Suspicious minds: Psychological techniques correlated with online phishing attacks

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ioannis Stylianou , Panagiotis Bountakas , Apostolis Zarras , Christos Xenakis
{"title":"Suspicious minds: Psychological techniques correlated with online phishing attacks","authors":"Ioannis Stylianou ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Bountakas ,&nbsp;Apostolis Zarras ,&nbsp;Christos Xenakis","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phishing remains a pervasive threat to information security, leveraging human psychology to manipulate individuals into disclosing sensitive information or performing actions against their best interests. This study presents a comprehensive taxonomy and analysis of psychological techniques utilized in social engineering, introducing novel metrics such as Absolute Compliance Increase Rate (ACR), Relative Compliance Increase Rate (RCR), and Comprehensive Compliance Increase Rate (CCR) to quantify their effectiveness. Our methodology involved a systematic review of existing literature and empirical data from psychological experiments to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various techniques, including Authority, Commitment &amp; Consistency, Reciprocity, and Group Pressure. The findings indicate that the Majority Size technique, measured by CCR, is particularly potent in scenarios with low initial compliance rates, while Authority, Commitment &amp; Consistency, and Reciprocity also demonstrate high effectiveness. These insights enhance the understanding of the mechanics of social engineering techniques, enabling the development of more effective countermeasures against social engineering attacks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100694"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phishing remains a pervasive threat to information security, leveraging human psychology to manipulate individuals into disclosing sensitive information or performing actions against their best interests. This study presents a comprehensive taxonomy and analysis of psychological techniques utilized in social engineering, introducing novel metrics such as Absolute Compliance Increase Rate (ACR), Relative Compliance Increase Rate (RCR), and Comprehensive Compliance Increase Rate (CCR) to quantify their effectiveness. Our methodology involved a systematic review of existing literature and empirical data from psychological experiments to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various techniques, including Authority, Commitment & Consistency, Reciprocity, and Group Pressure. The findings indicate that the Majority Size technique, measured by CCR, is particularly potent in scenarios with low initial compliance rates, while Authority, Commitment & Consistency, and Reciprocity also demonstrate high effectiveness. These insights enhance the understanding of the mechanics of social engineering techniques, enabling the development of more effective countermeasures against social engineering attacks.
多疑心理:与网络钓鱼攻击相关的心理技巧
网络钓鱼仍然是对信息安全的普遍威胁,利用人类的心理来操纵个人泄露敏感信息或执行违背其最佳利益的行为。本研究对社会工程中使用的心理学技术进行了全面的分类和分析,引入了诸如绝对依从性增加率(ACR)、相对依从性增加率(RCR)和综合依从性增加率(CCR)等新指标来量化其有效性。我们的方法包括系统地回顾现有文献和心理学实验的经验数据,以评估和比较各种技术的有效性,包括权威,承诺和;一致性、互惠性和群体压力。研究结果表明,以CCR衡量的多数规模技术在初始合规率较低的情况下特别有效,而权威、承诺和;一致性和互惠性也表现出高效率。这些见解增强了对社会工程技术机制的理解,从而能够开发更有效的对策来对抗社会工程攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信