Predicting medicine related harm in older adults post discharge: an Australian feasibility study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Phu Sabei Shwe, Amy Page, H Laetitia Hattingh, Nikesh Parekh, Khalid Ali, Chakravarthi Rajkumar
{"title":"Predicting medicine related harm in older adults post discharge: an Australian feasibility study.","authors":"Phu Sabei Shwe, Amy Page, H Laetitia Hattingh, Nikesh Parekh, Khalid Ali, Chakravarthi Rajkumar","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the feasibility of identifying older patients at risk of medicine-related harm (MRH) at hospital discharge using a MRH risk-prediction tool, follow them up in the community, and identify the incidence and severity of MRH causing readmission to hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were over 65 years admitted to a general medical ward were recruited 48 hours prior to discharge from two hospitals in Queensland, Australia, 19 October 2020 to 15 March 2021. Ward pharmacists predicted the likelihood of MRH post-discharge and confidence in this decision. Participants were followed up until eight weeks post-discharge; data were extracted from hospital records. An expert panel of five senior clinicians assessed structured case summaries of participants who attended hospital within the follow-up 56-day period to determine MRH. MRH risk was assessed using the PRIME (Prospective study to develop a model to stratify the RIsk of Medication-related harm in hospitalized Elderly patients) tool.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>All 39 patients approached consented; 31 participated in follow-up phone calls. Of these 39, 23 (59%) had one or more readmission within 56 days. Six readmissions in five participants were associated with MRH. Of the MRH, three were definite adverse drug reactions while one was due to medicine non-adherence. MRH was potentially preventable in four cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes show it is feasible to recruit and complete follow-up of older patients in the Australian healthcare system to examine the burden of MRH and use of a risk identification tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the feasibility of identifying older patients at risk of medicine-related harm (MRH) at hospital discharge using a MRH risk-prediction tool, follow them up in the community, and identify the incidence and severity of MRH causing readmission to hospital.

Methods: Patients who were over 65 years admitted to a general medical ward were recruited 48 hours prior to discharge from two hospitals in Queensland, Australia, 19 October 2020 to 15 March 2021. Ward pharmacists predicted the likelihood of MRH post-discharge and confidence in this decision. Participants were followed up until eight weeks post-discharge; data were extracted from hospital records. An expert panel of five senior clinicians assessed structured case summaries of participants who attended hospital within the follow-up 56-day period to determine MRH. MRH risk was assessed using the PRIME (Prospective study to develop a model to stratify the RIsk of Medication-related harm in hospitalized Elderly patients) tool.

Key findings: All 39 patients approached consented; 31 participated in follow-up phone calls. Of these 39, 23 (59%) had one or more readmission within 56 days. Six readmissions in five participants were associated with MRH. Of the MRH, three were definite adverse drug reactions while one was due to medicine non-adherence. MRH was potentially preventable in four cases.

Conclusion: Outcomes show it is feasible to recruit and complete follow-up of older patients in the Australian healthcare system to examine the burden of MRH and use of a risk identification tool.

预测老年人出院后的药物相关伤害:澳大利亚的可行性研究。
目的:探讨利用MRH风险预测工具识别出院时存在药物相关伤害风险(MRH)的老年患者的可行性,并对其进行社区随访,确定MRH再入院的发生率和严重程度。方法:于2020年10月19日至2021年3月15日在澳大利亚昆士兰州的两家医院招募出院前48小时入住普通病房的65岁以上患者。病房药剂师预测出院后MRH的可能性和对这一决定的信心。参与者随访至出院后8周;数据从医院记录中提取。由五名资深临床医生组成的专家小组评估了在随访56天期间住院的参与者的结构化病例摘要,以确定MRH。MRH风险评估采用PRIME(前瞻性研究开发模型分层住院老年患者药物相关伤害风险)工具。主要发现:所有39例患者均同意;31人参与随访电话。在这39人中,23人(59%)在56天内再入院一次或多次。5名参与者中6人再入院与MRH相关。在MRH中,3例是明确的药物不良反应,1例是由于药物不依从性。有4例MRH是可以预防的。结论:结果表明,在澳大利亚医疗保健系统中招募和完成老年患者随访以检查MRH负担和使用风险识别工具是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信