Tsirelson's Inequality for the Precession Protocol Is Maximally Violated by Quantum Theory.

IF 8.1 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lin Htoo Zaw, Mirjam Weilenmann, Valerio Scarani
{"title":"Tsirelson's Inequality for the Precession Protocol Is Maximally Violated by Quantum Theory.","authors":"Lin Htoo Zaw, Mirjam Weilenmann, Valerio Scarani","doi":"10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.190201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The precession protocol involves measuring P_{3}, the probability that a uniformly precessing observable (like the position of a harmonic oscillator or a coordinate undergoing spatial rotation) is positive at one of three equally spaced times. Tsirelson's inequality, which states that P_{3}≤2/3 in classical theory, is violated in quantum theory by certain states. In this Letter, we address some open questions about the inequality: What is the maximum violation of Tsirelson's inequality possible in quantum theory? Might other theories do better? By considering the precession protocol in a theory-independent manner for systems with finitely many outcomes, we derive a general bound for the maximum possible violation. This theory-independent bound must be satisfied by any theory whose expectation values are linear functions of observables-which includes classical, quantum, and all general probabilistic theories-and depends only on the minimum positive and negative measurement outcomes. Given any such two values, we prove by construction that quantum theory always saturates this bound. Some notable examples include the angular momentum of a spin-3/2 particle and a family of observables that outperform the quantum harmonic oscillator in the precession protocol. Finally, we also relate our findings to the recently introduced notion of constrained conditional probabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20069,"journal":{"name":"Physical review letters","volume":"134 19","pages":"190201"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical review letters","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.190201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The precession protocol involves measuring P_{3}, the probability that a uniformly precessing observable (like the position of a harmonic oscillator or a coordinate undergoing spatial rotation) is positive at one of three equally spaced times. Tsirelson's inequality, which states that P_{3}≤2/3 in classical theory, is violated in quantum theory by certain states. In this Letter, we address some open questions about the inequality: What is the maximum violation of Tsirelson's inequality possible in quantum theory? Might other theories do better? By considering the precession protocol in a theory-independent manner for systems with finitely many outcomes, we derive a general bound for the maximum possible violation. This theory-independent bound must be satisfied by any theory whose expectation values are linear functions of observables-which includes classical, quantum, and all general probabilistic theories-and depends only on the minimum positive and negative measurement outcomes. Given any such two values, we prove by construction that quantum theory always saturates this bound. Some notable examples include the angular momentum of a spin-3/2 particle and a family of observables that outperform the quantum harmonic oscillator in the precession protocol. Finally, we also relate our findings to the recently introduced notion of constrained conditional probabilities.

量子理论极大地违背了进动协议的Tsirelson不等式。
进动方案包括测量P_{3},即均匀进动观测(如谐振子的位置或经历空间旋转的坐标)在三个等间隔时间中的一个为正的概率。Tsirelson不等式,在经典理论中指出P_{3}≤2/3,在量子理论中被某些状态所违背。在这封信中,我们解决了一些关于不等式的开放性问题:在量子理论中Tsirelson不等式可能的最大违逆是什么?其他理论会不会更好呢?通过以理论无关的方式考虑具有有限多个结果的系统的进动协议,我们导出了最大可能违背的一般界。任何期望值是可观测值的线性函数的理论(包括经典理论、量子理论和所有一般概率理论)都必须满足这个与理论无关的边界,并且只依赖于最小的正和负测量结果。给定任意两个这样的值,我们通过构造证明了量子论总是饱和于这个界。一些值得注意的例子包括自旋为3/2的粒子的角动量,以及在进动协议中优于量子谐振子的一系列可观测值。最后,我们还将我们的发现与最近引入的约束条件概率的概念联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical review letters
Physical review letters 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
7.00%
发文量
2673
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Physical review letters(PRL)covers the full range of applied, fundamental, and interdisciplinary physics research topics: General physics, including statistical and quantum mechanics and quantum information Gravitation, astrophysics, and cosmology Elementary particles and fields Nuclear physics Atomic, molecular, and optical physics Nonlinear dynamics, fluid dynamics, and classical optics Plasma and beam physics Condensed matter and materials physics Polymers, soft matter, biological, climate and interdisciplinary physics, including networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信