[Stereo-EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulations in drug-resistant focal epilepsy].

Q4 Medicine
A V Dimertsev, N V Pedyash, Kh O Shavkatbekov, N P Utyashev, E A Gordeeva, A A Zuev, Yu V Batmanova
{"title":"[Stereo-EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulations in drug-resistant focal epilepsy].","authors":"A V Dimertsev, N V Pedyash, Kh O Shavkatbekov, N P Utyashev, E A Gordeeva, A A Zuev, Yu V Batmanova","doi":"10.17116/neiro2025890317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative examination of patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy requires invasive diagnostic methods in 30-40% of cases. Stereo-EEG is one of them and often the most significant for verification of epileptogenic zone and its subsequent resection. The desire to minimize surgical trauma led to idea of local radiofrequency thermocoagulation through SEEG electrodes [1]. This allows destruction of epileptogenic zones during examination. Despite the safety of this method, appropriate studies are contradictory and require further analysis [2].</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify the role of radiofrequency thermocoagulation in diagnosis and treatment of patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study included 75 patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent radiofrequency thermocoagulation between 2020 and 2023. The results were assessed 6 and 12 months after thermocoagulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six-month freedom from seizures was 35% (26 patients). Seizure rate decreased by more than 50% (McHugh I-II) in 39 (52%) patients. Most patients with the McHugh II outcome (10 out of 12) experienced less incidence and intensity of seizures. This made unnecessary subsequent surgery. MR-negative nature of epilepsy (<i>p</i>=0.015), right-sided localization of epileptogenic substrate (<i>p</i>=0.032) and bihemispheric distribution (<i>p</i>=0.05) were negative predictors of treatment outcomes. A relationship was found between localization of radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the frontal lobe and freedom from seizures. Mean volume of one thermocoagulation point was 0.98±0.3 cm<sup>3</sup>. The number of points did not significantly influence the outcomes either for the McHugh scale (<i>p</i>=0.654) or for the Engel scale (<i>p</i>=0.288). Total volume of thermocoagulation foci ranged from 0.52 to 13.5 cm<sup>3</sup> (mean 3.85±2.9). Twenty-six (35%) patients underwent surgery for persistent and/or recurrent seizures after radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided resection of epileptogenic zones). After 12 months, freedom from seizures was 28% (21 patients), seizure rate decrease by more than 50% (McHugh I-II) was observed in 33 (44%) patients. McHugh class III outcome was observed in 12 patients (16%). MR-negative nature of epilepsy (<i>p</i>=0.009) and right-sided localization of epileptogenic substrate (<i>p</i><0.001) were negative predictors regarding Engel I outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stereo-EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation is a unique and safe technique significantly reducing the incidence and intensity of epileptic seizures in patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy with minimal iatrogenic risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"89 3","pages":"7-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro2025890317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative examination of patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy requires invasive diagnostic methods in 30-40% of cases. Stereo-EEG is one of them and often the most significant for verification of epileptogenic zone and its subsequent resection. The desire to minimize surgical trauma led to idea of local radiofrequency thermocoagulation through SEEG electrodes [1]. This allows destruction of epileptogenic zones during examination. Despite the safety of this method, appropriate studies are contradictory and require further analysis [2].

Objective: To clarify the role of radiofrequency thermocoagulation in diagnosis and treatment of patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy.

Material and methods: A single-center retrospective study included 75 patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent radiofrequency thermocoagulation between 2020 and 2023. The results were assessed 6 and 12 months after thermocoagulation.

Results: Six-month freedom from seizures was 35% (26 patients). Seizure rate decreased by more than 50% (McHugh I-II) in 39 (52%) patients. Most patients with the McHugh II outcome (10 out of 12) experienced less incidence and intensity of seizures. This made unnecessary subsequent surgery. MR-negative nature of epilepsy (p=0.015), right-sided localization of epileptogenic substrate (p=0.032) and bihemispheric distribution (p=0.05) were negative predictors of treatment outcomes. A relationship was found between localization of radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the frontal lobe and freedom from seizures. Mean volume of one thermocoagulation point was 0.98±0.3 cm3. The number of points did not significantly influence the outcomes either for the McHugh scale (p=0.654) or for the Engel scale (p=0.288). Total volume of thermocoagulation foci ranged from 0.52 to 13.5 cm3 (mean 3.85±2.9). Twenty-six (35%) patients underwent surgery for persistent and/or recurrent seizures after radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided resection of epileptogenic zones). After 12 months, freedom from seizures was 28% (21 patients), seizure rate decrease by more than 50% (McHugh I-II) was observed in 33 (44%) patients. McHugh class III outcome was observed in 12 patients (16%). MR-negative nature of epilepsy (p=0.009) and right-sided localization of epileptogenic substrate (p<0.001) were negative predictors regarding Engel I outcomes.

Conclusion: Stereo-EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation is a unique and safe technique significantly reducing the incidence and intensity of epileptic seizures in patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy with minimal iatrogenic risk.

[立体脑电图引导射频热凝治疗耐药局灶性癫痫]。
背景:30-40%的局灶性耐药癫痫患者术前检查需要采用侵入性诊断方法。立体脑电图是其中的一种,通常是最重要的癫痫区验证和随后的切除。为了尽量减少手术创伤,我们提出了通过SEEG电极[1]进行局部射频热凝的想法。这允许在检查时破坏致癫痫区。尽管这种方法是安全的,但适当的研究是矛盾的,需要进一步分析。目的:探讨射频热凝在局灶性耐药癫痫诊断和治疗中的作用。材料和方法:一项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2020年至2023年间接受射频热凝治疗的75例局灶性耐药癫痫患者。在热凝后6个月和12个月评估结果。结果:6个月癫痫发作自由率为35%(26例)。39例(52%)患者癫痫发作率下降50%以上(McHugh I-II)。大多数McHugh II型患者(12例中有10例)癫痫发作的发生率和强度都较低。这导致了不必要的后续手术。癫痫的mri阴性性质(p=0.015)、癫痫源性底物的右侧定位(p=0.032)和双脑分布(p=0.05)是治疗结果的阴性预测因子。发现了额叶射频热凝定位与癫痫发作自由之间的关系。一个热凝点的平均体积为0.98±0.3 cm3。无论是McHugh量表(p=0.654)还是Engel量表(p=0.288),点数对结果都没有显著影响。热凝病灶的总体积范围为0.52 ~ 13.5 cm3(平均3.85±2.9)。26例(35%)患者在射频热凝(seeg引导下切除致痫区)后接受了持续和/或复发性癫痫发作的手术。12个月后,21例(28%)患者癫痫不再发作,33例(44%)患者癫痫发作率下降50%以上(McHugh I-II)。12例患者(16%)观察到McHugh III级结局。结论:立体脑电图引导下射频热凝是一种独特、安全的技术,可显著降低局灶性耐药癫痫患者癫痫发作的发生率和强度,且医源性风险最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信