Prediction of splitting tensile strength of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete utilizing machine learning models with SHAP analysis

Md Al Adnan , Muhammad Babur , Faisal Farooq , Mursaleen Shahid , Zamiul Ahmed , Pobithra Das
{"title":"Prediction of splitting tensile strength of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete utilizing machine learning models with SHAP analysis","authors":"Md Al Adnan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Babur ,&nbsp;Faisal Farooq ,&nbsp;Mursaleen Shahid ,&nbsp;Zamiul Ahmed ,&nbsp;Pobithra Das","doi":"10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The infrastructure industry utilizes a significant number of natural resources and produces a lot of construction waste, both of which have negative environmental effects. As a solution, recycled aggregate concrete has emerged as a practical substitute. Predicting strength accurately is essential for cutting design time and expenses while limiting material waste from numerous mixing tests. Machine learning methods tackle structural engineering issues, including the prediction of Splitting Tensile Strength (STS). In this study, used four novel machine learning models such as Random Forest Regression (RFR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosted Regression Trees (GBRT), and Bagging Regressor (BR) with grid search for hyperparameter tuning to forecast the splitting tensile strength of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (FRRAC). The machine learning models demonstrated high reliability in predicting splitting tensile strength, including robust values for R-squared (R<sup>2</sup>), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The prediction performance of the GBRT models showed the greatest R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.95 during the training stage and R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.83 during the testing phase. The XGBoost, RFR and BR models found R-square values were 0.822, 0.781 and 0.824 at the testing phase, respectively. Moreover, the RFR, BR, GBRT, and XGBoost model RMSE values were found to be 0.333, 0.298, 0.276, and 0.3004 at the testing phase, respectively, where the GBRT model RMSE value was found to be good. The GBRT model showed the lowest uncertainty value of both phases, with values of 0.619 and 0.597 for the training and testing phases, respectively. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis found that CR, and additional of Fiber were the most influential input features and replacement percentage of CR (%) and RCA Absorption capacity (%) inputs had the lowest impact of Fiber-Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete for predicting splitting tensile strength. These results indicate that the suggested technique can significantly contribute to sustainable construction practices by precisely predicting splitting tensile strength.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100614,"journal":{"name":"Hybrid Advances","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hybrid Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773207X25001319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The infrastructure industry utilizes a significant number of natural resources and produces a lot of construction waste, both of which have negative environmental effects. As a solution, recycled aggregate concrete has emerged as a practical substitute. Predicting strength accurately is essential for cutting design time and expenses while limiting material waste from numerous mixing tests. Machine learning methods tackle structural engineering issues, including the prediction of Splitting Tensile Strength (STS). In this study, used four novel machine learning models such as Random Forest Regression (RFR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosted Regression Trees (GBRT), and Bagging Regressor (BR) with grid search for hyperparameter tuning to forecast the splitting tensile strength of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (FRRAC). The machine learning models demonstrated high reliability in predicting splitting tensile strength, including robust values for R-squared (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The prediction performance of the GBRT models showed the greatest R2 value of 0.95 during the training stage and R2 value of 0.83 during the testing phase. The XGBoost, RFR and BR models found R-square values were 0.822, 0.781 and 0.824 at the testing phase, respectively. Moreover, the RFR, BR, GBRT, and XGBoost model RMSE values were found to be 0.333, 0.298, 0.276, and 0.3004 at the testing phase, respectively, where the GBRT model RMSE value was found to be good. The GBRT model showed the lowest uncertainty value of both phases, with values of 0.619 and 0.597 for the training and testing phases, respectively. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis found that CR, and additional of Fiber were the most influential input features and replacement percentage of CR (%) and RCA Absorption capacity (%) inputs had the lowest impact of Fiber-Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete for predicting splitting tensile strength. These results indicate that the suggested technique can significantly contribute to sustainable construction practices by precisely predicting splitting tensile strength.
利用机器学习模型和SHAP分析预测纤维增强再生骨料混凝土的劈裂抗拉强度
基础设施行业使用了大量的自然资源,产生了大量的建筑垃圾,这两者都对环境产生了负面影响。作为一种解决方案,再生骨料混凝土已经成为一种实用的替代品。准确预测强度对于减少设计时间和费用至关重要,同时限制大量混合试验造成的材料浪费。机器学习方法解决结构工程问题,包括劈裂拉伸强度(STS)的预测。在本研究中,使用随机森林回归(RFR)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、梯度增强回归树(GBRT)和Bagging回归器(BR)等四种新型机器学习模型,结合网格搜索进行超参数调整,预测纤维增强再生骨料混凝土(FRRAC)的劈裂抗拉强度。机器学习模型在预测劈裂拉伸强度方面表现出高可靠性,包括r平方(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)的稳健值。GBRT模型的预测性能在训练阶段的R2值为0.95,在测试阶段的R2值为0.83。XGBoost、RFR和BR模型在测试阶段的r平方值分别为0.822、0.781和0.824。此外,在测试阶段,RFR、BR、GBRT和XGBoost模型的RMSE值分别为0.333、0.298、0.276和0.3004,GBRT模型的RMSE值较好。GBRT模型在两个阶段的不确定性值最低,训练和测试阶段的不确定性值分别为0.619和0.597。此外,SHapley添加剂解释(SHAP)分析发现,CR和纤维的添加量是最具影响力的输入特征,CR替代百分比(%)和RCA吸收容量(%)输入对纤维增强再生骨料混凝土预测劈裂抗拉强度的影响最小。这些结果表明,所建议的技术可以通过精确预测劈裂抗拉强度来显著促进可持续建筑实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信