Nationwide serological survey and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infections in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) and llamas (Lama glama) in Italy
{"title":"Nationwide serological survey and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infections in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) and llamas (Lama glama) in Italy","authors":"Elisa Castaldo , Walter Basso , Gastón Moré , Alessia Ciaramelli , Nicola D'Alessio , Michele Capasso , Giovanni Sgroi , Sara Tonon , Farwa Humak , Alessia Gazzonis , Gereon Schares , Vincenzo Veneziano","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Toxoplasma gondii</em> and <em>Neospora caninum</em> are worldwide distributed protozoa, recognized as major causes of economic losses in livestock production due to reproductive failure. Camelids can also serve as intermediate hosts for these protozoa. Research on these parasites in South American Camelids (SAC) in Europe is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence and distribution of <em>T. gondii</em> and <em>N. caninum</em> infections in SAC in Italy and investigate risk factors for infection applying a structured online questionnaire filled in by owners. A total of 506 SAC sera (486 alpacas, <em>Vicugna pacos,</em> and 20 llamas, <em>Lama glama</em>) were tested to detect antibodies against <em>T. gondii</em> and <em>N. caninum</em> using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and results were confirmed with immunoblot. Seroprevalences of 34.8 % (176/506) for <em>T. gondii,</em> with 33.1 % (161/486) for alpacas and 75.0 % (15/20) for llamas, and 5.7 % (29/506) for <em>N. caninum,</em> with 5.6 % (27/486) for alpacas and 10.0 % (2/20) for llamas were found. Simultaneous presence of antibodies against <em>T. gondii</em> and <em>N. caninum</em> was detected in 3.6 % (18/506) of the samples. The variables older age and llama species were identified as risk factors (<em>p</em> < 0.05) for <em>T. gondii</em>, while the presence of dogs and fertility disorders were associated with <em>N. caninum</em> seropositivity. This study provides the first large-scale serological evidence of <em>T. gondii</em> and <em>N. caninum</em> infections in alpacas and llamas in Italy, highlighting their widespread distribution and contributing valuable data to the national epidemiological scenario. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of these parasites as cause of abortion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 105729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825002036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are worldwide distributed protozoa, recognized as major causes of economic losses in livestock production due to reproductive failure. Camelids can also serve as intermediate hosts for these protozoa. Research on these parasites in South American Camelids (SAC) in Europe is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence and distribution of T. gondii and N. caninum infections in SAC in Italy and investigate risk factors for infection applying a structured online questionnaire filled in by owners. A total of 506 SAC sera (486 alpacas, Vicugna pacos, and 20 llamas, Lama glama) were tested to detect antibodies against T. gondii and N. caninum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and results were confirmed with immunoblot. Seroprevalences of 34.8 % (176/506) for T. gondii, with 33.1 % (161/486) for alpacas and 75.0 % (15/20) for llamas, and 5.7 % (29/506) for N. caninum, with 5.6 % (27/486) for alpacas and 10.0 % (2/20) for llamas were found. Simultaneous presence of antibodies against T. gondii and N. caninum was detected in 3.6 % (18/506) of the samples. The variables older age and llama species were identified as risk factors (p < 0.05) for T. gondii, while the presence of dogs and fertility disorders were associated with N. caninum seropositivity. This study provides the first large-scale serological evidence of T. gondii and N. caninum infections in alpacas and llamas in Italy, highlighting their widespread distribution and contributing valuable data to the national epidemiological scenario. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of these parasites as cause of abortion.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.