Exploring Typologies of Immediacy Events in Psychodynamic Therapy: A Latent Class Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Anna Mylona, Evrinomy Avdi, Julie Vaiopoulou
{"title":"Exploring Typologies of Immediacy Events in Psychodynamic Therapy: A Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"Anna Mylona, Evrinomy Avdi, Julie Vaiopoulou","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immediacy is a therapeutic intervention that entails the explicit discussion between therapist and client about their relationship in the here-and-now. It is considered a potentially powerful intervention that can facilitate relational processing, especially in psychodynamic psychotherapies. Τhis study aims to explore the use of immediacy in psychodynamic psychotherapy through a case-series analysis. Videos of 139 sessions, drawn from 7 psychotherapies with 2 therapists, were coded in terms of the type of immediacy used and its immediate effects, as reflected in the client's response. A total of 121 immediacy events were identified in 57 sessions, occupying 8% of the total therapy time; the majority were initiated by the therapist. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to explore where there exist clusters of immediacy events that share patterns of immediacy type and effect. Two distinct clusters of immediacy events were identified. The most common group, which we termed 'limited engagement in immediacy', was characterised by a primarily insight-oriented agenda on the therapist's part, smooth collaboration during the immediacy event, and limited engagement on the client's part. The second cluster, termed 'mutual engagement in immediacy,' reflected more complex processes characterised by conflict, with the therapist using a range of interventions (from alliance-building to insight-oriented interventions), evidence of disruption in the therapist-client collaboration, and the client showing increased engagement and reporting improvement. The findings are discussed drawing upon the literature on the processes of repairing ruptures in the therapeutic alliance and clinical implications regarding the use of immediacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immediacy is a therapeutic intervention that entails the explicit discussion between therapist and client about their relationship in the here-and-now. It is considered a potentially powerful intervention that can facilitate relational processing, especially in psychodynamic psychotherapies. Τhis study aims to explore the use of immediacy in psychodynamic psychotherapy through a case-series analysis. Videos of 139 sessions, drawn from 7 psychotherapies with 2 therapists, were coded in terms of the type of immediacy used and its immediate effects, as reflected in the client's response. A total of 121 immediacy events were identified in 57 sessions, occupying 8% of the total therapy time; the majority were initiated by the therapist. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to explore where there exist clusters of immediacy events that share patterns of immediacy type and effect. Two distinct clusters of immediacy events were identified. The most common group, which we termed 'limited engagement in immediacy', was characterised by a primarily insight-oriented agenda on the therapist's part, smooth collaboration during the immediacy event, and limited engagement on the client's part. The second cluster, termed 'mutual engagement in immediacy,' reflected more complex processes characterised by conflict, with the therapist using a range of interventions (from alliance-building to insight-oriented interventions), evidence of disruption in the therapist-client collaboration, and the client showing increased engagement and reporting improvement. The findings are discussed drawing upon the literature on the processes of repairing ruptures in the therapeutic alliance and clinical implications regarding the use of immediacy.

探索心理动力治疗中即时事件的类型学:一个潜在类别分析。
即时性是一种治疗干预,需要治疗师和来访者之间就他们此时此地的关系进行明确的讨论。它被认为是一种潜在的强有力的干预,可以促进关系处理,特别是在心理动力学心理治疗中。Τhis本研究旨在透过个案系列分析,探讨即时性在心理动力心理治疗中的应用。从2位治疗师的7个心理治疗中抽取的139个疗程的视频,根据所使用的即时类型及其即时效果进行编码,反映在客户的反应中。在57个疗程中,共发现121个即时事件,占总治疗时间的8%;大多数是由治疗师发起的。我们进行了潜在类别分析,以探索在哪些地方存在具有共同直接类型和效果模式的直接事件集群。确定了两组不同的即时事件。最常见的一组,我们称之为“即时性有限参与”,其特点是治疗师主要以洞察力为导向的议程,即时性事件期间的顺利合作,以及客户的有限参与。第二个集群,被称为“即时的相互参与”,反映了以冲突为特征的更复杂的过程,治疗师使用一系列干预措施(从建立联盟到以洞察力为导向的干预措施),治疗师-客户合作中断的证据,客户表现出更多的参与并报告改善。研究结果讨论借鉴文献修复的过程中破裂的治疗联盟和临床意义,关于使用即时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信