-sacrifice with forgiveness, and forgiveness for one's own good. The results suggest that forgiveness and justice are not opposites: participants had active agency in defining what justice meant to them and what was forgivable and unforgivable. Future studies could explore the possibilities of forgiveness in retributive and restorative justice settings.

“我原谅了生命,而不是我的父亲”:宽恕叙事中的正义
宽恕和正义常常被认为是不相容的。然而,关于宽恕和正义的研究结果喜忧参半。本研究采用麦克亚当斯的生活故事访谈法,对22名芬兰成年人的宽恕叙事中的正义体验进行了调查。班伯格的叙事定位分析被用作理论框架,确定了这些理论驱动的自我定位:(1)发现成熟的自我,(2)拥抱仁慈的自我,(3)绘制自我宽恕的边界,(4)将自我的正义外化。参与者对正义的理解是多样而复杂的,这取决于他们在宽恕过程中的位置。最初,自我被定位为经历巨大的不公正和不宽恕,但随着过程的继续,这被逆转了。参与者的不同立场反映了宽恕和正义的文化教义的谈判与和解;尤其是平衡基督徒的自我牺牲和宽恕,以及为了自己的利益而宽恕。结果表明,宽恕和正义并不是对立的:参与者在定义正义对他们意味着什么以及什么是可以原谅的和不可原谅的方面具有积极的能动性。未来的研究可以探索宽恕在报复性和恢复性司法环境中的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信