{"title":"Comparative assessment of various passenger vehicles with alternative fuels including hydrogen","authors":"Ali Erdogan Karaca, Ibrahim Dincer","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the fuel economy and emission ratios of C-segment cars comparatively concerning the consumed fuel types. The energy required for specific driving conditions is calculated, and corresponding emission ratios and fuel costs are investigated. Aerodynamic and performance characteristics that are considered in the analysis are presented in detail. In the comparative analysis, diesel and gasoline fuels are included, and biomethane, battery electric, and hydrogen are evaluated for cleaner and economically feasible road transportation options. In all scenarios, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are evaluated as the lowest well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emitting options, followed by battery electric and biomethane. In terms of fuel economy comparisons in US$, battery electric vehicles offer the lowest fuel cost corresponding to $2.34 for C-segment cars per 100 km of driving range. It is observed that hydrogen is a cost competitive option compared to conventional fuel types as long as the targeted green hydrogen production cost of $6/kg H<sub>2</sub> is accomplished, which is set as a very near-future goal for green hydrogen economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 104386"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825002176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the fuel economy and emission ratios of C-segment cars comparatively concerning the consumed fuel types. The energy required for specific driving conditions is calculated, and corresponding emission ratios and fuel costs are investigated. Aerodynamic and performance characteristics that are considered in the analysis are presented in detail. In the comparative analysis, diesel and gasoline fuels are included, and biomethane, battery electric, and hydrogen are evaluated for cleaner and economically feasible road transportation options. In all scenarios, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are evaluated as the lowest well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emitting options, followed by battery electric and biomethane. In terms of fuel economy comparisons in US$, battery electric vehicles offer the lowest fuel cost corresponding to $2.34 for C-segment cars per 100 km of driving range. It is observed that hydrogen is a cost competitive option compared to conventional fuel types as long as the targeted green hydrogen production cost of $6/kg H2 is accomplished, which is set as a very near-future goal for green hydrogen economy.
期刊介绍:
Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.