Moderation of treatment outcomes by polygenic risk for alcohol-related traits in placebo-controlled trials of topiramate

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Henry R. Kranzler, Zeal Jinwala, Christal N. Davis, Heng Xu, Joanna M. Biernacka, Hang Zhou, Rachel L. Kember, Joel Gelernter, Richard Feinn
{"title":"Moderation of treatment outcomes by polygenic risk for alcohol-related traits in placebo-controlled trials of topiramate","authors":"Henry R. Kranzler,&nbsp;Zeal Jinwala,&nbsp;Christal N. Davis,&nbsp;Heng Xu,&nbsp;Joanna M. Biernacka,&nbsp;Hang Zhou,&nbsp;Rachel L. Kember,&nbsp;Joel Gelernter,&nbsp;Richard Feinn","doi":"10.1111/acer.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), topiramate significantly reduced heavy drinking days (HDDs), and alcohol-related problems. In a secondary analysis of those findings, we examined four broad measures of genetic risk—polygenic scores (PGS)—of problematic alcohol use (PAU), drinks per week (DPW), and time to relapse to any drinking (TR) and heavy drinking (THR) as moderators of topiramate's effect on HDDs and alcohol-related problems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from 285 individuals with AUD (65.6% male) of European-like ancestry, who were treated with either topiramate (49.1%) or placebo (50.9%). All patients underwent genome-wide array genotyping, and PGS were calculated using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of PAU, DPW, and TR and THR (two time-to-event outcomes among patients treated in AUD pharmacotherapy trials). We hypothesized an interaction effect in which greater genetic risk—particularly for PAU—would be associated with a greater therapeutic response to topiramate than placebo.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>As shown previously, topiramate significantly reduced both HDDs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and Short Index of Problems (SIP) scores (<i>b</i> = −3.04, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) more than placebo. There were nonsignificant associations of higher PGS with more HDDs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98–1.41, <i>p</i> = 0.091) and a greater reduction in HDDs in the topiramate group (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62–1.03, <i>p</i> = 0.089). There were also significant interaction effects with treatment on SIP score by PGS for PAU (<i>b</i> = −1.64, SE = 0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.033), TR (<i>b</i> = −2.16, SE = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and TRH (<i>b</i> = −2.17, SE = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings provide proof of principle for the use of alcohol-related PGS as moderators of the effects of topiramate for treating AUD. Larger RCTs of topiramate are needed to provide adequate statistical power to validate this pharmacogenetic approach to precision AUD treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 6","pages":"1297-1305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), topiramate significantly reduced heavy drinking days (HDDs), and alcohol-related problems. In a secondary analysis of those findings, we examined four broad measures of genetic risk—polygenic scores (PGS)—of problematic alcohol use (PAU), drinks per week (DPW), and time to relapse to any drinking (TR) and heavy drinking (THR) as moderators of topiramate's effect on HDDs and alcohol-related problems.

Methods

We analyzed data from 285 individuals with AUD (65.6% male) of European-like ancestry, who were treated with either topiramate (49.1%) or placebo (50.9%). All patients underwent genome-wide array genotyping, and PGS were calculated using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of PAU, DPW, and TR and THR (two time-to-event outcomes among patients treated in AUD pharmacotherapy trials). We hypothesized an interaction effect in which greater genetic risk—particularly for PAU—would be associated with a greater therapeutic response to topiramate than placebo.

Results

As shown previously, topiramate significantly reduced both HDDs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, p < 0.001) and Short Index of Problems (SIP) scores (b = −3.04, p < 0.001) more than placebo. There were nonsignificant associations of higher PGS with more HDDs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98–1.41, p = 0.091) and a greater reduction in HDDs in the topiramate group (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62–1.03, p = 0.089). There were also significant interaction effects with treatment on SIP score by PGS for PAU (b = −1.64, SE = 0.78, p = 0.033), TR (b = −2.16, SE = 0.72, p = 0.003), and TRH (b = −2.17, SE = 0.72, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

These findings provide proof of principle for the use of alcohol-related PGS as moderators of the effects of topiramate for treating AUD. Larger RCTs of topiramate are needed to provide adequate statistical power to validate this pharmacogenetic approach to precision AUD treatment.

托吡酯安慰剂对照试验中酒精相关性状的多基因风险对治疗结果的调节作用
背景:在两项针对酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者的为期12周的随机安慰剂对照试验(rct)中,托吡酯显著减少了重度饮酒天数(hdd)和酒精相关问题。在对这些发现的二次分析中,我们检查了四种广泛的遗传风险-多基因评分(PGS)-问题性酒精使用(PAU),每周饮酒量(DPW),任何饮酒(TR)和重度饮酒(THR)的复发时间作为托吡酯对hdd和酒精相关问题影响的调节因子。方法:我们分析了285名欧洲血统的AUD患者(65.6%为男性)的数据,这些患者接受托吡酯(49.1%)或安慰剂(50.9%)治疗。所有患者都进行了全基因组阵列基因分型,并使用PAU、DPW、TR和THR(在AUD药物治疗试验中接受治疗的患者的两个事件发生时间结局)全基因组关联研究的汇总统计来计算PGS。我们假设了一种相互作用效应,其中更大的遗传风险-特别是对于paa -将与托吡酯比安慰剂更大的治疗反应相关。结果:如前所述,托吡酯显著降低了两种hdd(优势比[OR] = 0.50, p)。结论:这些发现为使用酒精相关的PGS作为托吡酯治疗AUD效果的调节因子提供了原理证明。需要更大的托吡酯随机对照试验来提供足够的统计力量来验证这种精确治疗AUD的药物遗传学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信