Does choice of neighborhood disadvantage index matter? An application with preterm birth disparities in North Carolina

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
KN Cowan , SC Haight , JK Edwards , TJ Luben , CL Martin
{"title":"Does choice of neighborhood disadvantage index matter? An application with preterm birth disparities in North Carolina","authors":"KN Cowan ,&nbsp;SC Haight ,&nbsp;JK Edwards ,&nbsp;TJ Luben ,&nbsp;CL Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epidemiologists often investigate the impacts of neighborhood disadvantage (ND) on health using indices created from publicly available data. However, it is not clear how choice of ND index impacts results. We (1) determined commonly used ND indices in recent epidemiological research and (2) investigated how choice of index impacts the magnitude of the racial disparity in preterm birth (PTB) by level of ND. We reviewed abstracts in epidemiology journals and conferences from 2020 to 2023 to determine commonly used ND indices and assigned them to birth records for singleton live births with no birth defects to non-Hispanic (NH) Black and NH White birthing parents in North Carolina, 2016–2018. Prevalence differences in PTB per 100 births were estimated using linear binomial regression comparing births from NH Black and NH White birthing parents, stratified by ND index quartile. The most used indices in perinatal-specific research were the Neighborhood Deprivation Index, racial and economic Index of Concentration at the Extremes, Social Vulnerability Index, and Area Deprivation Index. We observed no significant differences in the magnitude of the Black-White disparity in PTB by ND index. While there were no notable differences in estimates, interpretation of results should consider the intent of an index and its components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279725001139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiologists often investigate the impacts of neighborhood disadvantage (ND) on health using indices created from publicly available data. However, it is not clear how choice of ND index impacts results. We (1) determined commonly used ND indices in recent epidemiological research and (2) investigated how choice of index impacts the magnitude of the racial disparity in preterm birth (PTB) by level of ND. We reviewed abstracts in epidemiology journals and conferences from 2020 to 2023 to determine commonly used ND indices and assigned them to birth records for singleton live births with no birth defects to non-Hispanic (NH) Black and NH White birthing parents in North Carolina, 2016–2018. Prevalence differences in PTB per 100 births were estimated using linear binomial regression comparing births from NH Black and NH White birthing parents, stratified by ND index quartile. The most used indices in perinatal-specific research were the Neighborhood Deprivation Index, racial and economic Index of Concentration at the Extremes, Social Vulnerability Index, and Area Deprivation Index. We observed no significant differences in the magnitude of the Black-White disparity in PTB by ND index. While there were no notable differences in estimates, interpretation of results should consider the intent of an index and its components.
邻域劣势指数的选择重要吗?北卡罗来纳州早产差异的应用程序。
流行病学家经常使用根据公开数据创建的指数来调查邻里劣势(ND)对健康的影响。然而,ND指数的选择对结果的影响尚不清楚。我们(1)确定了最近流行病学研究中常用的ND指标;(2)研究了指标的选择如何影响ND水平对早产(PTB)种族差异的程度。我们回顾了2020-2023年流行病学期刊和会议的摘要,以确定常用的ND指数,并将其分配到2016-2018年北卡罗来纳州非西班牙裔(NH)黑人和NH白人出生父母的无出生缺陷单胎活产的出生记录中。采用线性二项回归比较NH黑人和NH白人父母出生的新生儿,按ND指数四分位数分层,估计每100个新生儿中肺结核患病率的差异。围产期特异性研究中使用最多的指标是邻里剥夺指数、种族和经济极端集中指数、社会脆弱性指数和区域剥夺指数。通过ND指数,我们观察到PTB的黑白差异程度无显著差异。虽然估计值之间没有显著差异,但对结果的解释应考虑到指数及其组成部分的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信