The cognitive and neural bases of creative thought: A cross-domain systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation studies

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Melody M.Y. Chan , Eugene Cho , Matthew A. Lambon Ralph , Gail A. Robinson
{"title":"The cognitive and neural bases of creative thought: A cross-domain systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation studies","authors":"Melody M.Y. Chan ,&nbsp;Eugene Cho ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph ,&nbsp;Gail A. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Creative thought enables humans to flexibly generate, evaluate and select novel and adaptive ideas across different contexts. Decades of research indicates that it involves two key aspects: retrieval of previously acquired knowledge and manipulation of that knowledge. However, the cognitive processes underpinning these aspects remain underspecified. The broader clinical-cognitive neuroscience literature suggests these functions rely on general-purpose cognitive mechanisms supporting semantic cognition, controlled episodic memory retrieval, and executive mechanisms. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique widely used in creativity and cognitive neuroscience research to examine causal brain-behaviour relationships. To identify converging evidence toward a unifying neurocognitive account of creative thought, we reviewed and meta-analysed 145 sham-controlled tDCS studies (involving 8399 healthy participants aged 18–40), drawn from electronic databases and previous reviews, across creativity and relevant cognitive neuroscience literatures. The results revealed that, only left lateral frontal anodal tDCS promotes creativity (p &lt; .01). In parallel, anodal tDCS over the same region also promotes improvement in many other cognitive processes, including more efficient processing of semantic knowledge (p &lt; .05), more accurate episodic memory retrieval (p &lt; .05), better and more efficient manipulation of buffered knowledge (all p &lt; .001), better self-initiated response generation (i.e., energization; p &lt; .05), and more efficient response selection amongst competing options (i.e., task-setting; p &lt; .01). By merging these previously separate literatures, tDCS studies – although heavily biased toward frontal montages – support the notion that creative thought arises from general-purpose cognitive mechanisms including controlled retrieval and temporary storage of semantic and episodic information, as well as executive mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106237"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425002374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative thought enables humans to flexibly generate, evaluate and select novel and adaptive ideas across different contexts. Decades of research indicates that it involves two key aspects: retrieval of previously acquired knowledge and manipulation of that knowledge. However, the cognitive processes underpinning these aspects remain underspecified. The broader clinical-cognitive neuroscience literature suggests these functions rely on general-purpose cognitive mechanisms supporting semantic cognition, controlled episodic memory retrieval, and executive mechanisms. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique widely used in creativity and cognitive neuroscience research to examine causal brain-behaviour relationships. To identify converging evidence toward a unifying neurocognitive account of creative thought, we reviewed and meta-analysed 145 sham-controlled tDCS studies (involving 8399 healthy participants aged 18–40), drawn from electronic databases and previous reviews, across creativity and relevant cognitive neuroscience literatures. The results revealed that, only left lateral frontal anodal tDCS promotes creativity (p < .01). In parallel, anodal tDCS over the same region also promotes improvement in many other cognitive processes, including more efficient processing of semantic knowledge (p < .05), more accurate episodic memory retrieval (p < .05), better and more efficient manipulation of buffered knowledge (all p < .001), better self-initiated response generation (i.e., energization; p < .05), and more efficient response selection amongst competing options (i.e., task-setting; p < .01). By merging these previously separate literatures, tDCS studies – although heavily biased toward frontal montages – support the notion that creative thought arises from general-purpose cognitive mechanisms including controlled retrieval and temporary storage of semantic and episodic information, as well as executive mechanisms.
创造性思维的认知和神经基础:经颅直流电刺激研究的跨领域系统回顾和荟萃分析。
创造性思维使人类能够在不同的环境中灵活地产生、评估和选择新颖和适应性的想法。几十年的研究表明,它涉及两个关键方面:对先前获得的知识的检索和对该知识的操作。然而,支撑这些方面的认知过程仍然不明确。更广泛的临床认知神经科学文献表明,这些功能依赖于支持语义认知、受控情景记忆检索和执行机制的通用认知机制。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种广泛应用于创造力和认知神经科学研究的神经调节技术,用于研究脑-行为的因果关系。为了找到统一的创造性思维神经认知解释的证据,我们回顾并荟萃分析了145项假对照tDCS研究(涉及8,399名年龄在18-40岁的健康参与者),这些研究来自电子数据库和以前的综述,涉及创造力和相关认知神经科学文献。结果显示,只有左侧外侧额叶阳极tDCS能促进创造力(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信