Pontic Site Development Following Tooth Extraction: A Clinical Study.

IF 1.1
Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmino, Kim Martin, Engin Ozgur, Manrique Fonseca, Clemens Raabe, Vivianne Chappuis, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz
{"title":"Pontic Site Development Following Tooth Extraction: A Clinical Study.","authors":"Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmino, Kim Martin, Engin Ozgur, Manrique Fonseca, Clemens Raabe, Vivianne Chappuis, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz","doi":"10.11607/prd.7672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) for pontic site development following non-molar maxillary tooth extraction versus unassisted socket healing (USH). Cone beam computed tomography was employed to measure pre-extraction facial bone thickness (FBT). An ideal baseline pontic was digitally pre-designed according to the characteristics of the site before tooth extraction, which was captured with a surface scanner. Post-extraction pontic modifications were analyzed by superimposing baseline and final scans. Additionally, changes in alveolar ridge width, the presence of a buccal soft tissue concavity, and the need for soft tissue augmentation were also assessed. Among 88 patients, USH sites required significantly more pontic modifications and exhibited greater horizontal ridge reduction compared to sites that underwent ARP (P<.001). ARP sites exhibited a lower prevalence of buccal ridge concavity compared to USH (70.5% vs 88.6%, P=.06) and a lower need for soft tissue augmentation (46.5% vs. 70.5%, P=.06). FBT at baseline was strongly negatively associated with more pontic modifications, greater horizontal ridge reduction, and increased need for soft tissue augmentation regardless of the baseline therapy (P<.001), but not with the presence of a buccal soft tissue concavity (P=.06). These findings suggest that ARP therapy effectively mitigates post-extraction dimensional changes, making it a viable approach for pontic site development. However, ancillary soft tissue augmentation may be required in certain cases to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) for pontic site development following non-molar maxillary tooth extraction versus unassisted socket healing (USH). Cone beam computed tomography was employed to measure pre-extraction facial bone thickness (FBT). An ideal baseline pontic was digitally pre-designed according to the characteristics of the site before tooth extraction, which was captured with a surface scanner. Post-extraction pontic modifications were analyzed by superimposing baseline and final scans. Additionally, changes in alveolar ridge width, the presence of a buccal soft tissue concavity, and the need for soft tissue augmentation were also assessed. Among 88 patients, USH sites required significantly more pontic modifications and exhibited greater horizontal ridge reduction compared to sites that underwent ARP (P<.001). ARP sites exhibited a lower prevalence of buccal ridge concavity compared to USH (70.5% vs 88.6%, P=.06) and a lower need for soft tissue augmentation (46.5% vs. 70.5%, P=.06). FBT at baseline was strongly negatively associated with more pontic modifications, greater horizontal ridge reduction, and increased need for soft tissue augmentation regardless of the baseline therapy (P<.001), but not with the presence of a buccal soft tissue concavity (P=.06). These findings suggest that ARP therapy effectively mitigates post-extraction dimensional changes, making it a viable approach for pontic site development. However, ancillary soft tissue augmentation may be required in certain cases to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes.

拔牙后桥位发育的临床研究。
本研究评估了非磨牙上颌拔牙后牙槽嵴保存(ARP)与非辅助牙槽愈合(USH)对桥位发育的影响。锥形束计算机断层扫描测量提取前面部骨厚度。根据拔牙前部位的特征,用数字技术预先设计一个理想的基线桥,并用表面扫描仪捕获。通过叠加基线扫描和最终扫描来分析提取后桥的变化。此外,还评估了牙槽嵴宽度的变化,口腔软组织凹陷的存在以及软组织增强的需要。在88例患者中,与接受ARP (P)的部位相比,USH部位需要更多的桥突修复,并表现出更大的水平脊缩小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信