{"title":"EFFICACY OF HYALURONIC NANOGEL SPRAY FOR TREATING DRY MOUTH: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY","authors":"NONGNAPAT EAKPUNYAKUL , PEERAWAS KOPONGPANICH , KANOKPORN BHALANG , JITTIMA AMIE LUCKANAGUL","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of Hy-N spray in dry mouth patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted on patients with dry mouth. They were given 3 saliva substitute sprays: Hy-N, placebo, and Biotène. The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), salivary pH, and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 week of treatment with each spray. Patient satisfaction was evaluated after each treatment period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-nine patients completed the study. After using the Hy-N and Biotène sprays for 1 week, the UWSFR significantly increased from 0.12 ± 0.16 at baseline to 0.16 ± 0.18 mL/min postspray usage (<em>P</em> = .04, <em>P</em> ≤ .01) with moderate improvement. None of the sprays affected salivary pH (<em>P</em> = .72). The mean XQ score also significantly decreased from 34.2 ± 21.4 at baseline to 23.7 ± 17.4, 23.1 ± 15.2, and 26.5 ± 17.7 after using Hy-N, Biotène, and placebo spray, respectively (<em>P</em> = .001, <em>P</em> = .011, <em>P</em> = .009) with moderate improvement. Biotène was the most preferred saliva substitute spray, followed by Hy-N spray.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using the Hy-N and Biotène for 1 week relieves subjective and objective dry mouth. They can be a useful product in the management of dry mouth without causing side-effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"25 3","pages":"Article 102142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy of Hy-N spray in dry mouth patients.
Materials and Methods
A randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted on patients with dry mouth. They were given 3 saliva substitute sprays: Hy-N, placebo, and Biotène. The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), salivary pH, and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 week of treatment with each spray. Patient satisfaction was evaluated after each treatment period.
Results
Twenty-nine patients completed the study. After using the Hy-N and Biotène sprays for 1 week, the UWSFR significantly increased from 0.12 ± 0.16 at baseline to 0.16 ± 0.18 mL/min postspray usage (P = .04, P ≤ .01) with moderate improvement. None of the sprays affected salivary pH (P = .72). The mean XQ score also significantly decreased from 34.2 ± 21.4 at baseline to 23.7 ± 17.4, 23.1 ± 15.2, and 26.5 ± 17.7 after using Hy-N, Biotène, and placebo spray, respectively (P = .001, P = .011, P = .009) with moderate improvement. Biotène was the most preferred saliva substitute spray, followed by Hy-N spray.
Conclusion
Using the Hy-N and Biotène for 1 week relieves subjective and objective dry mouth. They can be a useful product in the management of dry mouth without causing side-effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.