{"title":"The unseen teen: Social platforms and accountability for addressing adolescent well‐being","authors":"Kellie Owens, Amanda Lenhart","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescent mental health issues are of growing concern, with many pointing to social media platforms as exacerbating the problem. Based on interviews with 25 social media and social gaming platform employees, this study interrogates product design processes within companies to understand if and how adolescent well‐being is considered when building online platforms. Our findings suggest that companies do not generally consider adolescent well‐being in their product design, and when they do, may choose not to enact needed changes. Instead, our analysis suggests that companies design for an imagined average user, ignoring subgroups with needs that, if addressed, would bring benefits for everyone. They may also employ strategic ignorance by not collecting data on adolescents’ use of their platforms or by creating structures that absolve staff from responsibility for youth mental health. Public health practitioners can reduce burdens on adolescents and families for managing their use of online platforms by holding platform companies accountable for design choices that lead to diminished adolescent well‐being. To do this, public health practitioners could collect granular, updated data on adolescents’ use of social media, create detailed pictures of how different types of adolescents use different products, develop structural measures of well‐being for adolescents online, and recommend product changes.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adolescent mental health issues are of growing concern, with many pointing to social media platforms as exacerbating the problem. Based on interviews with 25 social media and social gaming platform employees, this study interrogates product design processes within companies to understand if and how adolescent well‐being is considered when building online platforms. Our findings suggest that companies do not generally consider adolescent well‐being in their product design, and when they do, may choose not to enact needed changes. Instead, our analysis suggests that companies design for an imagined average user, ignoring subgroups with needs that, if addressed, would bring benefits for everyone. They may also employ strategic ignorance by not collecting data on adolescents’ use of their platforms or by creating structures that absolve staff from responsibility for youth mental health. Public health practitioners can reduce burdens on adolescents and families for managing their use of online platforms by holding platform companies accountable for design choices that lead to diminished adolescent well‐being. To do this, public health practitioners could collect granular, updated data on adolescents’ use of social media, create detailed pictures of how different types of adolescents use different products, develop structural measures of well‐being for adolescents online, and recommend product changes.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.