{"title":"Allee Effects and Coexistence.","authors":"Emma J Walker, Benjamin Gilbert","doi":"10.1086/735419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractAllee effects are common to diverse taxa, but their consequences for coexistence are rarely considered by ecologists. Recent research has suggested that Allee effects are incompatible with modern coexistence theory or that their impacts on coexistence are no different from other sources of positive density dependence that generate alternate stable states through priority effects. We use a graphical approach that builds on mathematically robust theory to develop simple conditions for coexistence and alternate stable states when an Allee effect is present. We show that weak Allee effects (those that do not depress population growth rates below zero in the absence of competition) can be integrated with modern coexistence theory but often produce outcomes distinct from other priority effects. This integration allows us to determine how Allee effects alter stabilizing and fitness differences. Importantly, we characterize a high-density criterion for a third alternate stable state that indicates species coexistence even when mutual invasibility is not met. Strong Allee effects (those that preclude invasibility even in the absence of competitors) permit coexistence only when the high-density criterion is satisfied. Our model offers an intuitive extension of modern coexistence theory that accounts for more than two alternative stable states and provides a guide for empirical research on how Allee effects structure ecological diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 6","pages":"559-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractAllee effects are common to diverse taxa, but their consequences for coexistence are rarely considered by ecologists. Recent research has suggested that Allee effects are incompatible with modern coexistence theory or that their impacts on coexistence are no different from other sources of positive density dependence that generate alternate stable states through priority effects. We use a graphical approach that builds on mathematically robust theory to develop simple conditions for coexistence and alternate stable states when an Allee effect is present. We show that weak Allee effects (those that do not depress population growth rates below zero in the absence of competition) can be integrated with modern coexistence theory but often produce outcomes distinct from other priority effects. This integration allows us to determine how Allee effects alter stabilizing and fitness differences. Importantly, we characterize a high-density criterion for a third alternate stable state that indicates species coexistence even when mutual invasibility is not met. Strong Allee effects (those that preclude invasibility even in the absence of competitors) permit coexistence only when the high-density criterion is satisfied. Our model offers an intuitive extension of modern coexistence theory that accounts for more than two alternative stable states and provides a guide for empirical research on how Allee effects structure ecological diversity.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.