Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tianfu Ding, Zheng Xu, Zhongyue Huang, Weiguo Hu, Bo Xiao, Jianxing Li
{"title":"Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study.","authors":"Tianfu Ding, Zheng Xu, Zhongyue Huang, Weiguo Hu, Bo Xiao, Jianxing Li","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01773-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01773-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.

体外研究中优化RIRS抽吸效率:内窥镜-鞘直径比、灌洗流量和负压的影响
目的探讨体外条件下内窥镜-肾鞘直径比(RESD)、冲洗率和负压对逆行肾内手术(RIRS)中结石碎片吸出效率的影响。精确量取5克结石碎片,置于肾花萼内。将带有柔性可调导航输尿管吸入套(FANS)的柔性输尿管镜引入肾盂,并连接冲洗泵和吸入泵。一名泌尿科医生进行了1分钟的模拟术中抽吸操作。从抽吸系统中收集剩余的石粉,干燥并重新称重。实验变量包括输尿管镜尺寸(7.5Fr和8.6Fr)、FANS尺寸(10/12Fr和12/14Fr)、负压水平(0.02 MPa和0.01 MPa)和冲洗流量(100、150、200、250和300 ml/min)。肾盆腔内压力实时监测与数字压力传感器探头在肾盂。实验在上、中、下萼进行,每个参数组合随机重复5次,以确保统计可靠性。研究表明,在低负压(0.01 MPa)条件下,碎石吸出效率与灌溉流量呈抛物线关系。在所有输尿管镜-风扇配置中,在200 ml/min时观察到最高效率。将负压升高至0.02 MPa可显著提高抽吸效率,在200 ml/min时保持峰值性能。肾盏位置的不同对抽吸效率有显著影响,下盏抽吸效率明显低于上盏和中盏。较小的风扇-内窥镜比例(例如,10/12Fr UAS, 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75)在200 ml/min, 0.02 MPa下,与较大的护套(12/14Fr风扇,RESD = 0.64)相比,吸入效率降低27.2%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信