Real-world performance of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model for the pre-operative classification of ovarian tumors.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Esther Lems, Jordy E Mongula, Caroline L P Muntinga, Jaklien C Leemans, Janneke S Hoogstad-van Evert, Rixt A Smit, Jan W van der Steeg, Brenda M Pijlman, Sjors F P J Coppus, Marlies Y Bongers, Christianne A R Lok, Jurgen M J Piek, Peggy M A J Geomini
{"title":"Real-world performance of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model for the pre-operative classification of ovarian tumors.","authors":"Esther Lems, Jordy E Mongula, Caroline L P Muntinga, Jaklien C Leemans, Janneke S Hoogstad-van Evert, Rixt A Smit, Jan W van der Steeg, Brenda M Pijlman, Sjors F P J Coppus, Marlies Y Bongers, Christianne A R Lok, Jurgen M J Piek, Peggy M A J Geomini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To predict the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors, the multi-class risk prediction Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group is used internationally. This study aimed to perform an external validation of this model in a real-world clinical setting in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed. Women aged ≥18 years who attended the outpatient clinic between May 2020 and December 2021 and had a first ultrasound assessment for an ovarian tumor with application of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model were included. The reference standard was the pathology result in case of surgery or follow-up with ultrasound according to the current Dutch guideline in case of conservative management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 363 women included, 286 (78.8%) had benign, 24 (6.6%) had borderline, and 53 (14.6%) had malignant pathology. Most (62.5%) of the included patients underwent surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered malignant and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered benign. Cutoff values between 7% and 14% yielded the highest Youden index. The model was moderately able to differentiate between malignant histologic sub-types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ADNEX model showed excellent diagnostic performance in daily clinical practice and retained its value in a population in which a proportion of patients were treated with conservative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 7","pages":"101917"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To predict the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors, the multi-class risk prediction Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group is used internationally. This study aimed to perform an external validation of this model in a real-world clinical setting in the Netherlands.

Methods: A multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed. Women aged ≥18 years who attended the outpatient clinic between May 2020 and December 2021 and had a first ultrasound assessment for an ovarian tumor with application of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model were included. The reference standard was the pathology result in case of surgery or follow-up with ultrasound according to the current Dutch guideline in case of conservative management.

Results: Of the 363 women included, 286 (78.8%) had benign, 24 (6.6%) had borderline, and 53 (14.6%) had malignant pathology. Most (62.5%) of the included patients underwent surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered malignant and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) if borderline tumors were considered benign. Cutoff values between 7% and 14% yielded the highest Youden index. The model was moderately able to differentiate between malignant histologic sub-types.

Conclusions: The ADNEX model showed excellent diagnostic performance in daily clinical practice and retained its value in a population in which a proportion of patients were treated with conservative management.

adneXa (ADNEX)模型在卵巢肿瘤术前分类中评估不同肿瘤的实际表现。
目的:为了预测卵巢肿瘤的恶性风险,国际上采用了国际卵巢肿瘤分析组织(International ovarian Tumor Analysis group)的ADNEX (multi-class risk prediction Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa)模型。本研究旨在在荷兰的真实世界临床环境中对该模型进行外部验证。方法:进行多中心回顾性诊断准确性研究。纳入了2020年5月至2021年12月期间就诊门诊并应用国际卵巢肿瘤分析ADNEX模型进行首次卵巢肿瘤超声评估的年龄≥18岁的女性。参照标准为手术或超声随访时的病理结果,参照荷兰现行保守治疗指南。结果:363例女性中,良性286例(78.8%),交界性24例(6.6%),恶性53例(14.6%)。大多数(62.5%)纳入的患者接受了手术。若交界性肿瘤为恶性,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.92 (95% CI 0.89 ~ 0.96);若交界性肿瘤为良性,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.93 (95% CI 0.89 ~ 0.96)。约登指数的下限在7%到14%之间。该模型能够适度区分恶性组织学亚型。结论:ADNEX模型在日常临床实践中表现出良好的诊断性能,在一定比例的患者接受保守治疗的人群中保持其价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信