Allee Effects and Coexistence.

IF 2.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1086/735419
Emma J Walker, Benjamin Gilbert
{"title":"Allee Effects and Coexistence.","authors":"Emma J Walker, Benjamin Gilbert","doi":"10.1086/735419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractAllee effects are common to diverse taxa, but their consequences for coexistence are rarely considered by ecologists. Recent research has suggested that Allee effects are incompatible with modern coexistence theory or that their impacts on coexistence are no different from other sources of positive density dependence that generate alternate stable states through priority effects. We use a graphical approach that builds on mathematically robust theory to develop simple conditions for coexistence and alternate stable states when an Allee effect is present. We show that weak Allee effects (those that do not depress population growth rates below zero in the absence of competition) can be integrated with modern coexistence theory but often produce outcomes distinct from other priority effects. This integration allows us to determine how Allee effects alter stabilizing and fitness differences. Importantly, we characterize a high-density criterion for a third alternate stable state that indicates species coexistence even when mutual invasibility is not met. Strong Allee effects (those that preclude invasibility even in the absence of competitors) permit coexistence only when the high-density criterion is satisfied. Our model offers an intuitive extension of modern coexistence theory that accounts for more than two alternative stable states and provides a guide for empirical research on how Allee effects structure ecological diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 6","pages":"559-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractAllee effects are common to diverse taxa, but their consequences for coexistence are rarely considered by ecologists. Recent research has suggested that Allee effects are incompatible with modern coexistence theory or that their impacts on coexistence are no different from other sources of positive density dependence that generate alternate stable states through priority effects. We use a graphical approach that builds on mathematically robust theory to develop simple conditions for coexistence and alternate stable states when an Allee effect is present. We show that weak Allee effects (those that do not depress population growth rates below zero in the absence of competition) can be integrated with modern coexistence theory but often produce outcomes distinct from other priority effects. This integration allows us to determine how Allee effects alter stabilizing and fitness differences. Importantly, we characterize a high-density criterion for a third alternate stable state that indicates species coexistence even when mutual invasibility is not met. Strong Allee effects (those that preclude invasibility even in the absence of competitors) permit coexistence only when the high-density criterion is satisfied. Our model offers an intuitive extension of modern coexistence theory that accounts for more than two alternative stable states and provides a guide for empirical research on how Allee effects structure ecological diversity.

小巷效应与共存。
摘要/ abstract摘要:生境效应在不同的分类群中是普遍存在的,但生态学家很少考虑它们对共存的影响。最近的研究表明,Allee效应与现代共存理论不相容,或者它们对共存的影响与其他通过优先效应产生交替稳定状态的正密度依赖来源没有什么不同。我们使用图形方法,建立在数学上稳健的理论,以发展简单的共存条件和交替稳定状态时,阿勒效应存在。我们表明,弱Allee效应(那些在缺乏竞争的情况下不会使人口增长率降至零以下的效应)可以与现代共存理论相结合,但往往产生与其他优先效应不同的结果。这种整合使我们能够确定Allee效应如何改变稳定性和适合度差异。重要的是,我们描述了第三种交替稳定状态的高密度标准,表明即使不满足相互入侵,物种也可以共存。强Allee效应(即使在没有竞争者的情况下也排除不可侵入性)只有在满足高密度标准时才允许共存。该模型为现代共存理论提供了一个直观的扩展,该理论可以解释两种以上的可选稳定状态,并为Allee效应如何结构生态多样性的实证研究提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信