Ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying in foraging behaviour.

IF 4.1 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Noham Wolpe, Daniel N Scott, Mordechai L Salomon, Matthew R Nassar, Paul C Fletcher, Emilio Fernandez-Egea
{"title":"Ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying in foraging behaviour.","authors":"Noham Wolpe, Daniel N Scott, Mordechai L Salomon, Matthew R Nassar, Paul C Fletcher, Emilio Fernandez-Egea","doi":"10.1038/s41514-025-00240-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People constantly decide how much time to invest in rewarding activities. Foraging tasks assess this decision-making by measuring when individuals switch between contexts. People typically perform suboptimally in these tasks, largely due to overstaying, but it remains unclear whether this tendency changes with age independently of cognitive abilities and mental health factors. Previous research showing increased sensitivity to the opportunity cost of time in older adults predicts less overstaying, whereas a hypothesised shift towards exploitative behaviour predicts more overstaying. In an online foraging task, 350 young and older adults decided when to switch between contexts with varying reward conditions. We also assessed cognitive performance and self-reported motivation and depression. Participants consistently overstayed, and this behaviour was strongly associated with sensitivity to reward changes. Despite this, older adults selectively overstayed more without increased reward-based adaptation. Our findings show ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying, supporting increased exploitative behaviour in old age.</p>","PeriodicalId":94160,"journal":{"name":"npj aging","volume":"11 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-025-00240-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People constantly decide how much time to invest in rewarding activities. Foraging tasks assess this decision-making by measuring when individuals switch between contexts. People typically perform suboptimally in these tasks, largely due to overstaying, but it remains unclear whether this tendency changes with age independently of cognitive abilities and mental health factors. Previous research showing increased sensitivity to the opportunity cost of time in older adults predicts less overstaying, whereas a hypothesised shift towards exploitative behaviour predicts more overstaying. In an online foraging task, 350 young and older adults decided when to switch between contexts with varying reward conditions. We also assessed cognitive performance and self-reported motivation and depression. Participants consistently overstayed, and this behaviour was strongly associated with sensitivity to reward changes. Despite this, older adults selectively overstayed more without increased reward-based adaptation. Our findings show ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying, supporting increased exploitative behaviour in old age.

衰老与觅食行为中过度停留有关。
人们经常决定在奖励活动上投入多少时间。觅食任务通过测量个体在不同环境之间切换的时间来评估这种决策。人们通常在这些任务中表现不佳,主要是由于过度逗留,但目前尚不清楚这种趋势是否会随着年龄的增长而变化,而不受认知能力和心理健康因素的影响。先前的研究表明,老年人对时间机会成本的敏感度增加,预示着逾期居留的减少,而向剥削行为的转变则预示着逾期居留的增加。在一项在线觅食任务中,350名年轻人和老年人决定何时在不同奖励条件下切换。我们还评估了认知表现和自我报告的动机和抑郁。参与者总是逾期逗留,这种行为与对奖励变化的敏感性密切相关。尽管如此,老年人仍然有选择性地逾期居留,没有增加基于奖励的适应。我们的研究结果表明,衰老与过度逾期居留有关,这支持了老年人剥削行为的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信