Match Demands and Perceived Exertion of Cerebral Palsy Soccer National Team Players.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Daniel Wartner, Rick Cost, J C Andersen, José M Oliva-Lozano
{"title":"Match Demands and Perceived Exertion of Cerebral Palsy Soccer National Team Players.","authors":"Daniel Wartner, Rick Cost, J C Andersen, José M Oliva-Lozano","doi":"10.1177/19417381251338801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this study were to analyze match demands and perceptual responses of cerebral palsy soccer national team players. Specifically, to identify whether variations in match demands exist between playing positions and between halves.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Differences between playing positions exist and match demands differ from first to second half.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, longitudinal study was conducted over the 2022-2023 season. Electronic performance and tracking systems collected physical output, whereas perceptual responses were collected through ratings of perceived exertion postmatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Playing position significantly affected all variables (<i>F</i><sub>(4,66)</sub> = 4.05-73.31; <i>P</i> < .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.20-0.82). Midfielders had the greatest average physical output in all variables, except for high-intensity accelerations per minute (forwards = ~0.19 count/min) and maximum velocity (full-backs = ~28.87 km/h). Match half had no significant effect on any variable (<i>F</i><sub>(4,66)</sub> = 0.00-1.38; <i>P</i> > .05; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.00-0.02), except for distance per minute, which was usually greater in the first half than second half (<i>F</i><sub>(1,66)</sub> = 7.15; <i>P</i> = .01; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.10). Regarding perceptual response, playing position had a significant effect, with goalkeepers having significantly lower ratings of perceived exertion compared with the other positions (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Playing position significantly affected all variables, with goalkeepers showing the lowest demands, followed by central defenders. Midfielders had the highest physical output across most variables, except for high-intensity accelerations per minute (forwards) and maximum velocity (full-backs). Match half had no significant effect on any variable, except for distance per minute.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Understanding match demands and positional differences in cerebral palsy soccer helps coaches plan tailored training sessions and drills to meet specific physical outputs. This knowledge supports training periodization, optimal player performance, and recovery. Insights into physical challenges for each position assist in scouting and adjusting training intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251338801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251338801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to analyze match demands and perceptual responses of cerebral palsy soccer national team players. Specifically, to identify whether variations in match demands exist between playing positions and between halves.

Hypothesis: Differences between playing positions exist and match demands differ from first to second half.

Study design: Cohort study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: An observational, longitudinal study was conducted over the 2022-2023 season. Electronic performance and tracking systems collected physical output, whereas perceptual responses were collected through ratings of perceived exertion postmatch.

Results: Playing position significantly affected all variables (F(4,66) = 4.05-73.31; P < .001; ηp2 = 0.20-0.82). Midfielders had the greatest average physical output in all variables, except for high-intensity accelerations per minute (forwards = ~0.19 count/min) and maximum velocity (full-backs = ~28.87 km/h). Match half had no significant effect on any variable (F(4,66) = 0.00-1.38; P > .05; ηp2 = 0.00-0.02), except for distance per minute, which was usually greater in the first half than second half (F(1,66) = 7.15; P = .01; ηp2 = 0.10). Regarding perceptual response, playing position had a significant effect, with goalkeepers having significantly lower ratings of perceived exertion compared with the other positions (P < .05).

Conclusion: Playing position significantly affected all variables, with goalkeepers showing the lowest demands, followed by central defenders. Midfielders had the highest physical output across most variables, except for high-intensity accelerations per minute (forwards) and maximum velocity (full-backs). Match half had no significant effect on any variable, except for distance per minute.

Clinical relevance: Understanding match demands and positional differences in cerebral palsy soccer helps coaches plan tailored training sessions and drills to meet specific physical outputs. This knowledge supports training periodization, optimal player performance, and recovery. Insights into physical challenges for each position assist in scouting and adjusting training intensity.

脑性麻痹足球国家队队员的比赛需求与体能感知。
背景:本研究的目的是分析脑瘫足球国家队球员的比赛需求和知觉反应。具体来说,要确定比赛需求的变化是否存在于不同的位置和半场之间。假设:比赛位置存在差异,上半场和下半场比赛需求不同。研究设计:队列研究。证据等级:三级。方法:在2022-2023年季节进行了一项观察性纵向研究。电子表现和跟踪系统收集身体输出,而感知反应通过赛后感知运动的评级收集。结果:打球位置对各变量均有显著影响(F(4,66) = 4.05-73.31;P < .001;ηp2 = 0.20-0.82)。除了高强度的每分钟加速度(前锋= ~0.19次/分钟)和最大速度(边后卫= ~28.87公里/小时)外,中场球员的平均身体输出在所有变量中都是最大的。配对一半对任何变量均无显著影响(F(4,66) = 0.00-1.38;P < 0.05;ηp2 = 0.000 ~ 0.02),但每分钟的距离通常在前半段大于后半段(F(1,66) = 7.15;P = 0.01;ηp2 = 0.10)。在知觉反应方面,位置对守门员的知觉反应有显著影响,守门员的知觉反应评分明显低于其他位置(P < 0.05)。结论:踢球位置对各变量影响显著,其中守门员的要求最低,中卫次之。除了高强度的每分钟加速度(前锋)和最大速度(边后卫)外,中场球员在大多数变量上的身体输出都是最高的。配对一半对任何变量都没有显著影响,除了每分钟的距离。临床相关性:了解脑瘫足球的比赛需求和位置差异有助于教练计划量身定制的训练课程和训练,以满足特定的身体输出。这些知识支持训练周期、最佳球员表现和恢复。对每个位置的体能挑战的洞察有助于球探和调整训练强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信