Alessia M Iommiello, Paolo Pesce, Consuela Sanavia, Francesca Arata, Vito C Caponio, Domenico Baldi, Marco Migliorati, Maria Menini
{"title":"The use of water flosser in implant-supported fixed prosthesis: a narrative review and the opinion of Italian dental hygienists.","authors":"Alessia M Iommiello, Paolo Pesce, Consuela Sanavia, Francesca Arata, Vito C Caponio, Domenico Baldi, Marco Migliorati, Maria Menini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05105-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the opinion of Italian dental hygienists about the use of domiciliary water flosser for the oral hygiene of implant-supported fixed prostheses.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A narrative review of the literature is presented, and a digital questionnaire was shared on Facebook professional groups to be anonymously filled by Italian dental hygienists. A descriptive analysis of the answers was conducted.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Three hundred thirty-three dental hygienists participated of which 34% have worked for 0-5 years, 27.4% for 6-10 years, 26.81 27% for 10-20 years, and 11.14% for more than 20 years. Water flosser was recommended by the 49,7%. A small proportion of respondents, the 7.83%, thought that this intervention could cause emphysema/abscesses, while the 43.98% and the 36.75% believed respectively that it was either ineffective in the plaque removal or even it could push the biofilm under the gums. The 12.35% believed that the water flosser could cause gum recession, was difficult to use (20.48%) and it could damage the prosthodontic and implant components (1.2%). These information were acquired from textbooks (31.63%), web (25%), universities courses (57.23%), companies (25.6%), other courses (38.25%) and personal experience (6.33%). The 48.2% of the hygienists reported that they were often asked from their patients about water flosser, 47.3% rarely, 1.25% always and 3.3% never.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the scientific literature supports the use of water flosser in terms of efficacy and safety, Italian dental hygienists rarely recommend it for home oral hygiene of implant-supported prostheses mainly because they consider it ineffective or even dangerous.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05105-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the opinion of Italian dental hygienists about the use of domiciliary water flosser for the oral hygiene of implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Evidence acquisition: A narrative review of the literature is presented, and a digital questionnaire was shared on Facebook professional groups to be anonymously filled by Italian dental hygienists. A descriptive analysis of the answers was conducted.
Evidence synthesis: Three hundred thirty-three dental hygienists participated of which 34% have worked for 0-5 years, 27.4% for 6-10 years, 26.81 27% for 10-20 years, and 11.14% for more than 20 years. Water flosser was recommended by the 49,7%. A small proportion of respondents, the 7.83%, thought that this intervention could cause emphysema/abscesses, while the 43.98% and the 36.75% believed respectively that it was either ineffective in the plaque removal or even it could push the biofilm under the gums. The 12.35% believed that the water flosser could cause gum recession, was difficult to use (20.48%) and it could damage the prosthodontic and implant components (1.2%). These information were acquired from textbooks (31.63%), web (25%), universities courses (57.23%), companies (25.6%), other courses (38.25%) and personal experience (6.33%). The 48.2% of the hygienists reported that they were often asked from their patients about water flosser, 47.3% rarely, 1.25% always and 3.3% never.
Conclusions: Although the scientific literature supports the use of water flosser in terms of efficacy and safety, Italian dental hygienists rarely recommend it for home oral hygiene of implant-supported prostheses mainly because they consider it ineffective or even dangerous.