Effect of precooling the anesthetic agent in comparison to increasing the dosage on the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block using articaine in mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bafrin Fattahi, Negin Ghasemi, Sahar Shakouei, Mahsa Ladan Moghaddam
{"title":"Effect of precooling the anesthetic agent in comparison to increasing the dosage on the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block using articaine in mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Bafrin Fattahi, Negin Ghasemi, Sahar Shakouei, Mahsa Ladan Moghaddam","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving anesthesia in mandibular molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis has been challenging. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of precooling articaine and increasing its dosage for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in the mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 90 first mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (VAS > 54) were randomly divided into three groups and received conventional IANB injection with 1.8 mL (one cartridge )1C Group() or 3.6 mL (two cartridges )2C Group() of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine with room temperature or 1.8 ml of the same agent with 4°C temperature (cold cartridge )CC Group(). The patients recorded their pain during the injection and access cavity preparation, pulp chamber and root canal entrance using a visual analog scale. Data were analyzed by repeated measure of ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all three groups, the pain levels at different injection times were significantly different (P < 0.05). The pain level did not differ significantly between the 2C Group and the CC Group (P > 0.05), but the difference was significant between the 1C Group and 2C Groups (P < 0.05) and also between the 1C Group and CC Group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administration of cold articaine provides a significantly higher success rate of IANBs in mandibular first molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis compared to IANB with articaine kept at room temperature, however, increasing the dosage of articaine led to a significantly higher success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving anesthesia in mandibular molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis has been challenging. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of precooling articaine and increasing its dosage for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in the mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Methods: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 90 first mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (VAS > 54) were randomly divided into three groups and received conventional IANB injection with 1.8 mL (one cartridge )1C Group() or 3.6 mL (two cartridges )2C Group() of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine with room temperature or 1.8 ml of the same agent with 4°C temperature (cold cartridge )CC Group(). The patients recorded their pain during the injection and access cavity preparation, pulp chamber and root canal entrance using a visual analog scale. Data were analyzed by repeated measure of ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (P < 0.05).

Results: In all three groups, the pain levels at different injection times were significantly different (P < 0.05). The pain level did not differ significantly between the 2C Group and the CC Group (P > 0.05), but the difference was significant between the 1C Group and 2C Groups (P < 0.05) and also between the 1C Group and CC Group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Administration of cold articaine provides a significantly higher success rate of IANBs in mandibular first molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis compared to IANB with articaine kept at room temperature, however, increasing the dosage of articaine led to a significantly higher success rate.

双盲、随机对照临床试验:麻醉药物预冷却与增加剂量对下颌第一磨牙下牙槽神经阻滞治疗症状不可逆性牙髓炎成功率的影响
在不可逆性牙髓炎的下颌磨牙中实现麻醉一直是一个挑战。本研究旨在比较预冷阿替卡因和增加阿替卡因剂量对下颌第一磨牙下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)治疗症状性不可逆牙髓炎的疗效。方法:在随机双盲临床试验中,90颗有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎(VAS bbbb54)的第一下颌磨牙随机分为3组,分别接受常规IANB注射1.8 mL(1盒)1C组()或3.6 mL(2盒)2C组()4%阿替卡因加1:20万肾上腺素室温或1.8 mL相同药物4℃温度(冷盒)CC组()。使用视觉模拟量表记录患者在注射、入牙槽准备、牙髓室和根管入口过程中的疼痛。资料分析采用重复测量方差分析和Bonferroni检验(P < 0.05)。结果:三组患者不同注射时间疼痛程度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2C组与CC组疼痛程度差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),但1C组与2C组、1C组与CC组疼痛程度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:冷敷阿替卡因治疗症状性不可逆性牙髓炎的下颌第一磨牙IANB的成功率明显高于常温保存阿替卡因的IANB,但增加阿替卡因的剂量可显著提高IANB的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信