Processability and physicochemical properties of plant-based dispersions formulated with oat, pea, and potato concentrates intended for the production of yoghurt analogues

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ilianna Drositi , Giovanni Barone , Claus Heiner Bang-Berthelsen , Lilia Ahrné
{"title":"Processability and physicochemical properties of plant-based dispersions formulated with oat, pea, and potato concentrates intended for the production of yoghurt analogues","authors":"Ilianna Drositi ,&nbsp;Giovanni Barone ,&nbsp;Claus Heiner Bang-Berthelsen ,&nbsp;Lilia Ahrné","doi":"10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The demand for plant-based fermented products with similar nutritional, textural, and functional properties to dairy yoghurts is increasing. Generally, plant-based products are formulated using one single protein-based ingredient source. The combination of ingredients from different plant sources, such as oats, peas, and potatoes can overcome challenges related to nutritional value, physicochemical stability, and processability of plant-based foods. The study aims to determine the feasibility of combining pea and potato concentrates and oat flour for formulating plant-based dispersions to be used for fermentation regarding their processability and physicochemical properties. An experimental design was employed to create a variety of plant-based formulations (PBFs) at 3 % (w/w) protein. Oat-dominant PBFs had viscosity values ranging from 1141 to 871 mPa s, similar to high solid dairy counterparts (e.g., Greek-style yoghurts). In contrast, potato-dominant PBFs had significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) viscosity, similar to drinkable-like yoghurts or Kefir. The dominance of pea ingredients resulted in PBFs having intermediate viscosity, high net z-potential (−37 mV ± 4.04), and higher buffering capacity when compared to other PBFs. The insights of this study and the empirical predicting model developed pave the way to design PBFs having selected processability (e.g. viscosity after heat treatment) and properties of the product (e.g. particle size, colour, viscosity) for mimicking diverse dairy counterparts’ products (e.g., Greek style, Kefir, Skyr, etc.).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Engineering","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 112673"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260877425002080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demand for plant-based fermented products with similar nutritional, textural, and functional properties to dairy yoghurts is increasing. Generally, plant-based products are formulated using one single protein-based ingredient source. The combination of ingredients from different plant sources, such as oats, peas, and potatoes can overcome challenges related to nutritional value, physicochemical stability, and processability of plant-based foods. The study aims to determine the feasibility of combining pea and potato concentrates and oat flour for formulating plant-based dispersions to be used for fermentation regarding their processability and physicochemical properties. An experimental design was employed to create a variety of plant-based formulations (PBFs) at 3 % (w/w) protein. Oat-dominant PBFs had viscosity values ranging from 1141 to 871 mPa s, similar to high solid dairy counterparts (e.g., Greek-style yoghurts). In contrast, potato-dominant PBFs had significantly lower (P < 0.05) viscosity, similar to drinkable-like yoghurts or Kefir. The dominance of pea ingredients resulted in PBFs having intermediate viscosity, high net z-potential (−37 mV ± 4.04), and higher buffering capacity when compared to other PBFs. The insights of this study and the empirical predicting model developed pave the way to design PBFs having selected processability (e.g. viscosity after heat treatment) and properties of the product (e.g. particle size, colour, viscosity) for mimicking diverse dairy counterparts’ products (e.g., Greek style, Kefir, Skyr, etc.).
用燕麦、豌豆和马铃薯浓缩物配制的用于生产酸奶类似物的植物性分散体的加工性和理化性质
对以植物为基础的发酵产品的需求正在增加,这些产品具有与乳制品酸奶相似的营养、质地和功能特性。一般来说,植物性产品是用一种单一的蛋白质成分来源配制的。将不同植物来源的成分(如燕麦、豌豆和土豆)组合在一起,可以克服与植物性食品的营养价值、理化稳定性和可加工性有关的挑战。该研究旨在确定豌豆和马铃薯浓缩物与燕麦粉结合的可行性,以确定其可加工性和理化性质。采用实验设计,以3% (w/w)的蛋白质为基础,制备多种植物基配方(pbf)。以燕麦为主的pbf粘度值在1141到871 mPa s之间,类似于高固体乳制品(如希腊式酸奶)。相比之下,马铃薯优势PBFs显著降低(P <;0.05)粘度,类似于可饮用的酸奶或开菲尔。与其他PBFs相比,豌豆成分的优势导致PBFs具有中等粘度,高净z势(- 37 mV±4.04)和更高的缓冲能力。本研究的见解和开发的经验预测模型为设计pbf铺平了道路,pbf具有选择的加工性能(例如热处理后的粘度)和产品特性(例如粒度,颜色,粘度),以模仿不同的乳制品产品(例如希腊风格,Kefir, Skyr等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Engineering
Journal of Food Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research and review papers on any subject at the interface between food and engineering, particularly those of relevance to industry, including: Engineering properties of foods, food physics and physical chemistry; processing, measurement, control, packaging, storage and distribution; engineering aspects of the design and production of novel foods and of food service and catering; design and operation of food processes, plant and equipment; economics of food engineering, including the economics of alternative processes. Accounts of food engineering achievements are of particular value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信