Knowledge gaps and radiation exposure concerns: Time for a revamp of radiation training structures for trainee surgeons.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lylas Aljohmani, Aoife Gaffney, Linda Kelly, Lucy-Anne O'Sullivan, Eunice Leyva, Michael O'Connor, Jackie McCavana, Eric Heffernan, Christine Quinlan, Roisin Dolan
{"title":"Knowledge gaps and radiation exposure concerns: Time for a revamp of radiation training structures for trainee surgeons.","authors":"Lylas Aljohmani, Aoife Gaffney, Linda Kelly, Lucy-Anne O'Sullivan, Eunice Leyva, Michael O'Connor, Jackie McCavana, Eric Heffernan, Christine Quinlan, Roisin Dolan","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess surgical trainee knowledge of occupational radiation exposure, personal protection equipment (PPE) compliance, and prior radiation protection training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional quantitative study using a questionnaire-based survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care hospitals in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>79 surgical trainees across six surgical disciplines, with a 70 % response rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine of 112 surgical trainees (70 %) completed the survey. Most were specialist registrars (47 %), with orthopaedics, plastic surgery, and urology comprising 70 % of respondents. Although 78 % had attended a radiation safety course, 40 % lacked fluoroscopy-specific training. Knowledge gaps were evident-60 % of questions were commonly answered incorrectly, with only 11 % correctly identifying CT radiation dose. Despite frequent fluoroscopy use, dosimeter use was poor: only 7.6 % always wore one. Prior training correlated with increased PPE use and awareness of long-term radiation risks, including fertility concerns. While 67 % expressed concern about exposure, only 21.5 % said it influenced speciality choice. The most used PPE was lead skirt/top (72 %), followed by thyroid shield (52 %), while lead glasses and gloves were rarely worn.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant knowledge gaps and low PPE compliance were observed amongst surgical trainees. Given the strong desire for further training, we recommend a modernised, interactive national radiation safety training program tailored to surgical specialities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.05.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess surgical trainee knowledge of occupational radiation exposure, personal protection equipment (PPE) compliance, and prior radiation protection training.

Design: A cross-sectional quantitative study using a questionnaire-based survey.

Setting: Tertiary care hospitals in Ireland.

Participants: 79 surgical trainees across six surgical disciplines, with a 70 % response rate.

Results: Seventy-nine of 112 surgical trainees (70 %) completed the survey. Most were specialist registrars (47 %), with orthopaedics, plastic surgery, and urology comprising 70 % of respondents. Although 78 % had attended a radiation safety course, 40 % lacked fluoroscopy-specific training. Knowledge gaps were evident-60 % of questions were commonly answered incorrectly, with only 11 % correctly identifying CT radiation dose. Despite frequent fluoroscopy use, dosimeter use was poor: only 7.6 % always wore one. Prior training correlated with increased PPE use and awareness of long-term radiation risks, including fertility concerns. While 67 % expressed concern about exposure, only 21.5 % said it influenced speciality choice. The most used PPE was lead skirt/top (72 %), followed by thyroid shield (52 %), while lead glasses and gloves were rarely worn.

Conclusion: Significant knowledge gaps and low PPE compliance were observed amongst surgical trainees. Given the strong desire for further training, we recommend a modernised, interactive national radiation safety training program tailored to surgical specialities.

知识差距和辐射暴露问题:是时候对实习外科医生的辐射培训结构进行改革了。
目的:本研究旨在评估外科培训生的职业辐射暴露知识、个人防护装备(PPE)符合性以及先前的辐射防护培训。设计:采用基于问卷的横断面定量研究。环境:爱尔兰三级保健医院。参与者:来自6个外科学科的79名外科实习生,反应率为70%。结果:112名外科培训生中有79人(70%)完成了调查。大多数是专科登记员(47%),其中骨科、整形外科和泌尿外科占70%。虽然78%的人参加过辐射安全课程,但40%的人缺乏专门的透视培训。知识差距很明显——60%的问题通常回答错误,只有11%的问题正确识别了CT辐射剂量。尽管经常使用透视检查,但剂量计的使用很差:只有7.6%的人总是佩戴剂量计。先前的培训与PPE使用的增加和对长期辐射风险的认识相关,包括生育问题。虽然67%的人表示担心暴露,但只有21.5%的人表示这会影响专业选择。使用最多的PPE是铅裙/上衣(72%),其次是甲状腺屏蔽(52%),而很少戴铅眼镜和手套。结论:外科培训生存在明显的知识缺口和较低的PPE依从性。鉴于对进一步培训的强烈愿望,我们建议为外科专业量身定制一个现代化的、互动的国家辐射安全培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信