Validation of the Russian version of the realistic moral vignettes for studies of moral judgments.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Zorina Rakhmankulova, Rustam Asgarov, Eliana Monahhova, Semyon Mening, Isak B Blank, Vasily Klucharev
{"title":"Validation of the Russian version of the realistic moral vignettes for studies of moral judgments.","authors":"Zorina Rakhmankulova, Rustam Asgarov, Eliana Monahhova, Semyon Mening, Isak B Blank, Vasily Klucharev","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02709-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral judgments and behavior are shaped by individual experiences and cultural environments. In two online studies, we used a standard set of moral vignettes to examine the generalizability of factor structure of moral judgments originally identified in American samples (Knutson et al. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 378-384, 2010; Kruepke et al. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 922-936, 2018) by testing two independent samples of the Russian population (Study 1, N = 247; Study 2, N = 223). In Study 1, the exploratory factor analysis revealed three components that accounted for most of the variance: norm violation, social affect, and intention. In Study 2, the factor structure of the identified moral components was validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Latent profile analysis revealed five distinct profiles of moral scenarios: Peccadillo, Illegal-Antisocial, Controversial Act, Prosocial, and a novel profile specific to our Russian samples - Social Conflict - as compared to the previous study of the American population. These findings suggest fundamental similarities in moral judgment processes across cultures while also highlighting culture-specific patterns in moral scenario categorization. This study also provides researchers with a battery of real-life experience-derived vignettes that can be used in cross-cultural studies of moral judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 7","pages":"184"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02709-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moral judgments and behavior are shaped by individual experiences and cultural environments. In two online studies, we used a standard set of moral vignettes to examine the generalizability of factor structure of moral judgments originally identified in American samples (Knutson et al. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 378-384, 2010; Kruepke et al. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 922-936, 2018) by testing two independent samples of the Russian population (Study 1, N = 247; Study 2, N = 223). In Study 1, the exploratory factor analysis revealed three components that accounted for most of the variance: norm violation, social affect, and intention. In Study 2, the factor structure of the identified moral components was validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Latent profile analysis revealed five distinct profiles of moral scenarios: Peccadillo, Illegal-Antisocial, Controversial Act, Prosocial, and a novel profile specific to our Russian samples - Social Conflict - as compared to the previous study of the American population. These findings suggest fundamental similarities in moral judgment processes across cultures while also highlighting culture-specific patterns in moral scenario categorization. This study also provides researchers with a battery of real-life experience-derived vignettes that can be used in cross-cultural studies of moral judgment.

俄罗斯版现实主义道德小插曲对道德判断研究的验证。
道德判断和行为受到个人经历和文化环境的影响。在两项在线研究中,我们使用了一套标准的道德小插曲来检验最初在美国样本中发现的道德判断因素结构的普遍性(Knutson等人)。社会认知与情感科学,5,378-384,2010;Kruepke等人。行为研究方法,50,922-936,2018)通过测试两个独立的俄罗斯人口样本(研究1,N = 247;研究2,N = 223)。在研究1中,探索性因子分析揭示了三个组成部分占方差的大部分:规范违反,社会影响和意图。研究2采用验证性因子分析对道德成分的因子结构进行验证。与先前对美国人口的研究相比,潜在剖面分析揭示了道德情景的五种不同剖面:Peccadillo,非法-反社会,有争议的行为,亲社会,以及我们的俄罗斯样本特有的新颖剖面-社会冲突。这些发现表明,不同文化的道德判断过程具有基本的相似性,同时也强调了道德情景分类中的文化特有模式。这项研究还为研究人员提供了一系列来自现实生活经验的小插曲,这些小插曲可以用于道德判断的跨文化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信