Accuracy of COVID-19 vaccination Self-report compared with data from VSD electronic health Records for Pregnant Women and non-pregnant Adults, 2021-2022.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amy B Stein, Joshua T B Williams, Laura P Hurley, Kristin Breslin, Kate Kurlandsky, Simon J Hambidge, Jennifer C Nelson, Candace C Fuller, Bradley Crane, Kayla E Hanson, Sungching C Glenn, Amelia Jazwa, Liza M Reifler
{"title":"Accuracy of COVID-19 vaccination Self-report compared with data from VSD electronic health Records for Pregnant Women and non-pregnant Adults, 2021-2022.","authors":"Amy B Stein, Joshua T B Williams, Laura P Hurley, Kristin Breslin, Kate Kurlandsky, Simon J Hambidge, Jennifer C Nelson, Candace C Fuller, Bradley Crane, Kayla E Hanson, Sungching C Glenn, Amelia Jazwa, Liza M Reifler","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, accurate measurement of vaccination status was important for guiding prevention efforts. We assessed the accuracy of electronic health record (EHR) COVID-19 vaccination compared with survey self-reported vaccination status using data from a cross-sectional study among pregnant women and non-pregnant adults in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) between 2021 and 2022, where self-report was considered the reference standard. We measured sensitivity and specificity of EHR vaccine data compared with the self-reported measure and estimated vaccination rates from EHR data. EHR data were obtained initially in November 2021, updated in April 2022, and record review in July 2022. Vaccination coverage increased in pregnant/formerly pregnant women and non-pregnant adult respondents by 23.9% and 9.2%, respectively, over 9 months. Estimates of sensitivity based on initial EHR data were 66.0% and 77.3% for pregnant women and non-pregnant people overall and between 41% and 66% for pregnant, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic, Spanish-speaking respondents. With matured, chart reviewed EHR data from April 2022, the sensitivity and specificity of EHR vaccine status relative to self-report were >93%. EHR data was a reasonable source of COVID-19 vaccination status during the pandemic and showed high accuracy with self-reported data after allowing EHR data to mature.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, accurate measurement of vaccination status was important for guiding prevention efforts. We assessed the accuracy of electronic health record (EHR) COVID-19 vaccination compared with survey self-reported vaccination status using data from a cross-sectional study among pregnant women and non-pregnant adults in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) between 2021 and 2022, where self-report was considered the reference standard. We measured sensitivity and specificity of EHR vaccine data compared with the self-reported measure and estimated vaccination rates from EHR data. EHR data were obtained initially in November 2021, updated in April 2022, and record review in July 2022. Vaccination coverage increased in pregnant/formerly pregnant women and non-pregnant adult respondents by 23.9% and 9.2%, respectively, over 9 months. Estimates of sensitivity based on initial EHR data were 66.0% and 77.3% for pregnant women and non-pregnant people overall and between 41% and 66% for pregnant, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic, Spanish-speaking respondents. With matured, chart reviewed EHR data from April 2022, the sensitivity and specificity of EHR vaccine status relative to self-report were >93%. EHR data was a reasonable source of COVID-19 vaccination status during the pandemic and showed high accuracy with self-reported data after allowing EHR data to mature.

2021-2022年孕妇和非孕妇成人VSD电子健康记录数据与COVID-19疫苗接种自我报告的准确性比较
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,准确测量疫苗接种状况对于指导预防工作非常重要。我们评估了电子健康记录(EHR) COVID-19疫苗接种与调查自我报告的疫苗接种状况的准确性,使用的数据来自2021年至2022年疫苗安全数据链(VSD)中孕妇和非怀孕成年人的横断面研究数据,其中自我报告被认为是参考标准。我们将EHR疫苗数据的敏感性和特异性与来自EHR数据的自我报告测量和估计疫苗接种率进行比较。电子病历数据最初于2021年11月获得,2022年4月更新,并于2022年7月进行记录审查。在9个月内,怀孕/曾怀孕妇女和非怀孕成人应答者的疫苗接种覆盖率分别增加了23.9%和9.2%。基于初始EHR数据的敏感性估计在孕妇和非孕妇中总体为66.0%和77.3%,在孕妇、非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔、讲西班牙语的受访者中为41%和66%。利用2022年4月以来的成熟的电子病历数据,电子病历疫苗状况相对于自我报告的敏感性和特异性均为0.93%。电子病历数据是大流行期间COVID-19疫苗接种状况的合理来源,并且在允许电子病历数据成熟后,与自我报告数据显示出较高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信