Geriatric 8 score as a prognostic factor of the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Koki Hara, Wakana Chikaishi, Yunami Yamada, Hironori Fujii, Jesse Yu Tajima, Hirotoshi Iihara, Akitaka Makiyama, Daichi Watanabe, Koichi Ohata, Chiemi Hirose, Ryo Kobayashi, Akio Suzuki, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
{"title":"Geriatric 8 score as a prognostic factor of the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.","authors":"Koki Hara, Wakana Chikaishi, Yunami Yamada, Hironori Fujii, Jesse Yu Tajima, Hirotoshi Iihara, Akitaka Makiyama, Daichi Watanabe, Koichi Ohata, Chiemi Hirose, Ryo Kobayashi, Akio Suzuki, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04923-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is effective in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, given concerns about the possible impact of L-OHP-based chemotherapy regimens in the face of physical functional decline, the question of whether they should be actively recommended for elderly patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the relationship between the Geriatric 8 (G8) score, which assesses overall function in the elderly, and the efficacy and safety of L-OHP-based chemotherapy regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included mCRC patients aged ≥ 70 years who received L-OHP as first-line therapy between January 2017 and December 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was incidence of adverse events (Grade ≥ 2). Patients were classified into high (≥ 14 points) and low (< 14 points) G8 score groups for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 patients were included. Median PFS was significantly longer in the high G8 score group compared to the low G8 score group (12.4 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.034). No significant difference in OS was observed (27.9 vs. 29.8 months, P = 0.833). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, but nausea incidence tended to be higher in the low G8 score group (0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.096).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The G8 score may serve as a useful prognostic factor in elderly mCRC patients receiving L-OHP. Those with lower G8 scores may be at higher risk of L-OHP-induced nausea.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04923-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is effective in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, given concerns about the possible impact of L-OHP-based chemotherapy regimens in the face of physical functional decline, the question of whether they should be actively recommended for elderly patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the relationship between the Geriatric 8 (G8) score, which assesses overall function in the elderly, and the efficacy and safety of L-OHP-based chemotherapy regimens.

Methods: This retrospective study included mCRC patients aged ≥ 70 years who received L-OHP as first-line therapy between January 2017 and December 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was incidence of adverse events (Grade ≥ 2). Patients were classified into high (≥ 14 points) and low (< 14 points) G8 score groups for comparison.

Results: A total of 55 patients were included. Median PFS was significantly longer in the high G8 score group compared to the low G8 score group (12.4 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.034). No significant difference in OS was observed (27.9 vs. 29.8 months, P = 0.833). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, but nausea incidence tended to be higher in the low G8 score group (0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.096).

Conclusion: The G8 score may serve as a useful prognostic factor in elderly mCRC patients receiving L-OHP. Those with lower G8 scores may be at higher risk of L-OHP-induced nausea.

老年8分作为奥沙利铂为基础的老年转移性结直肠癌化疗疗效和安全性的预后因素
目的:奥沙利铂(L-OHP)是治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的有效药物。然而,考虑到以l - ohp为基础的化疗方案在面对身体功能下降时可能产生的影响,是否应该积极推荐给老年患者的问题仍不清楚。本研究评估了老年人总体功能的Geriatric 8 (G8)评分与以l - ohp为基础的化疗方案的有效性和安全性之间的关系。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2017年1月至2022年12月期间接受L-OHP作为一线治疗的年龄≥70岁的mCRC患者。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点是不良事件的发生率(Grade≥2)。将患者分为高(≥14分)和低(结果:共纳入55例患者。G8评分高组的中位PFS明显长于G8评分低组(12.4个月对6.0个月,P = 0.034)。两组总生存期无显著差异(27.9个月vs 29.8个月,P = 0.833)。总体不良事件发生率相当,但G8评分低组恶心发生率更高(0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.096)。结论:G8评分可作为接受L-OHP的老年mCRC患者的一个有用的预后指标。G8得分较低的人可能有较高的l -羟色胺诱导恶心的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信