Telemedicine in critical care: collaborative experience in postoperative pediatric cardiac care.

María Althabe, Paula Martínez-Da Bove, Celeste Arancibia, Mercedes Montonati, Sandra Chuchuy, Doris Flores, Noelia De Maio, Mariana Fenoy, Edgardo Rodríguez, Laura Selvatici
{"title":"Telemedicine in critical care: collaborative experience in postoperative pediatric cardiac care.","authors":"María Althabe, Paula Martínez-Da Bove, Celeste Arancibia, Mercedes Montonati, Sandra Chuchuy, Doris Flores, Noelia De Maio, Mariana Fenoy, Edgardo Rodríguez, Laura Selvatici","doi":"10.24875/ACM.24000070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Telehealth applied to the perioperative care of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease facilitates sharing experiences and provides valuable support to institutions initiating cardiac surgery programs, improving the quality of patient care. The primary goal of this study is to describe the implementation and initial results of a collaborative telehealth program between two cardiac centers with different complexity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Three teleconsultations per patient were programed, one preoperative to identify risks and discuss postoperative strategies, the second immediate after admission, and the last on day 2 pop. Demographic data, diagnosis, and surgical procedures (RACHS-1 scale) were recorded. A satisfaction survey was completed at the end of the process for each patient. A descriptive analysis was performed (Stata<sup>®</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-three patients were consulted in 154 connections, with an average of 25 min consultation. Diagnoses included ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, and aortic coartation. The proportion of patients undergoing more complex procedures (RACHS-1 ≥ 3) increased from 9.5 to 35%. Survey results indicated that teleconsultation significantly contributed to problem-solving and understanding (100%), suggested new studies (18.6%), or new diagnoses (16.3%), modifications in therapeutic proposals (37.2%), and follow-up protocols (49%). Connectivity issues (41.8%) and challenges in coordinating consultation schedules (42%) were identified as the main difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Throughout the program, the complexity of RACHS-1 ≥ 3 procedures increased from 9.5 to 35%. Teleconsultation demonstrated notable enhancements in understanding and problem-solving capabilities, despite challenges in connectivity and scheduling coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":"95 2","pages":"138-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.24000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Telehealth applied to the perioperative care of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease facilitates sharing experiences and provides valuable support to institutions initiating cardiac surgery programs, improving the quality of patient care. The primary goal of this study is to describe the implementation and initial results of a collaborative telehealth program between two cardiac centers with different complexity.

Method: Three teleconsultations per patient were programed, one preoperative to identify risks and discuss postoperative strategies, the second immediate after admission, and the last on day 2 pop. Demographic data, diagnosis, and surgical procedures (RACHS-1 scale) were recorded. A satisfaction survey was completed at the end of the process for each patient. A descriptive analysis was performed (Stata®).

Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients were consulted in 154 connections, with an average of 25 min consultation. Diagnoses included ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, and aortic coartation. The proportion of patients undergoing more complex procedures (RACHS-1 ≥ 3) increased from 9.5 to 35%. Survey results indicated that teleconsultation significantly contributed to problem-solving and understanding (100%), suggested new studies (18.6%), or new diagnoses (16.3%), modifications in therapeutic proposals (37.2%), and follow-up protocols (49%). Connectivity issues (41.8%) and challenges in coordinating consultation schedules (42%) were identified as the main difficulties.

Conclusions: Throughout the program, the complexity of RACHS-1 ≥ 3 procedures increased from 9.5 to 35%. Teleconsultation demonstrated notable enhancements in understanding and problem-solving capabilities, despite challenges in connectivity and scheduling coordination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

危重病护理中的远程医疗:小儿心脏术后护理的协作经验。
目的:远程医疗应用于先天性心脏病患儿围手术期护理,促进经验分享,为开展心脏手术项目的机构提供有价值的支持,提高患者护理质量。本研究的主要目的是描述两个不同复杂程度的心脏中心之间的协作远程医疗计划的实施和初步结果。方法:每位患者进行三次远程会诊,一次术前确定风险并讨论术后策略,第二次在入院后立即进行,最后一次在第2天进行。记录人口统计数据、诊断和手术过程(RACHS-1量表)。在治疗结束时,对每位患者进行满意度调查。进行描述性分析(Stata®)。结果:154次连接共咨询了123例患者,平均咨询时间为25分钟。诊断包括室间隔缺损、房间隔缺损和主动脉缩窄。接受更复杂手术(RACHS-1≥3)的患者比例从9.5%增加到35%。调查结果显示,远程咨询显著有助于解决问题和理解(100%),建议新的研究(18.6%)或新的诊断(16.3%),修改治疗建议(37.2%)和随访方案(49%)。连接问题(41.8%)和协调咨询时间表的挑战(42%)被认为是主要的困难。结论:在整个方案中,RACHS-1≥3的程序的复杂性从9.5%增加到35%。尽管在连接和调度协调方面存在挑战,但远程咨询在理解和解决问题能力方面表现出显著的增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信