Tianfu Ding, Zheng Xu, Zhongyue Huang, Weiguo Hu, Bo Xiao, Jianxing Li
{"title":"Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study.","authors":"Tianfu Ding, Zheng Xu, Zhongyue Huang, Weiguo Hu, Bo Xiao, Jianxing Li","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01773-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01773-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.