{"title":"Fertility preservation through oocyte or embryo vitrification prior to oncological treatment: a 12-year experience.","authors":"Appoline Zimmermann, Jeanne Perrin, Carole Deveze, Jacqueline Saias-Magnan, Catherine Guillemain, Blandine Courbiere","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03522-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fertility preservation in women with cancer represents a major medical challenge at the intersection of oncological and reproductive concerns. With therapeutic advancements, the survival rates of cancer patients have significantly improved, offering the possibility of motherhood. Currently, there is a lack of data on the return of cryopreserved oocytes/embryos and pregnancy outcomes following cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, single-center, descriptive cohort study, including women who underwent fertility preservation through oocyte or embryo cryopreservation before a medium risk of gonadotoxicity chemotherapy for cancer at our Department of Reproductive Medicine and Oncofertility between January 2012 and May 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 327 women were included, with 318 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and nine embryo cryopreservation. The average follow-up duration was 5.1 ± 2.7 years. Among the 49 women who expressed a desire for pregnancy post-cancer treatment, 65.3% of them (n = 32/49) reported at least one live birth. Of the 35 live births recorded, 80% (n = 28/35) resulted from spontaneous pregnancies, five were achieved after thawing vitrified oocytes (11.4%), and three after oocyte donation (8.6%). The return rate of cryopreserved oocytes was 6.92% (22/318), with a live birth rate per woman of 22.7% (5/22) following oocyte warming.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although fertility preservation (FP) must be proposed systematically in age-reproductive women facing cancer with a medium risk of gonadotoxicity chemotherapy, physicians must be aware of the low rate of oocyte return and the potential for spontaneous pregnancies despite a post-cancer diminished ovarian reserve. Fertility consultations should also be better integrated into oncologic post-treatment care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1453-1459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03522-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Fertility preservation in women with cancer represents a major medical challenge at the intersection of oncological and reproductive concerns. With therapeutic advancements, the survival rates of cancer patients have significantly improved, offering the possibility of motherhood. Currently, there is a lack of data on the return of cryopreserved oocytes/embryos and pregnancy outcomes following cancer treatment.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, descriptive cohort study, including women who underwent fertility preservation through oocyte or embryo cryopreservation before a medium risk of gonadotoxicity chemotherapy for cancer at our Department of Reproductive Medicine and Oncofertility between January 2012 and May 2024.
Results: A total of 327 women were included, with 318 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and nine embryo cryopreservation. The average follow-up duration was 5.1 ± 2.7 years. Among the 49 women who expressed a desire for pregnancy post-cancer treatment, 65.3% of them (n = 32/49) reported at least one live birth. Of the 35 live births recorded, 80% (n = 28/35) resulted from spontaneous pregnancies, five were achieved after thawing vitrified oocytes (11.4%), and three after oocyte donation (8.6%). The return rate of cryopreserved oocytes was 6.92% (22/318), with a live birth rate per woman of 22.7% (5/22) following oocyte warming.
Conclusion: Although fertility preservation (FP) must be proposed systematically in age-reproductive women facing cancer with a medium risk of gonadotoxicity chemotherapy, physicians must be aware of the low rate of oocyte return and the potential for spontaneous pregnancies despite a post-cancer diminished ovarian reserve. Fertility consultations should also be better integrated into oncologic post-treatment care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.