Nicola Ferri, Alessandro Bracci, Giacomo Metta Franceschelli, Giacomo Gnoli, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano
{"title":"Accuracy of video head impulse test in stroke diagnosis during acute vestibular syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Nicola Ferri, Alessandro Bracci, Giacomo Metta Franceschelli, Giacomo Gnoli, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13174-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertigo is a common symptom in people with acute stroke, leading to difficulty in the diagnostic process. This study aims to systematically report the accuracy of the video head impulse test (vHIT) for diagnosing stroke in individuals presenting to emergency departments with acute vertigo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and gray literature were searched from inception to July 2024 without language limits. Independent researchers created a contingency table to record the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. A bivariate analysis was performed to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. A quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 studies (905 participants) were included. EyeSeeCam (6/13) and Otometrics (6/13) were the most represented vHIT devices. The studies were of good quality, with the flow and timing being the more prevalent domain presenting a high risk of bias (7/13); however, there were no concerns about applicability. The vHIT had a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 61%-95%), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 70%-92%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 5.56 (95% CI, 2.00-15.47), negative LR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.35), and diagnostic odd ratio of 30.23 (95% CI, 8.96-102.06), making this test particularly useful for ruling out strokes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the value of vHIT as a complementary tool in early diagnosis of stroke. Thus, expertise in its use and interpretation should be promoted, and future primary studies are expected to refine and update this systematic review. Prospero registration CRD42024532776.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 6","pages":"436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13174-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vertigo is a common symptom in people with acute stroke, leading to difficulty in the diagnostic process. This study aims to systematically report the accuracy of the video head impulse test (vHIT) for diagnosing stroke in individuals presenting to emergency departments with acute vertigo.
Methods: Data from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and gray literature were searched from inception to July 2024 without language limits. Independent researchers created a contingency table to record the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. A bivariate analysis was performed to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. A quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies 2 tool.
Results: 13 studies (905 participants) were included. EyeSeeCam (6/13) and Otometrics (6/13) were the most represented vHIT devices. The studies were of good quality, with the flow and timing being the more prevalent domain presenting a high risk of bias (7/13); however, there were no concerns about applicability. The vHIT had a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 61%-95%), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 70%-92%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 5.56 (95% CI, 2.00-15.47), negative LR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.35), and diagnostic odd ratio of 30.23 (95% CI, 8.96-102.06), making this test particularly useful for ruling out strokes.
Conclusion: This review highlights the value of vHIT as a complementary tool in early diagnosis of stroke. Thus, expertise in its use and interpretation should be promoted, and future primary studies are expected to refine and update this systematic review. Prospero registration CRD42024532776.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.