Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study.

Q3 Dentistry

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3835

Bharath Vardhana, Prabha Shree, Priya Subramaniam, Sourav Chandra Bidyasagar Bal, Bismay Singh, Jnana R Swain, Meenakshi Chopra

{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study.","authors":"Bharath Vardhana, Prabha Shree, Priya Subramaniam, Sourav Chandra Bidyasagar Bal, Bismay Singh, Jnana R Swain, Meenakshi Chopra","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of composite restorations restored by short fiber-reinforced and bulk-fill resin composites in the primary posterior teeth.Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 100 primary molars in children aged from 6 to 10 years having occlusal caries. Selected 100 primary molars were randomly divided into two groups, group A (EXF) and group B (TNC). Teeth were clinically evaluated using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.Results: Bulk-fill composite showed marginal disintegration compared to short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC). No significant difference was observed for other parameters evaluated under USPHS criteria at different follow-up periods except for marginal adaptation favoring the SFRC at 3 and 6 months.Conclusion: This study supports SRFC as a preferable material choice over bulk-fill composite resin, offering valuable guidance to dental professionals in clinical decision-making.Clinical significance: Incorporation of short glass fibers in Ever X Flow enhances marginal adaptability and minimizes microleakage at restorative margins. How to cite this article: Vardhana B, Shree P, Subramaniam P, et al. Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(3):229-233.","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 3","pages":"229-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of composite restorations restored by short fiber-reinforced and bulk-fill resin composites in the primary posterior teeth.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 100 primary molars in children aged from 6 to 10 years having occlusal caries. Selected 100 primary molars were randomly divided into two groups, group A (EXF) and group B (TNC). Teeth were clinically evaluated using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.

Results: Bulk-fill composite showed marginal disintegration compared to short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC). No significant difference was observed for other parameters evaluated under USPHS criteria at different follow-up periods except for marginal adaptation favoring the SFRC at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion: This study supports SRFC as a preferable material choice over bulk-fill composite resin, offering valuable guidance to dental professionals in clinical decision-making.

Clinical significance: Incorporation of short glass fibers in Ever X Flow enhances marginal adaptability and minimizes microleakage at restorative margins. How to cite this article: Vardhana B, Shree P, Subramaniam P, et al. Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(3):229-233.

查看原文本刊更多论文

SFRC与体块填充树脂复合材料修复初级后牙的体内比较研究。

目的：评价短纤维增强体填充树脂复合材料修复初级后牙的临床效果。材料与方法：对6 ~ 10岁有牙合龋的儿童100颗初生磨牙进行研究。选择100颗初生磨牙，随机分为A组（EXF）和B组（TNC）。使用美国公共卫生服务（USPHS）标准对牙齿进行临床评估。结果：与短纤维增强复合材料（SFRC）相比，大块填充复合材料表现出边缘崩解。在不同的随访期间，USPHS标准评估的其他参数没有观察到显著差异，除了在3个月和6个月时有利于SFRC的边际适应。结论：本研究支持SRFC作为一种较好的材料选择，为牙科专业人员的临床决策提供了有价值的指导。临床意义：Ever X Flow中加入短玻璃纤维增强了边缘适应性，减少了修复边缘的微渗漏。如何引用本文：Vardhana B， Shree P， Subramaniam P等。SFRC与体块填充树脂复合材料修复初级后牙的体内比较研究。[J] .现代医学杂志，2015;26(3):229-233。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

174

期刊介绍： The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.