Esther Lems, Jordy E Mongula, Caroline L P Muntinga, Jaklien C Leemans, Janneke S Hoogstad-van Evert, Rixt A Smit, Jan W van der Steeg, Brenda M Pijlman, Sjors F P J Coppus, Marlies Y Bongers, Christianne A R Lok, Jurgen M J Piek, Peggy M A J Geomini
{"title":"Real-world performance of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model for the pre-operative classification of ovarian tumors.","authors":"Esther Lems, Jordy E Mongula, Caroline L P Muntinga, Jaklien C Leemans, Janneke S Hoogstad-van Evert, Rixt A Smit, Jan W van der Steeg, Brenda M Pijlman, Sjors F P J Coppus, Marlies Y Bongers, Christianne A R Lok, Jurgen M J Piek, Peggy M A J Geomini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To predict the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors, the multi-class risk prediction Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group is used internationally. This study aimed to perform an external validation of this model in a real-world clinical setting in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed. Women aged ≥18 years who attended the outpatient clinic between May 2020 and December 2021 and had a first ultrasound assessment for an ovarian tumor with application of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model were included. The reference standard was the pathology result in case of surgery or follow-up with ultrasound according to the current Dutch guideline in case of conservative management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 363 women included, 286 (78.8%) had benign, 24 (6.6%) had borderline, and 53 (14.6%) had malignant pathology. Most (62.5%) of the included patients underwent surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered malignant and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered benign. Cutoff values between 7% and 14% yielded the highest Youden index. The model was moderately able to differentiate between malignant histologic sub-types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ADNEX model showed excellent diagnostic performance in daily clinical practice and retained its value in a population in which a proportion of patients were treated with conservative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 7","pages":"101917"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To predict the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors, the multi-class risk prediction Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group is used internationally. This study aimed to perform an external validation of this model in a real-world clinical setting in the Netherlands.
Methods: A multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed. Women aged ≥18 years who attended the outpatient clinic between May 2020 and December 2021 and had a first ultrasound assessment for an ovarian tumor with application of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model were included. The reference standard was the pathology result in case of surgery or follow-up with ultrasound according to the current Dutch guideline in case of conservative management.
Results: Of the 363 women included, 286 (78.8%) had benign, 24 (6.6%) had borderline, and 53 (14.6%) had malignant pathology. Most (62.5%) of the included patients underwent surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered malignant and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered benign. Cutoff values between 7% and 14% yielded the highest Youden index. The model was moderately able to differentiate between malignant histologic sub-types.
Conclusions: The ADNEX model showed excellent diagnostic performance in daily clinical practice and retained its value in a population in which a proportion of patients were treated with conservative management.
目的:为了预测卵巢肿瘤的恶性风险,国际上采用了国际卵巢肿瘤分析组织(International ovarian Tumor Analysis group)的ADNEX (multi-class risk prediction Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa)模型。本研究旨在在荷兰的真实世界临床环境中对该模型进行外部验证。方法:进行多中心回顾性诊断准确性研究。纳入了2020年5月至2021年12月期间就诊门诊并应用国际卵巢肿瘤分析ADNEX模型进行首次卵巢肿瘤超声评估的年龄≥18岁的女性。参照标准为手术或超声随访时的病理结果,参照荷兰现行保守治疗指南。结果:363例女性中,良性286例(78.8%),交界性24例(6.6%),恶性53例(14.6%)。大多数(62.5%)纳入的患者接受了手术。若交界性肿瘤为恶性,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.92 (95% CI 0.89 ~ 0.96);若交界性肿瘤为良性,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.93 (95% CI 0.89 ~ 0.96)。约登指数的下限在7%到14%之间。该模型能够适度区分恶性组织学亚型。结论:ADNEX模型在日常临床实践中表现出良好的诊断性能,在一定比例的患者接受保守治疗的人群中保持其价值。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.