The etiology differs regards to the locations of the lesion: a clinical experience of 1350 patients with adenomyosis confirmed by postoperative pathology.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Wanqing Li, Yuting Hang, Yunyu Xu, Wen Zhang, Ye He, Wei Ye, Xinyue Hu, Zhaolian Wei
{"title":"The etiology differs regards to the locations of the lesion: a clinical experience of 1350 patients with adenomyosis confirmed by postoperative pathology.","authors":"Wanqing Li, Yuting Hang, Yunyu Xu, Wen Zhang, Ye He, Wei Ye, Xinyue Hu, Zhaolian Wei","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03759-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite proposed mechanisms hypotheses, the etiology of adenomyosis remains unclear. The limited efficacy of current therapeutic approaches may stem from insufficient understanding of its pathobiological underpinnings and the pronounced heterogeneity in clinical presentation and treatment responsiveness among subtypes. This study seeks to compare clinical and sonographic profiles of adenomyosis subtypes to elucidate distinct disease mechanisms and inform subtype-specific management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort of 1,350 surgically treated and pathologically confirmed adenomyosis cases (2017-2022), patients were categorized into diffuse versus focal and anterior versus posterior lesion groups according to sonographic features. Comparative analyses of demographics, symptomatology, concurrent gynecological conditions, and laboratory profiles were conducted to delineate subtype-specific patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1074 (79.56%) had a definitive adenomyotic sonographic signs, with 329 (30.63%) focal adenomyosis and 745 (69.37%) diffuse adenomyosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with focal adenomyosis, diffuse adenomyosis were older (OR, 1.09; 95%CI: 1.06-1.12), had more pregnancies (OR, 1.22; 95%CI: 1.11-1.33), higher BMI (OR, 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00-1.09), long course of disease (OR, 1.06; 95%CI: 1.02-1.11) and higher risk of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (OR, 1.88; 95%CI: 1.36-2.60). Divided to the location of adenomyosis lesion indicated by sonographic, patients in the posterior wall group (n = 418) have higher risk of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (OR, 1.88; 95% CI: 1.36-2.60), more endometriosis combination (OR, 3.24; 95%CI: 1.85-5.68) and intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.001; 95%CI: 1.001-1.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By stratifying adenomyosis into diffuse/focal and anterior/posterior subtypes, we identified distinct clinical-pathological profiles: (1) Diffuse adenomyosis was independently associated with older age, higher gravidity, and severe dysmenorrhea, suggesting a progressive phenotype driven by tissue injury mechanisms; (2) Posterior lesions exhibited a 3.24-fold risk of concurrent endometriosis and increased surgical complexity, implicating shared pathways with deep infiltrating endometriosis. These findings redefine adenomyosis as a heterogeneous disorder with subtype-specific pathophysiology, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03759-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite proposed mechanisms hypotheses, the etiology of adenomyosis remains unclear. The limited efficacy of current therapeutic approaches may stem from insufficient understanding of its pathobiological underpinnings and the pronounced heterogeneity in clinical presentation and treatment responsiveness among subtypes. This study seeks to compare clinical and sonographic profiles of adenomyosis subtypes to elucidate distinct disease mechanisms and inform subtype-specific management strategies.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort of 1,350 surgically treated and pathologically confirmed adenomyosis cases (2017-2022), patients were categorized into diffuse versus focal and anterior versus posterior lesion groups according to sonographic features. Comparative analyses of demographics, symptomatology, concurrent gynecological conditions, and laboratory profiles were conducted to delineate subtype-specific patterns.

Results: 1074 (79.56%) had a definitive adenomyotic sonographic signs, with 329 (30.63%) focal adenomyosis and 745 (69.37%) diffuse adenomyosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with focal adenomyosis, diffuse adenomyosis were older (OR, 1.09; 95%CI: 1.06-1.12), had more pregnancies (OR, 1.22; 95%CI: 1.11-1.33), higher BMI (OR, 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00-1.09), long course of disease (OR, 1.06; 95%CI: 1.02-1.11) and higher risk of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (OR, 1.88; 95%CI: 1.36-2.60). Divided to the location of adenomyosis lesion indicated by sonographic, patients in the posterior wall group (n = 418) have higher risk of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (OR, 1.88; 95% CI: 1.36-2.60), more endometriosis combination (OR, 3.24; 95%CI: 1.85-5.68) and intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.001; 95%CI: 1.001-1.003).

Conclusion: By stratifying adenomyosis into diffuse/focal and anterior/posterior subtypes, we identified distinct clinical-pathological profiles: (1) Diffuse adenomyosis was independently associated with older age, higher gravidity, and severe dysmenorrhea, suggesting a progressive phenotype driven by tissue injury mechanisms; (2) Posterior lesions exhibited a 3.24-fold risk of concurrent endometriosis and increased surgical complexity, implicating shared pathways with deep infiltrating endometriosis. These findings redefine adenomyosis as a heterogeneous disorder with subtype-specific pathophysiology, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies.

病因因病变部位不同而不同:1350例子宫腺肌症患者的临床经验经术后病理证实。
背景:尽管提出了机制假说,但子宫腺肌症的病因尚不清楚。目前治疗方法的有限疗效可能源于对其病理生物学基础的了解不足,以及亚型之间临床表现和治疗反应性的明显异质性。本研究旨在比较子宫腺肌症亚型的临床和超声特征,以阐明不同的疾病机制,并为亚型特异性管理策略提供信息。方法:对1350例手术治疗和病理证实的子宫腺肌症病例(2017-2022年)进行回顾性队列研究,根据超声特征将患者分为弥漫性与局灶性、前部与后部病变组。对人口统计学、症状学、并发妇科疾病和实验室资料进行比较分析,以描述亚型特异性模式。结果:1074例(79.56%)有明确的腺肌病超声征象,其中局灶性子宫腺肌症329例(30.63%),弥漫性子宫腺肌症745例(69.37%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,与局灶性子宫腺肌症相比,弥漫性子宫腺肌症年龄较大(OR, 1.09;95%CI: 1.06-1.12),有更多的怀孕(OR, 1.22;95%CI: 1.11-1.33),较高的BMI (OR, 1.05;95%CI: 1.00-1.09),病程长(OR, 1.06;95%CI: 1.02-1.11)和中重度痛经的较高风险(OR, 1.88;95%置信区间:1.36—-2.60)。根据超声显示的子宫腺肌症病变部位,后壁组(n = 418)患者发生中重度痛经的风险较高(OR, 1.88;95% CI: 1.36-2.60),更多的子宫内膜异位症合并(OR, 3.24;95%CI: 1.85-5.68)和术中出血量(OR, 1.001;95%置信区间:1.001—-1.003)。结论:通过将子宫腺肌症分为弥漫性/局灶性和前型/后型,我们发现了不同的临床病理特征:(1)弥漫性子宫腺肌症与年龄较大、体重较高和严重痛经独立相关,表明其表型由组织损伤机制驱动;(2)后部病变并发子宫内膜异位症的风险为3.24倍,手术复杂性增加,暗示与深浸润性子宫内膜异位症有共同的途径。这些发现将子宫腺肌症重新定义为具有亚型特异性病理生理的异质性疾病,提倡量身定制的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信