The use of water flosser in implant-supported fixed prosthesis: a narrative review and the opinion of Italian dental hygienists.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alessia M Iommiello, Paolo Pesce, Consuela Sanavia, Francesca Arata, Vito C Caponio, Domenico Baldi, Marco Migliorati, Maria Menini
{"title":"The use of water flosser in implant-supported fixed prosthesis: a narrative review and the opinion of Italian dental hygienists.","authors":"Alessia M Iommiello, Paolo Pesce, Consuela Sanavia, Francesca Arata, Vito C Caponio, Domenico Baldi, Marco Migliorati, Maria Menini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05105-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the opinion of Italian dental hygienists about the use of domiciliary water flosser for the oral hygiene of implant-supported fixed prostheses.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A narrative review of the literature is presented, and a digital questionnaire was shared on Facebook professional groups to be anonymously filled by Italian dental hygienists. A descriptive analysis of the answers was conducted.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Three hundred thirty-three dental hygienists participated of which 34% have worked for 0-5 years, 27.4% for 6-10 years, 26.81 27% for 10-20 years, and 11.14% for more than 20 years. Water flosser was recommended by the 49,7%. A small proportion of respondents, the 7.83%, thought that this intervention could cause emphysema/abscesses, while the 43.98% and the 36.75% believed respectively that it was either ineffective in the plaque removal or even it could push the biofilm under the gums. The 12.35% believed that the water flosser could cause gum recession, was difficult to use (20.48%) and it could damage the prosthodontic and implant components (1.2%). These information were acquired from textbooks (31.63%), web (25%), universities courses (57.23%), companies (25.6%), other courses (38.25%) and personal experience (6.33%). The 48.2% of the hygienists reported that they were often asked from their patients about water flosser, 47.3% rarely, 1.25% always and 3.3% never.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the scientific literature supports the use of water flosser in terms of efficacy and safety, Italian dental hygienists rarely recommend it for home oral hygiene of implant-supported prostheses mainly because they consider it ineffective or even dangerous.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05105-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the opinion of Italian dental hygienists about the use of domiciliary water flosser for the oral hygiene of implant-supported fixed prostheses.

Evidence acquisition: A narrative review of the literature is presented, and a digital questionnaire was shared on Facebook professional groups to be anonymously filled by Italian dental hygienists. A descriptive analysis of the answers was conducted.

Evidence synthesis: Three hundred thirty-three dental hygienists participated of which 34% have worked for 0-5 years, 27.4% for 6-10 years, 26.81 27% for 10-20 years, and 11.14% for more than 20 years. Water flosser was recommended by the 49,7%. A small proportion of respondents, the 7.83%, thought that this intervention could cause emphysema/abscesses, while the 43.98% and the 36.75% believed respectively that it was either ineffective in the plaque removal or even it could push the biofilm under the gums. The 12.35% believed that the water flosser could cause gum recession, was difficult to use (20.48%) and it could damage the prosthodontic and implant components (1.2%). These information were acquired from textbooks (31.63%), web (25%), universities courses (57.23%), companies (25.6%), other courses (38.25%) and personal experience (6.33%). The 48.2% of the hygienists reported that they were often asked from their patients about water flosser, 47.3% rarely, 1.25% always and 3.3% never.

Conclusions: Although the scientific literature supports the use of water flosser in terms of efficacy and safety, Italian dental hygienists rarely recommend it for home oral hygiene of implant-supported prostheses mainly because they consider it ineffective or even dangerous.

水牙线在种植体固定义齿中的应用:意大利牙科保健师的观点和评述。
前言:本研究的目的是评估意大利牙科保健师对使用家用水牙线用于种植固定修复体口腔卫生的看法。证据获取:对文献进行叙述性回顾,并在Facebook专业小组上分享一份数字问卷,由意大利牙科保健师匿名填写。对答案进行了描述性分析。证据综合:参与调查的333名口腔卫生员中,工作0-5年占34%,6-10年占27.4%,10-20年占26.81 27%,20年以上占11.14%。49.7%的人推荐使用水牙线。一小部分受访者(7.83%)认为这种干预会导致肺气肿/脓肿,而分别有43.98%和36.75%的受访者认为这种干预对牙菌斑清除无效,甚至会将生物膜推到牙龈下。12.35%的人认为水牙线会导致牙龈萎缩,使用困难(20.48%),会损坏修复体和种植体组件(1.2%)。这些信息分别来自课本(31.63%)、网络(25%)、大学课程(57.23%)、公司(25.6%)、其他课程(38.25%)和个人经历(6.33%)。48.2%的卫生员经常被患者问及水牙线,47.3%的人很少被问及,1.25%的人经常被问及,3.3%的人从未被问及。结论:尽管科学文献支持使用水牙线的有效性和安全性,但意大利牙科保健师很少推荐水牙线用于种植体支持修复体的家庭口腔卫生,主要是因为他们认为水牙线无效甚至危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信