Qi Ding , Xiujuan Shan , Xianshi Jin , Harry Gorfine , Jiting Sun
{"title":"Measuring the performance of marine fisheries in China based on two representative case studies","authors":"Qi Ding , Xiujuan Shan , Xianshi Jin , Harry Gorfine , Jiting Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing fisheries performance along ecological, social, economic, and institutional dimensions is crucial to comprehensively understanding the impact of management reforms on the current state of fish stocks and fishery sustainability. Using official fishery statistics, scientific survey data, and expert assessments, this study evaluates the performance of two representative marine fisheries in China, including the anchovy (<em>Engraulis japonicus</em>) fishery in Shandong and the mantis shrimp (<em>Oratosquilla oratoria</em>) fishery managed under a catch quota system in Tianjin. Results showed that the SAT-fish tool offered more comprehensive results when compared with FPIs applied to fisheries in China. The mantis shrimp fishery had better ecological, economic, and governance outcomes but both fisheries had very high social performance. Comparing the performance of the studied fisheries with the global top 10 % performing fisheries revealed that the mantis shrimp fishery was doing relatively well in twelve out of the sixteen dimensions, with strong management measures have been put in place. In contrast, improvements are needed especially in the Governance pillar of the anchovy fishery. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of these marine fisheries, useful in guiding and prioritizing the planning of policies by taking into consideration weaknesses identified in each of the dimensions that we evaluated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 107779"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125002418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assessing fisheries performance along ecological, social, economic, and institutional dimensions is crucial to comprehensively understanding the impact of management reforms on the current state of fish stocks and fishery sustainability. Using official fishery statistics, scientific survey data, and expert assessments, this study evaluates the performance of two representative marine fisheries in China, including the anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) fishery in Shandong and the mantis shrimp (Oratosquilla oratoria) fishery managed under a catch quota system in Tianjin. Results showed that the SAT-fish tool offered more comprehensive results when compared with FPIs applied to fisheries in China. The mantis shrimp fishery had better ecological, economic, and governance outcomes but both fisheries had very high social performance. Comparing the performance of the studied fisheries with the global top 10 % performing fisheries revealed that the mantis shrimp fishery was doing relatively well in twelve out of the sixteen dimensions, with strong management measures have been put in place. In contrast, improvements are needed especially in the Governance pillar of the anchovy fishery. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of these marine fisheries, useful in guiding and prioritizing the planning of policies by taking into consideration weaknesses identified in each of the dimensions that we evaluated.
期刊介绍:
Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels.
We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts.
Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.