Long-term safety and efficacy of self-apposing Stentys drug-eluting stent in left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention: final results of multicentre LM-STENTYS registry.

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.5603/cj.101925
Maksymilian J Mielczarek, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Wańha, Dariusz Ciećwierz, Grzegorz Smolka, Marta Marcinkowska, Michał Chmielecki, Brunon Tomasiewicz, Piotr Kubler, Michał Kasprzak, Marta Chamera, Jarosław Gorol, Stanisław Bartuś, Jacek Kubica, Krzysztof Reczuch, Michał Hawranek, Andrzej Ochała, Wojciech Wojakowski, Marcin Gruchała, Miłosz Jaguszewski
{"title":"Long-term safety and efficacy of self-apposing Stentys drug-eluting stent in left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention: final results of multicentre LM-STENTYS registry.","authors":"Maksymilian J Mielczarek, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Wańha, Dariusz Ciećwierz, Grzegorz Smolka, Marta Marcinkowska, Michał Chmielecki, Brunon Tomasiewicz, Piotr Kubler, Michał Kasprzak, Marta Chamera, Jarosław Gorol, Stanisław Bartuś, Jacek Kubica, Krzysztof Reczuch, Michał Hawranek, Andrzej Ochała, Wojciech Wojakowski, Marcin Gruchała, Miłosz Jaguszewski","doi":"10.5603/cj.101925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stentys drug-eluting stent (Stentys DES) was proposed to possess potential benefits over balloon-expandable platforms in large bifurcations, mainly distal left main stem (LMS). Several registries demonstrated favourable one-year clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using Stentys DES for LMS disease. However, long-term follow- up data have been lacking hitherto.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 175 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with Stentys DES for unprotected LMS and categorized them into acute- and chronic coronary syndrome (ACS/CCS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stroke assessed at five years. The secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis (ST), restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical follow-up at five years was completed for 124 out of 175 patients (70.9%), encompassing 85 with ACS and 39 with CCS. At five years, MACCE occurred in 55 out of 124 patients (44.4%). Although, there was a higher rate of MACCE (53% vs 28.2%, p = 0.018), MI (27.1% vs 2.6%, p = 0.016) and TLR (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.036) in ACS vs. CCS patients, the rates of cardiac deaths were similar (27.1% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.77, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Herein, favourable long-term outcome of LMS PCI with Stentys DES in the CCS setting are shown. In the ACS setting, worse one-year outcome persisted at five years and was partially related to high rate of acute/subacute ST that might be optimized by immediate loading with potent antiplatelet drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.101925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stentys drug-eluting stent (Stentys DES) was proposed to possess potential benefits over balloon-expandable platforms in large bifurcations, mainly distal left main stem (LMS). Several registries demonstrated favourable one-year clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using Stentys DES for LMS disease. However, long-term follow- up data have been lacking hitherto.

Methods: The study enrolled 175 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with Stentys DES for unprotected LMS and categorized them into acute- and chronic coronary syndrome (ACS/CCS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stroke assessed at five years. The secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis (ST), restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR).

Results: Clinical follow-up at five years was completed for 124 out of 175 patients (70.9%), encompassing 85 with ACS and 39 with CCS. At five years, MACCE occurred in 55 out of 124 patients (44.4%). Although, there was a higher rate of MACCE (53% vs 28.2%, p = 0.018), MI (27.1% vs 2.6%, p = 0.016) and TLR (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.036) in ACS vs. CCS patients, the rates of cardiac deaths were similar (27.1% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.77, respectively).

Conclusions: Herein, favourable long-term outcome of LMS PCI with Stentys DES in the CCS setting are shown. In the ACS setting, worse one-year outcome persisted at five years and was partially related to high rate of acute/subacute ST that might be optimized by immediate loading with potent antiplatelet drugs.

自贴Stentys药物洗脱支架在左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的长期安全性和有效性:多中心LM-STENTYS注册的最终结果
背景:Stentys药物洗脱支架(Stentys DES)被认为在大分叉,主要是左主干(LMS)远端具有比球囊可膨胀平台更大的潜在优势。几个注册显示使用Stentys DES治疗LMS疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)一年的临床效果良好。然而,长期的随访资料一直缺乏。方法:该研究招募了175例连续使用Stentys DES接受PCI治疗无保护LMS的患者,并将其分为急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征(ACS/CCS)。主要终点是主要心脏和大脑不良事件(MACCE),包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、靶病变血运重建术(TLR)和5年卒中评估。次要终点为支架内血栓形成(ST)、再狭窄和靶血管重建术(TVR)。结果:175例患者中有124例(70.9%)完成了5年的临床随访,其中85例为ACS, 39例为CCS。5年时,124例患者中有55例(44.4%)发生MACCE。虽然ACS与CCS患者的MACCE (53% vs 28.2%, p = 0.018)、MI (27.1% vs 2.6%, p = 0.016)和TLR (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.036)发生率较高,但心源性死亡率相似(27.1% vs 25.6%, p = 0.77)。结论:在此,LMS PCI与Stentys DES在CCS环境下的长期预后良好。在ACS患者中,较差的1年预后持续到5年,这部分与急性/亚急性ST发生率高有关,这可能通过立即加载强效抗血小板药物来优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信